Pilot Evaluation of Hospice Decision Support Tools

NCT ID: NCT03794700

Last Updated: 2022-08-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

131 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-15

Study Completion Date

2020-03-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this project is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a hospice decision aid among a diverse population of older adults at multiple stages of illness (Aim 1) and to determine the preliminary efficacy of the hospice decision aid on decision quality, hospice knowledge, and values-concordance (Aim 2). By testing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel hospice Patient Decision Aid (PTDa) in a diverse population of older adults, additionally the study will simultaneously explore barriers to PtDA implementation in both an outpatient primary care and inpatient palliative care setting. The study will also gather sufficient pilot data to support a subsequent effectiveness/implementation trial and thus address the absence of quality of SDM interventions for end-of-life care decision-making.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hospice End-of-life Decision Making Hospice Decision Making

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention

Participants will receive hospice decisional support materials and be asked to review them. Participants will provide feedback on tools and complete feasibility, efficacy and knowledge assessments.

Group Type OTHER

Hospice Decision Aids

Intervention Type OTHER

Paper and video hospice decision aid

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hospice Decision Aids

Paper and video hospice decision aid

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 65 or older.
* At least one life-limiting illness or syndrome.

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-English speakers.
* Patients with cognitive Impairments preventing ability to provide informed consent.
* Patients on isolation precautions due to resistant bacteria or impaired immune function.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel Matlock, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado Denver

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brereton E, Harger G, Matlock DD, Dorsey Holliman B, Tate CE. How Do Patients Describe Hospice Care? A Qualitative Analysis of the Language Used by Older Adults to Describe Hospice Care. J Palliat Med. 2022 Nov;25(11):1692-1696. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0011. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35944273 (View on PubMed)

Tate CE, Venechuk G, Pierce K, Khazanie P, Ingle MP, Morris MA, Allen LA, Matlock DD. Development of a Decision Aid for Patients and Families Considering Hospice. J Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;24(4):505-513. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0250. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33439075 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21AG059114-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

18-1138

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Advanced Dementia and End-of-life
NCT03548142 COMPLETED NA
Decision Aid for Dementia Therapies
NCT06638632 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA