Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint vs Microscissors or Graspers
NCT ID: NCT02590666
Last Updated: 2016-03-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-30
2017-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of bipolar resection energy polypectomy versus microscissors or graspers These procedures assume a lower cost and are associated with a lower surgical risk due to their realization without anesthesia .
Hypothesis: Resection of polyps outpatient laser diode has a similar or superior to that of the bipolar electrode tolerability. The diode laser is a viable , quick , simple technique with a high percentage of resection and high degree of satisfaction of patients
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Study of Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint and Laser Diode. A Randomised Controlled Trial.
NCT02126397
5Fr Bipolar Electrode vs. Conical Optical 5Fr Fibers for Dual Wave-length Diode Laser for Hysteroscopic Polypectomy
NCT06526962
A Trial Comparing Morcellation With Electrical Resection for Removal of Uterine Polyps
NCT01509313
Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System Versus Bipolar Resectoscopy for Polypectomy: Long-term Results
NCT05337046
Resectoscopic Treatment of Atypical Endometrial Polyps in Fertile Women
NCT00490087
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bipolar electrode
Polyps resection with bipolar electrode
Bipolar Polypectomy
Polyps resection with bipolar electrode
Bipolar electrode
Bipolar electrode used to performs polypectomy
Microscissors or graspers
Polyps resection with microscissors or graspers
Mechanical Polypectomy
Polyps resection with microscissors or graspers
Microscissors or graspers
Mechanical instruments used to performs polypectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bipolar Polypectomy
Polyps resection with bipolar electrode
Mechanical Polypectomy
Polyps resection with microscissors or graspers
Bipolar electrode
Bipolar electrode used to performs polypectomy
Microscissors or graspers
Mechanical instruments used to performs polypectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Uterine malignancy
* Abnormal uterine bleeding
18 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cagliari
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stefano Angioni
Associate Professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PolypectomyCA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.