Comparison of Operative Hysteroscopy Performed in the Operating Room Versus Outpatient Settings
NCT ID: NCT07146659
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-01
2027-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility, Effectiveness and Safety of Outpatient Hysteroscopy
NCT04462835
Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System Versus Bipolar Resectoscopy for Polypectomy: Long-term Results
NCT05337046
Hand Driven Versus Motor Driven Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System for Polypectomy: Long-term Results
NCT05337605
Morcellator Versus Resectoscope in the Treatment of Uterine Polyps by Hysteroscopy
NCT02472197
The Use of a Morcellator in Operative Hysteroscopy for Benign Intracavitary Lesions: a Feasibility Study
NCT05811286
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In recent years, advances in hysteroscopic instrumentation and procedural techniques have made it possible to perform selected operative hysteroscopies in outpatient settings (consultation office) without general or regional anesthesia. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of outpatient operative hysteroscopy, with similar success rates and complication profiles compared to procedures performed in the operating room, although some studies reported higher levels of pain during outpatient procedures (1-3) . Furthermore, cost-effectiveness studies support outpatient procedures by highlighting reduced hospital resource utilization and shorter recovery times for patients (4-6).
The HOPE study aims to evaluate this practice locally at the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil. This prospective monocentric observational study will include approximately 400 patients over a two-year period (July 2025 - May 2027). The primary objective is to compare the success rates of operative hysteroscopies performed in the operating room versus those performed in an outpatient setting. Secondary objectives include assessment of perioperative and postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, complication rates, and the time to return to work.
Data will be collected from medical records and patient-reported outcomes using a satisfaction questionnaire. Inclusion of patients will follow the usual care pathway, without additional interventions or follow-up beyond standard clinical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Operative hysteroscopy in the operating room
Operative hysteroscopy in the operating room: Procedures performed under general or regional anesthesia in a surgical setting (either ambulatory or conventional hospitalization).
No interventions assigned to this group
Operative hysteroscopy in the outpatient setting
Operative hysteroscopy in the outpatient setting: Procedures performed in a consultation room without general or regional anesthesia, using local anesthesia if needed
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
-⁃ Undergoing operative hysteroscopy for intrauterine pathology
* Able to provid e informed non-opposition
* French-speaking
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Inability to complete follow-up
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHI Créteil - Gynécologie et obstétrique
Créteil, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HOPE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.