Laparoscopic Myomectomy With Morcellation or Transvaginal Extraction of Surgical Specimens.
NCT ID: NCT03570879
Last Updated: 2021-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-05-01
2024-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Despite these validated cornerstones of minimally invasive gynecology, the best approach for specimen retrieval is still debated. Among these approaches, surgical specimen retrieval after laparoscopic myomectomy could be performed by mini-laparotomy, by power morcellation using morcellator inserted through one of the ancillary trocars, or by transvaginal extraction through an endobag inserted at level of the posterior vaginal fornix (between the utero-sacral ligaments).
Unfortunately, mini-laparotomy has poor esthetic outcome and does not conform the current standards of minimally invasive surgery.
In addition, on 24 November 24 2014 the Food and Drug Administration updated a Safety Communication about Power Morcellation, warning against the use of laparoscopic power morcellators in the majority of women undergoing myomectomy or hysterectomy for treatment of fibroids, due to the risk of spreading an unsuspected uterine sarcoma within the abdomen and pelvis.
Considering this scenario, transvaginal extraction may represents a feasible approach for specimen retrieval. In this view, the current study aims to retrospectively compare surgical outcomes in women that underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with subsequent power morcellation (before the issuing of the abovementioned Safety Communication by the Food and Drug Administration) or transvaginal extraction (after the issuing of the abovementioned Safety Communication by the Food and Drug Administration) of the surgical specimens.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pregnancy Outcomes Following Myomectomy
NCT06474065
Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Morcellation: Clinical Efficacy and Safety Outcomes
NCT02086435
Evaluation of a Hysteroscopic Method With Vaporization in the Hysteroscopic Treatment of Submucosal Uterine Fibroids
NCT05078307
Evaluation of a Hysteroscopic Morcellator in Hysteroscopic Treatment of Submucosal Fibroids
NCT02406898
Predictive Factors for Complete Myoma Resection During Hysteroscopic Myomectomy
NCT04400942
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Power morcellation
Women that underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with subsequent power morcellation of the surgical specimens.
Power morcellation
Power morcellation of surgical specimens after laparoscopic myomectomy.
Transvaginal extraction
Women that underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with subsequent transvaginal extraction of the surgical specimens.
Transvaginal extraction
Transvaginal extraction of surgical specimens after laparoscopic myomectomy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Power morcellation
Power morcellation of surgical specimens after laparoscopic myomectomy.
Transvaginal extraction
Transvaginal extraction of surgical specimens after laparoscopic myomectomy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Women with obliteration of the cul-de-sac.
* Women with the suspected cancer of gynecological origin.
* Women who had never experienced complete sexual intercourse before the operation.
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Antonio Simone Laganà
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio Simone Laganà, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Jvan Casarin, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Antonella Cromi, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Fabio Ghezzi, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MYMOTE-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.