Laparoscopic Myomectomy With Morcellation or Transvaginal Extraction of Surgical Specimens.

NCT ID: NCT03570879

Last Updated: 2021-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-01

Study Completion Date

2024-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic myomectomy represents the fertility-sparing gold standard approach for the management of subserosal and intramural uterine myomas: this technique allows faster recovery, less complications and improved surgical outcomes than laparotomy.

Despite these validated cornerstones of minimally invasive gynecology, the best approach for specimen retrieval is still debated. Among these approaches, surgical specimen retrieval after laparoscopic myomectomy could be performed by mini-laparotomy, by power morcellation using morcellator inserted through one of the ancillary trocars, or by transvaginal extraction through an endobag inserted at level of the posterior vaginal fornix (between the utero-sacral ligaments).

Unfortunately, mini-laparotomy has poor esthetic outcome and does not conform the current standards of minimally invasive surgery.

In addition, on 24 November 24 2014 the Food and Drug Administration updated a Safety Communication about Power Morcellation, warning against the use of laparoscopic power morcellators in the majority of women undergoing myomectomy or hysterectomy for treatment of fibroids, due to the risk of spreading an unsuspected uterine sarcoma within the abdomen and pelvis.

Considering this scenario, transvaginal extraction may represents a feasible approach for specimen retrieval. In this view, the current study aims to retrospectively compare surgical outcomes in women that underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with subsequent power morcellation (before the issuing of the abovementioned Safety Communication by the Food and Drug Administration) or transvaginal extraction (after the issuing of the abovementioned Safety Communication by the Food and Drug Administration) of the surgical specimens.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myoma;Uterus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Power morcellation

Women that underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with subsequent power morcellation of the surgical specimens.

Power morcellation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Power morcellation of surgical specimens after laparoscopic myomectomy.

Transvaginal extraction

Women that underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with subsequent transvaginal extraction of the surgical specimens.

Transvaginal extraction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transvaginal extraction of surgical specimens after laparoscopic myomectomy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Power morcellation

Power morcellation of surgical specimens after laparoscopic myomectomy.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transvaginal extraction

Transvaginal extraction of surgical specimens after laparoscopic myomectomy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women affected by single or multiple uterine myomas.
* Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Human papilloma virus-related pathologies at pap-smear within the 12 months preceding surgery.
* Women with obliteration of the cul-de-sac.
* Women with the suspected cancer of gynecological origin.
* Women who had never experienced complete sexual intercourse before the operation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Antonio Simone Laganà

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antonio Simone Laganà, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

Jvan Casarin, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

Antonella Cromi, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

Fabio Ghezzi, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Antonio Simone Laganà, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+393296279579

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MYMOTE-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Hysteroscopic Morcellator (HM).
NCT01537822 COMPLETED NA
Efficacy of In-bag Morcellation
NCT03281460 COMPLETED NA