Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Spontaneous Confabulation
NCT ID: NCT02540772
Last Updated: 2016-03-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-04-30
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Spontaneous Confabulation: a Replica Study
NCT03183453
An Executive/Monitoring Treatment Protocol on Everyday Life Activities
NCT03958487
Personality Traits as a Variable in the Recovery of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury
NCT07119827
Non-Pharmacological Treatments and Cognitive Impairment (NPT-CI2019)
NCT04118686
Neural Markers and Rehabilitation of Executive Functioning in Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
NCT01410721
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neuropsychological treatment
The tested treatment is a combination of neuropsychological rehabilitation procedures: learning, episodic memory recall after a delay, selective attention, inhibition of predominant responses and awareness of deficits.
Neuropsychological treatment
Participants had to learn some brief material (words, faces, pictures, news), after which they were asked for an immediate and a delayed recall. After both recalls, participants were confronted with feedback about correct responses, non-responses and errors (i.e., confabulations and errors of attribution). This type of feedback worked on: 1) selective attention during the learning phase, training patients to focus on the relevant details of the stimuli; 2) monitoring processes during the retrieval phase, reinforcing the strategic search and training patients to inhibit traces that were irrelevant; and 3) memory control processes after the retrieval phase. The treatment consisted of 9 sessions and lasted for 3 weeks and the participants performed a baseline before and after treatment.
No treatment
Patients in the control group only performed the baselines.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neuropsychological treatment
Participants had to learn some brief material (words, faces, pictures, news), after which they were asked for an immediate and a delayed recall. After both recalls, participants were confronted with feedback about correct responses, non-responses and errors (i.e., confabulations and errors of attribution). This type of feedback worked on: 1) selective attention during the learning phase, training patients to focus on the relevant details of the stimuli; 2) monitoring processes during the retrieval phase, reinforcing the strategic search and training patients to inhibit traces that were irrelevant; and 3) memory control processes after the retrieval phase. The treatment consisted of 9 sessions and lasted for 3 weeks and the participants performed a baseline before and after treatment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The presence of momentary confabulations in the Spanish adaptation of Dalla Barba provoked confabulation interview.
* Prior to injury, all patients should be completely independent for daily living.
Exclusion Criteria
* Dementia.
* Acute confusional state.
* A history of alcohol or drug abuse.
* Psychiatric antecedents.
35 Years
86 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Monica Triviño Mosquera
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Monica Triviño Mosquera
Psychology PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Monica Triviño, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
San Rafael University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
San Rafael University Hospital
Granada, Granada, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gilboa A, Alain C, Stuss DT, Melo B, Miller S, Moscovitch M. Mechanisms of spontaneous confabulations: a strategic retrieval account. Brain. 2006 Jun;129(Pt 6):1399-414. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl093. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
Moscovitch M, Melo B. Strategic retrieval and the frontal lobes: evidence from confabulation and amnesia. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jul;35(7):1017-34. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00028-6.
Schnider A. The confabulating mind. How the brain creates reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Nahum L, Bouzerda-Wahlen A, Guggisberg A, Ptak R, Schnider A. Forms of confabulation: dissociations and associations. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Aug;50(10):2524-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.026. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
Ciaramelli E, Ghetti S, Borsotti M. Divided attention during retrieval suppresses false recognition in confabulation. Cortex. 2009 Feb;45(2):141-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
Dayus B, Van den Broek MD. Treatment of stable delusional confabulations using self-monitoring training. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2000; 10(4):415-427.
Del Grosso Destreri N, Farina E, Calabrese E, Pinardi G, Imbornone E, Mariani C. Frontal impairment and confabulation after herpes simplex encephalitis: A case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Mar;83(3):423-6. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.29646.
Dalla Barba G, Decaix C. "Do you remember what you did on March 13, 1985?" A case study of confabulatory hypermnesia. Cortex. 2009 May;45(5):566-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Conf-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.