Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
65 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-01
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility Testing of Cognitive Strategy Training in Post-Concussive Syndrome
NCT04681742
Cognitive Rehabilitation for Long COVID
NCT05676047
Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy for COVID-19
NCT06086379
Long COVID Brain Fog: Cognitive Rehabilitation Trial
NCT06095297
tDCS and Metacognitive Strategy Training in Stroke
NCT05248178
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The CO-OP approach is an MCST intervention in which participants are taught a general cognitive strategy that can be applied in known and novel contexts to devise task specific strategies for engaging in an activity. Existing evidence with other populations suggests that CO-OP has more of a positive effect on improving activity performance and cognition than remediation/retraining-based approaches. These effects have been demonstrated in individuals with mild cognitive impairment that mirrors that found in PCS. The overall research hypothesis is that CO-OP can feasibly be administered remotely and will improve activity performance, subjective and objective cognitive function, and quality of life in individuals with PCS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP)
Each CO-OP session will last 45 minutes and subjects will complete one session per week over the course of 10 weeks. All sessions will be delivered remotely via the Zoom platform.
CO-OP Procedures
CO-OP is a metacognitive strategy training intervention that will be used in this study. First, five functional, everyday life goals are identified collaboratively by the participant and interventionist. In the second meeting, we introduce the approach to the subject and teach the global cognitive strategy (i.e., GOAL-PLAN-DO-CHECK). In all subsequent sessions, this strategy is used as the main problem-solving framework to facilitate skill acquisition.The subject identifies a GOAL, and then is guided by the therapist to discover a PLAN to potentially achieve the goal. The subject is then asked to DO the plan (if feasible during the therapy session otherwise asked to complete at home prior to the next treatment session), and subsequently to CHECK to see if the plan worked, i.e. the goal was achieved. This process is repeated until satisfactory performance is met for each established goal.
Inactive Control Group
Subjects will complete one session per week over the course of 10 weeks. All sessions will be delivered remotely via the Zoom platform.
Inactive Control Group
An inactive control group will be used to control for maturation and testing effects. Weekly contact will be made via teleconferencing to (1) maintain study engagement, (2) introduce weekly social contact with researchers, mimicking some of the potential incidental effects of the experimental group, and (3) ascertain what, if any, additional steps participants have taken to reduce PCS symptoms. The content of each of these meetings will be tracked in intervention notes. Each contact will be recorded for fidelity monitoring to ensure all active ingredients of the CO-OP intervention are avoided.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CO-OP Procedures
CO-OP is a metacognitive strategy training intervention that will be used in this study. First, five functional, everyday life goals are identified collaboratively by the participant and interventionist. In the second meeting, we introduce the approach to the subject and teach the global cognitive strategy (i.e., GOAL-PLAN-DO-CHECK). In all subsequent sessions, this strategy is used as the main problem-solving framework to facilitate skill acquisition.The subject identifies a GOAL, and then is guided by the therapist to discover a PLAN to potentially achieve the goal. The subject is then asked to DO the plan (if feasible during the therapy session otherwise asked to complete at home prior to the next treatment session), and subsequently to CHECK to see if the plan worked, i.e. the goal was achieved. This process is repeated until satisfactory performance is met for each established goal.
Inactive Control Group
An inactive control group will be used to control for maturation and testing effects. Weekly contact will be made via teleconferencing to (1) maintain study engagement, (2) introduce weekly social contact with researchers, mimicking some of the potential incidental effects of the experimental group, and (3) ascertain what, if any, additional steps participants have taken to reduce PCS symptoms. The content of each of these meetings will be tracked in intervention notes. Each contact will be recorded for fidelity monitoring to ensure all active ingredients of the CO-OP intervention are avoided.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* self-identified activity performance goals per the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
* documented prior diagnosis of COVID-19
* read, write, and speak English fluently
* ability to provide valid informed electronic consent
Exclusion Criteria
* dementia symptoms as indicated by a score of \<23 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
* untreated sleep apnea (≥5 on the STOPBANG)
* prior cancer treatment
* severe depressive symptoms (\>21 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
University of Missouri-Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anna Boone
Assistant Professor, Occupational Therapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna E Boone, PhD, OTR/L
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Missouri Occupational Therapy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Missouri Department of Occupational Therapy
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McEwen S, Polatajko H, Baum C, Rios J, Cirone D, Doherty M, Wolf T. Combined Cognitive-Strategy and Task-Specific Training Improve Transfer to Untrained Activities in Subacute Stroke: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Jul;29(6):526-36. doi: 10.1177/1545968314558602. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
Geusgens CA, van Heugten CM, Cooijmans JP, Jolles J, van den Heuvel WJ. Transfer effects of a cognitive strategy training for stroke patients with apraxia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 Nov;29(8):831-41. doi: 10.1080/13803390601125971.
Haskins EC, Cicerone KD, Trexler LE. Cognitive rehabilitation manual: Translating evidence-based recommendations into practice. ACRM Publishing; 2012.
Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, Langenbahn DM, Felicetti T, Kneipp S, Ellmo W, Kalmar K, Giacino JT, Harley JP, Laatsch L, Morse PA, Catanese J. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Aug;86(8):1681-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024.
Dawson DR, Anderson ND, Burgess P, Cooper E, Krpan KM, Stuss DT. Further development of the Multiple Errands Test: standardized scoring, reliability, and ecological validity for the Baycrest version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;90(11 Suppl):S41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.012.
Wolf TJ, Polatajko H, Baum C, Rios J, Cirone D, Doherty M, McEwen S. Combined Cognitive-Strategy and Task-Specific Training Affects Cognition and Upper-Extremity Function in Subacute Stroke: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr;70(2):7002290010p1-7002290010p10. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.017293.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Informed Consent Form Only
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2096158
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.