Port Size and Post-Operative Pain Perception by Patients
NCT ID: NCT02521987
Last Updated: 2018-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-01
2017-11-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mobile Educations Effect on Pain Outcomes
NCT03301610
The Relationship Between Central Sensitization, Pain, and Psychosocial Factors in Individuals With Lipedema
NCT07240285
Pain Education Added to Conventional Physiotherapy Program for Patients With Neck Pain
NCT05210257
Conditioned Pain Modulation in Localized vs Widespread Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05972395
The Effect of Structured Pain Education on Pain and Performance Parameters in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05331274
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is a paucity of research comparing different port sizes as they relate to participate pain and operative time especially in a randomized controlled trial setting. The investigators goal would be to determine if there is a difference in pain perception by patients when the assistant port size varies by 50% (8 mm to 12 mm).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
8mm Port
Participates will be randomized to have an 8 mm assistant port used during their surgery. The participate will be asked to specify the point that represents their level of perceived pain intensity and mark it on the scale at four time points: baseline pain prior to the procedure in the pre-operatively holding area, 4 to 6 hours post operatively, on Post Operative Day 1 (POD1). The final pain assessment will be at the two weeks postoperative clinic visit.
8mm port
Participate in this arm will have their procedure performed with an 8mm laparoscopic port.
12mm Port
Participates will be randomized to have an 12mm assistant port used during their surgery. The participate will be asked to specify the point that represents their level of perceived pain intensity and mark it on the scale at four time points: baseline pain prior to the procedure in the pre-operatively holding area, 4 to 6 hours post operatively, on Post Operative Day 1 (POD1). The final pain assessment will be at the two weeks postoperative clinic visit.
12mm port
Participate in this arm will have their procedure performed with a 12mm laparoscopic port.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
8mm port
Participate in this arm will have their procedure performed with an 8mm laparoscopic port.
12mm port
Participate in this arm will have their procedure performed with a 12mm laparoscopic port.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* proficiency in English .
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous participation/randomization in the study at a previous visit
* Pregnant women cannot participate
* History of abdominal wall pain
* Chronic pain patients
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Loyola University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elizabeth Mueller
M.D., Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elizabeth R Mueller, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Loyola University Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D; Women's Health Initiative. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;104(3):489-97. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000136100.10818.d8.
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6.
Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394.
McDermott CD, Hale DS. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2009 Sep;36(3):585-614. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2009.09.004.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
207726
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.