Zoledronic Acid to Maintain Bone Mass After Denosumab Discontinuation

NCT ID: NCT02499237

Last Updated: 2019-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-11-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In contrast with bisphosphonates,discontinuation of denosumab results in gradual loss of bone mineral density gains. The investigators aim to evaluate whether in patients treated with denosumab, a single zoledronic acid infusion would prevent the anticipated bone loss.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Discontinuation of denosumab results in a rebound rise of bone turnover markers and gradual loss of the achieved bone mineral density gains. In contrast, bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid, remain within the skeleton acting for several months or even years after discontinuation while maintaining bone mineral density despite the cessation of treatment. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate changes in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck, as well as in bone turnover markers one year after treatment discontinuation both in denosumab-treated women and in denosumab-treated women who switched to zoledronic acid infusion one year before treatment discontinuation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Denosumab

Patients with low bone mass, being treated only with denosumab in the past, who will receive another year of treatment with denosumab and subsequently discontinue treatment for one year

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Denosumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment of low bone mass with subcutaneous injections of denosumab 60 mg every 6 months for one year

Denosumab plus zoledronic acid

Patients with low bone mass, being treated only with denosumab in the past, who will receive a single infusion of zoledronic acid and subsequently discontinue treatment for another year

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Zoledronic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment of low bone mass with a single infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg for one year

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Denosumab

Treatment of low bone mass with subcutaneous injections of denosumab 60 mg every 6 months for one year

Intervention Type DRUG

Zoledronic acid

Treatment of low bone mass with a single infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg for one year

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Prolia Aclasta

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* postmenopausal women
* osteopenic (T-score \> -2.5 but \< -1.0) after treatment with denosumab

Exclusion Criteria

* secondary osteoporosis;
* diseases that could affect bone metabolism;
* medications that could affect bone metabolism;
* history of any antiosteoporotic treatment other than denosumab prior to randomization
* severe liver or kidney disease (creatinine clearance \< 60ml/min/1.73m2)
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Leiden University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

424 General Military Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Athanasios D. Anastasilakis

Consultant of Endocrinology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Athanasios D Anastasilakis, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

424 General Military Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Polyzois Makras, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

251 Airforce and VA General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

251 Airforce & VA General Hospital

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

424 General Military Hospital

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Greece

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Miller PD, Bolognese MA, Lewiecki EM, McClung MR, Ding B, Austin M, Liu Y, San Martin J. Effect of denosumab on bone density and turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass after long-term continued, discontinued, and restarting of therapy: a randomized blinded phase 2 clinical trial. Bone. 2008 Aug;43(2):222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18539106 (View on PubMed)

Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, Kendler DL, Miller PD, Yang YC, Grazette L, San Martin J, Gallagher JC. Effects of denosumab treatment and discontinuation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Apr;96(4):972-80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1502. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21289258 (View on PubMed)

Black DM, Bauer DC, Schwartz AV, Cummings SR, Rosen CJ. Continuing bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis--for whom and for how long? N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2051-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1202623. Epub 2012 May 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22571169 (View on PubMed)

Whitaker M, Guo J, Kehoe T, Benson G. Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis--where do we go from here? N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2048-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1202619. Epub 2012 May 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22571168 (View on PubMed)

Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, Yavropoulou MP, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Ntenti C, Mandanas S, Papatheodorou A, Makras P. Comparative Effect of Zoledronate at 6 Versus 18 Months Following Denosumab Discontinuation. Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 May;108(5):587-594. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00785-1. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33386953 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AfterDmab

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.