Step-down Therapy After Long-term Osteoporosis Treatment

NCT ID: NCT07281586

Last Updated: 2025-12-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2028-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Maintaining bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuing denosumab (Prolia) is a major clinical challenge, as rapid bone loss commonly occurs when treatment is stopped, especially after more than three years of use. Standard sequential therapy with bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid (Aclasta) often fails to fully prevent BMD decline, and most bone loss occurs within the first year, making effective suppression of the rebound effect essential.

This study investigates whether a de-escalation strategy-using half-dose denosumab (30 mg every six months) combined with sequential zoledronic acid-can better preserve lumbar spine BMD after long-term denosumab therapy. Eligible participants include postmenopausal women and men ≥50 years old with osteoporosis or osteopenia-related fractures who have received ≥3 years of denosumab.

The open-label trial applies stratified randomization based on denosumab duration (\<4 years vs. ≥4 years), assigning 22 participants to each group.

Control group: standard therapy with one zoledronic acid infusion at the end of denosumab's effect and a second infusion one year later.

Intervention group: half-dose denosumab plus zoledronic acid at study entry, a second half-dose denosumab injection at six months, and a second zoledronic acid infusion at twelve months.

The study aims to determine whether this combined tapering-plus-bisphosphonate approach more effectively prevents lumbar spine BMD loss compared with conventional sequential therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Effective maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD) after discontinuing denosumab (Prolia) remains a major clinical challenge. Although denosumab is highly effective in increasing BMD, patients frequently discontinue therapy due to issues such as adherence, comorbidities, or personal circumstances. This interruption can lead to rapid and profound bone loss, substantially increasing fracture risk. Current clinical consensus recommends follow-on bisphosphonate therapy-most commonly alendronate (Fosamax) or zoledronic acid (Aclasta)-after the pharmacologic effect of denosumab wears off. However, evidence indicates that in patients treated with denosumab for more than three years, conventional bisphosphonate transition alone is often insufficient to fully prevent post-discontinuation BMD decline. Importantly, most bone loss occurs within the first year after stopping denosumab, highlighting the urgent need for strategies that can suppress the rebound increase in bone turnover during this critical period.

This study aims to investigate whether a dose-reduction (de-escalation) strategy-administering half-dose denosumab (30 mg every six months) combined with sequential zoledronic acid therapy-can better preserve lumbar spine BMD after long-term denosumab treatment. The target population includes (1) postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia-associated fractures who have received at least three years of denosumab treatment, and (2) men aged ≥50 years with osteoporosis or osteopenia-associated fractures and ≥3 years of denosumab therapy.

The study uses an open-label, stratified randomized trial design. After enrollment, participants are stratified according to total duration of prior denosumab use: \<4 years or ≥4 years. Within each stratum, participants are randomized into two groups, with 22 participants per group.

Control Group (Standard Sequential Therapy):

Participants receive conventional post-denosumab management. A single infusion of zoledronic acid is administered at the expected end of denosumab's pharmacologic effect, followed by a second zoledronic acid infusion one year later (±1 week).

Intervention Group (De-escalation + Bisphosphonate Strategy):

At study entry, participants receive a half-dose denosumab injection (expected duration of effect: six months) concurrently with one dose of zoledronic acid. Six months later (±1 week), participants receive a second half-dose denosumab injection. At twelve months after enrollment (±1 week), a second zoledronic acid infusion is administered.

This investigational regimen is designed to gradually taper denosumab exposure while simultaneously initiating bisphosphonate therapy to stabilize bone turnover. By providing partial RANKL inhibition during the early high-risk period and reinforcing mineralization with zoledronic acid, the study aims to determine whether this combined approach can more effectively mitigate the rebound effect and prevent lumbar spine BMD loss.

The results of this trial will help clarify whether a structured de-escalation plus bisphosphonate strategy offers superior protection compared with standard transition therapy in patients with long-term denosumab exposure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Zoledronate is given 6 months after the final denosumab injection, with a second zoledronate infusion administered 18 months after the last denosumab dose.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

zoledronate

Intervention Type DRUG

In the control arm, participants will receive zoledronate at trial entry, with a second dose administered at the start of the second year

Denosumab De-escalation + Zoledronate

Half-dose denosumab plus zoledronic acid at 6 months after the last denosumab dose, followed by a second half-dose denosumab injection at 12 months and a second zoledronic acid infusion at 18 months after the final denosumab dose.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

zoledronate

Intervention Type DRUG

In the intervention arm, participants will receive zoledronate at trial entry, with a second dose administered at the start of the second year.

Denosumab De-escalation

Intervention Type DRUG

In the intervention arm, participants will receive a half-dose of denosumab at trial entry, followed by a second half-dose 6 months later during the first year.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

zoledronate

In the intervention arm, participants will receive zoledronate at trial entry, with a second dose administered at the start of the second year.

Intervention Type DRUG

Denosumab De-escalation

In the intervention arm, participants will receive a half-dose of denosumab at trial entry, followed by a second half-dose 6 months later during the first year.

Intervention Type DRUG

zoledronate

In the control arm, participants will receive zoledronate at trial entry, with a second dose administered at the start of the second year

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Postmenopausal women aged ≥50 and ≤85 years with osteoporosis- or osteopenia-related fractures who have received denosumab (Prolia) continuously for at least 3 years, with no dosing interval exceeding 9 months; and men aged ≥50 and ≤85 years with osteoporosis- or osteopenia-related fractures who have received continuous denosumab (Prolia) therapy for at least 3 years, with dosing intervals not exceeding 9 months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Secondary osteoporosis Metabolic bone diseases Active or prior malignancy Ongoing systemic glucocorticoid therapy Current use of hormone replacement therapy Use of any medications that affect bone metabolism Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 50 mL/min/1.73 m² Known hypersensitivity to zoledronic acid Hypocalcemia Any other contraindications to zoledronic acid use
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch

Douliu, Taiwan, Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shau-Huai Fu, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+886972655734

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Shau-Huai Fu

Role: primary

0972655734

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202412063MINE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.