The Effect of Zoledronate on the Prevention of Pneumonia in Hip Fracture Patients

NCT ID: NCT05743179

Last Updated: 2024-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

2692 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-05

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs; such as alendronate and zoledronate) are commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention, in which zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. In 2018, our real-world propensity score matched study showed that the use of N-BPs was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in hip fracture patients. In addition to cardiovascular diseases, both preclinical study and sensitivity analysis also suggest evidence for N-BPs in pneumonia prevention. Moreover, a pragmatic clinical trial is developed to evaluate effect of the tested intervention in real-life routine clinical practice since traditional explanatory radomised controlled trial (RCT) may have poor generalizability due to highly selected patients and controlled environments. This study aims to evaluate if zoledronate reduces risk of pneumonia in hip fracture patients using pragmatic clinical trial approach.

This is an open-label, multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Patients will be recruited from 4 hospitals, namely Caritas Medical Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Queen Mary Hospital, and United Christian Hospital. Age, sex, body mass index, eGFR, history of fracture, chronic respiratory diseases, and other medical history, will be measured and recorded at recruitment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

N-BPs are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention. Although alendronate is the first-line antiosteoporosis medication in many countries, it is associated with esophageal and gastrointestinal irritation. In addition, the regimen for alendronate is one tablet per week and careful use of alendronate is required to avoid gastrointestinal irritation (e.g. take the tablet on an empty stomach, stay upright for at least 30 minutes after taking the medication), leading to relative low drug compliance. On the other hand, the regimen of zoledronate is 5mg infusion once a year. Since the route of administration is intravenous infusion, it avoids the gastrointestinal irritation problem. In terms of fracture prevention, zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. Most importantly, previous HORIZON recurrent fracture trial showed that zoledronate use reduced risk of mortality in addition to fracture prevention. Thus, zoledronate is considered the most efficacious N-BP in clinical use.

N-BPs could exert extra-skeletal beneficial effects. In 2018, our real-world propensity score matched study (N=34,991) using the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS), a clinical database managed by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority, showed that use of N-BPs was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in hip fracture patients. Later in the same year, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 2,000 osteopenic women showed that zoledronate may reduce risk of myocardial infarction with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.36-1.02) after following up for 6 years. They subsequently performed a detailed post-hoc analysis and showed that zoledronate use was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction, composite cardiovascular end-point, and fatal stroke. This example demonstrated not only the extra-skeletal effect of N-BPs, but also showed that high-quality real-world data with state-of-the-art statistical method could potentially be useful in causal inference.

In addition to cardiovascular diseases, N-BPs may be useful in preventing pneumonia. Preclinical study showed that N-BPs are anti-inflammatory and may modulate macrophages in response to pneumonia. In addition, pharmacokinetic studies showed that the highest concentration of N-BPs was detected in trachea other than bone after oral ingestion or intravenous infusion of N-BPs. Among various N-BPs, alendronate was detected in the trachea with a concentration of 607 ng/ml 72 hours after oral ingestion, which was almost half of the concentration (1370 ng/ml) detected in vertebrae. Thus, we conducted a real-world population-based propensity score matched study in a cohort of 54,047 hip fracture patients to investigate the association of N-BP use with risk of pneumonia. Among hip fracture patients, N-BP use was significantly associated with 24% risk reduction in pneumonia (hazard ratio \[HR\]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval \[CI\]: 0.70-0.83), with an absolute risk difference of 2%. Similar significant association was observed for pneumonia mortality. To further reduce the potential bias of confounding by indication, we performed a sensitivity analysis by including users of other anti-osteoporosis medications in the control group, instead of patients without using any anti-osteoporosis medications. A similar significant association was observed. In agreement with the preclinical studies, we provided evidence for N-BPs in pneumonia prevention. This finding attracted wide media coverage, including Reuters and the New York Times.

Although utilisation of real-world data is an emerging approach in evaluating drug effectiveness, RCT is still considered the gold standard in evaluating drug efficacy. However, traditional explanatory RCT may have poor generalizability due to highly selected patients and controlled environments. Thus, pragmatic clinical trial is developed to evaluate if the tested intervention is effective in real-life routine clinical practice, by reducing bias using randomization and improving generalizability using real-world setting. We aim to evaluate if zoledronate reduces risk of pneumonia in hip fracture patients using pragmatic clinical trial approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Zoledronate

Zoledronate intravenous infusion (5mg) once and usual care will be provided to the patient and mark the start of 12-month follow-up period

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Zoledronate

Intervention Type DRUG

Aclasta Solution for Infusion 5mg/100ml (zoledronic acid)

Control

Only usual care will be provided to the patient with 12-month follow-up period.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Zoledronate

Aclasta Solution for Infusion 5mg/100ml (zoledronic acid)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Zoledronic acid Aclasta

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female ≥ 60 years
* With recent fragility hip fracture at proximal femur
* Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent, including consent for the use and discloser of research-related health information, and comply with the study data collection procedures. Provide signed and dated informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Known to be hypersensitive to any N-BPs
* Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body surface area
* Regular user of anti-osteoporosis medications (including bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatides, and raloxifene) or oral or intravenous systemic glucocorticoids in the previous year.
* Subject currently involved in a clinical trial or in an exclusion period following participation in another clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

United Christian Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kathryn Tan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

United Christian Hospital

Kwun Tong, , Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Caritas Medical Centre

Sham Shui Po, , Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Prince of Wales Hospital

Shatin, , Hong Kong

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Tai Po Hospital

Tai Po, , Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+852 2831-5080

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD

Role: primary

+852 2831-5080

Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD

Role: primary

+852 2831-5080

Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD

Role: primary

+852 2831-5080

Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD

Role: primary

+852 2831-5080

Ching-Lung Cheung, PhD

Role: primary

+852 2831-5080

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Zoo-P_001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Denosumab Sequential Therapy
NCT03868033 COMPLETED PHASE4