The SUN Clinical Trial (Safety Utilizing NUsurface Meniscus Implant)
NCT ID: NCT02483988
Last Updated: 2023-04-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
NUsurface Implant Registry
NCT03953846
Verifying the Effectiveness of the NUsurface® System
NCT02108496
Treatment of the Medial Meniscus With the NUsurface(R) Meniscus Implant
NCT01712191
The VENUS Clinical Study (Verifying the Effectiveness of the NUsurface® System)
NCT02136901
NuShield in Surgical Peroneal Tendon Repair
NCT03828916
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NUsurface Meniscus Implant
All eligible patients will receive the NUsurface® Meniscus Implant.
NUsurface® Meniscus Implant
The NUsurface® Meniscus Implant is a Polycarbonate-Urethane (PCU)-based device reinforced with high tensile Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers. The product is available in different sizes, left and right, and with trials so as to allow the surgeon several size options for implantation. The NUsurface® Meniscus Implant, is designed to be conceptually analogous to the natural meniscus whose structural characteristics include a highly orientated collagen fiber network that supports the large hoop stresses to produce better distribution of contact pressures within the knee joint. Restoring the distribution of joint loads post-meniscectomy is thought to reducing joint overload and to reducing pain.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NUsurface® Meniscus Implant
The NUsurface® Meniscus Implant is a Polycarbonate-Urethane (PCU)-based device reinforced with high tensile Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers. The product is available in different sizes, left and right, and with trials so as to allow the surgeon several size options for implantation. The NUsurface® Meniscus Implant, is designed to be conceptually analogous to the natural meniscus whose structural characteristics include a highly orientated collagen fiber network that supports the large hoop stresses to produce better distribution of contact pressures within the knee joint. Restoring the distribution of joint loads post-meniscectomy is thought to reducing joint overload and to reducing pain.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Has a KOOS Pain of ≤ 75 (100 being the highest attainable and no pain)
3. Is between age 30 and 75 years (inclusive) at the time of study treatment
4. Has neutral alignment ±5º of the mechanical axis, as measured from the angle formed by a line drawn from the center of the femoral head to the medial tibial spine and a line drawn from the medial tibial spine and the center of the ankle joint
5. Has ≥ 2 mm intact medial meniscal rim capable of being fitted with a NUsurface® device
6. Is able to do the study required follow-up visits, questionnaires, X-rays and MRI's
7. Is able to read and understand the English language if treated at a U.S. site or read and understand one of the official country languages if treated at a site Outside the U.S.
8. Is able and willing to understand and sign the Informed Consent Form
Exclusion Criteria
2. Has evidence of a Outerbridge Grade IV cartilage loss on the medial tibial plateau or femoral condyle that potentially could contact a NUsurface implant (e.g., a focal lesion \> 0.5 cm2 correlating to a circular defect of \> 8 mm in diameter)
3. Has complete disruption of the posterior root attachment of the meniscus
4. Has lateral compartment pain and Grade III or Grade IV Outerbridge cartilage score in the lateral compartment
5. Has a varus or valgus knee deformity \> 5º requiring a tibial or femoral osteotomy
6. Has a laxity level of more than Grade II (IKDC), primary or secondary to an injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and/or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and/or lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and/or medial collateral ligament (MCL)
7. Has significant trochlear dysplasia, patellar instability or symptomatic patellar misalignment
8. Has patellar compartment pain and Grade III or Grade IV Outerbridge cartilage score in the patellar compartment.
9. Compared to a normal knee, has obvious radiological evidence of medial femoral squaring, anatomical variance in the medial tibial plateau, or irregularly shaped cartilage surface
10. Had an ACL reconstruction performed \< 9 months prior to study treatment
11. Has a BMI \> 32.5 at the start of study treatment
12. Decides to receive (if eligible and an option) allograft medial meniscus transplantation
13. Received any type of prosthetic knee implant made of artificial non-resorbable plastic, metal or ceramic, not including the NUsurface® Meniscus Implant
14. Has a knee flexion contracture \> 10º
15. Has flexion \< 90º
16. Had a previous medial femoral condyle surgery (not including microfracture) or High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO)
17. Has insufficiency fractures or avascular necrosis of the medial compartment
18. Has an active infection or tumor (local or systemic)
19. Has any type of knee joint inflammatory disease including Sjogren's syndrome
20. Has neuropathic knee osteoarthropathy, also known as Charcot joint
21. Has any medical condition that does not allow possible arthroscopy of the knee
22. Has neurological deficit (sensory, motor, or reflex)
23. Is currently involved in another investigation of the lower extremity
24. Anticipates having another lower extremity surgery during the study period
25. Is contraindicated for hyaluronic acid injections (i.e., patients with known hypersensitivity \[allergy\] to hyaluronan \[sodium hyaluoronate\] preparations); patients having knee joint infections or skin diseases or infections in the site of possible injections
26. Is contraindicated for corticosteroid injections (i.e., patients with allergy to any of the components or with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura)
27. Has received any corticosteroid knee injections ≤ 3 months prior to study treatment
28. Has chondrocalcinosis
29. Is on immunostimulating or immunosuppressing agents
30. Has ipsilateral or contralateral lower limb joint conditions that may affect ambulation or KOOS (e.g. have a leg length discrepancy \> 2.5 cm \[1 inch\], causing a noticeable limp)
31. Is a female who is lactating, expecting, or is intending to become pregnant during the study period
32. Is an active smoker
33. Is mentally incapacitated (incapable of appraising or controlling conduct) or have mental disability (e.g., dementia or Alzheimer's)
34. Is a prisoner
35. Is a patient who has economic incentive not to improve
36. Certain patient populations that are at high risk for poor healing or outcomes such as patients who have a co-morbidity that reduces life expectancy to less than 36 months
37. Patients who are contraindicated for MRI (i.e., pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implants, etc.)
30 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Active Implants
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard W Treharne, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Active Implants LLC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Banner University Medical Center Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Horizon Clinical Research
La Mesa, California, United States
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
Long Beach, California, United States
St Mary's Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
CU Sports Medicine
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Advanced Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine Specialists
Denver, Colorado, United States
OrthoIndy
Greenwood, Indiana, United States
Baton Rouge Orthopaedic Clinic
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Ochsner Sports Medicine Institute
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Sports Medicine Oregon
Portland, Oregon, United States
Arlington Orthopedic Associates, PA
Arlington, Texas, United States
Comprehensive Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
OrthoVirginia
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
De Coninck T, Elsner JJ, Linder-Ganz E, Cromheecke M, Shemesh M, Huysse W, Verdonk R, Verstraete K, Verdonk P. In-vivo evaluation of the kinematic behavior of an artificial medial meniscus implant: A pilot study using open-MRI. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014 Sep;29(8):898-905. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
Shemesh M, Asher R, Zylberberg E, Guilak F, Linder-Ganz E, Elsner JJ. Viscoelastic properties of a synthetic meniscus implant. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
Zur G, Linder-Ganz E, Elsner JJ, Shani J, Brenner O, Agar G, Hershman EB, Arnoczky SP, Guilak F, Shterling A. Chondroprotective effects of a polycarbonate-urethane meniscal implant: histopathological results in a sheep model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Feb;19(2):255-63. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1210-5. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
Elsner JJ, Portnoy S, Guilak F, Shterling A, Linder-Ganz E. MRI-based characterization of bone anatomy in the human knee for size matching of a medial meniscal implant. J Biomech Eng. 2010 Oct;132(10):101008. doi: 10.1115/1.4002490.
Elsner JJ, Portnoy S, Zur G, Guilak F, Shterling A, Linder-Ganz E. Design of a free-floating polycarbonate-urethane meniscal implant using finite element modeling and experimental validation. J Biomech Eng. 2010 Sep;132(9):095001. doi: 10.1115/1.4001892.
Linder-Ganz E, Elsner JJ, Danino A, Guilak F, Shterling A. A novel quantitative approach for evaluating contact mechanics of meniscal replacements. J Biomech Eng. 2010 Feb;132(2):024501. doi: 10.1115/1.4000407.
Elsner JJ, Shemesh M, Shefy-Peleg A, Gabet Y, Zylberberg E, Linder-Ganz E. Quantification of in vitro wear of a synthetic meniscus implant using gravimetric and micro-CT measurements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Sep;49:310-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 May 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00571
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.