A Clinical Registry of Orthobiologics Procedures

NCT ID: NCT03011398

Last Updated: 2025-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

50000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2036-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the Registry study is to observe the improvement in subject-reported clinical outcomes for percutaneous orthopedic procedures for treatment of musculoskeletal disorders.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This Registry was designed to assure that the benefits and knowledge gained by studying clinical outcomes associated with the use of percutaneous orthopedic procedures outweigh the potential risks to the patients. The primary objective of this Registry is to observe the improvements in subject-reported clinical outcomes for these procedures used to treat musculoskeletal disorders. Secondary objectives include evaluating post-treatment complication, adverse events, re-injections, and surgical intervention. Patients receiving percutaneous orthopedic treatments are asked to enroll before receiving treatment and complete a set of baseline questionnaires regarding pain and functionality of the area of the body being treated (i.e. knee, shoulder, spine, etc). Follow-up outcomes are collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and annually 2-20 years post-injection. Subjects are withdrawn from the Registry prematurely if a surgical operation occurs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Orthopedic Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Orthobiologic Procedures

To observe the improvement in subject-reported clinical outcomes for percutaneous orthopedic procedures used to treat musculoskeletal disorders.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Candidates must meet ALL of the following:

1. Voluntary signature of the IRB approved Informed Consents,
2. Treated with a Regenexx procedure
3. Have a musculoskeletal condition appropriate for the procedure such as osteoarthritis or internal joint derangement; ligament or tendon injury; intervertebral disc degeneration; protrusion, extrusion, or annular tear; muscle tear

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Regenexx, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christopher Centeno, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Regenerative Sciences, LLC and Centeno-Schultz Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Catalyst Pain Solutions

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Healthlink Center

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Healthlink Center

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Healthlink Center

San Rafael, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Orthopedic Institute

Thousand Oaks, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Orthopedic Institute-Van Nuys

Van Nuys, California, United States

Site Status

Centeno-Schultz Clinic

Broomfield, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Regenexx

Broomfield, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New reGeneration Orthopedics

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago Arthritis

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic Stem Cell Resource

Des Plaines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Harbor View Medical

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Bodyworks Musculoskeletal Medicine

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Total Care-LA

Lafayette, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Stem Cell ARTS-MD

Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States

Site Status

RejuvMedical

Waite Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

New Jersey Sports Medicine

Cedar Knolls, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic Stem Cell Solutions

Oakhurst, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Rehabilitation Center of New Jersey

Wayne, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Rehabilitation Center of New York

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Beacon Orthopaedics

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

ProMedica

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

RegenOrthoSport

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Columbia Pain Management

Hood River, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Rehabilitation and Pain Specialists

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Center for Sports Medicine

Springfield, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

RegenOrthoSport

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Wasatch Pain Solutions

South Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Vermont Regenerative Medicine

Winooski, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Stem Cell ARTS-VA

McLean, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Nepean Specialist Sports Medicine

Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

RegenOrthoSport

Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Centeno CJ, Schultz JR, Cheever M, Robinson B, Freeman M, Marasco W. Safety and complications reporting on the re-implantation of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells using autologous platelet lysate technique. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010 Mar;5(1):81-93. doi: 10.2174/157488810790442796.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19951252 (View on PubMed)

Centeno CJ, Schultz JR, Cheever M, Freeman M, Faulkner S, Robinson B, Hanson R. Safety and complications reporting update on the re-implantation of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells using autologous platelet lysate technique. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2011 Dec;6(4):368-78. doi: 10.2174/157488811797904371.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22023622 (View on PubMed)

Bain BJ. Morbidity associated with bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy - a review of UK data for 2004. Haematologica. 2006 Sep;91(9):1293-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16956842 (View on PubMed)

Nejadnik H, Hui JH, Feng Choong EP, Tai BC, Lee EH. Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells versus autologous chondrocyte implantation: an observational cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1110-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546509359067. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20392971 (View on PubMed)

Wakitani S, Okabe T, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Saito M, Koyama T, Nawata M, Tensho K, Kato H, Uematsu K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Hattori K, Ohgushi H. Safety of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for cartilage repair in 41 patients with 45 joints followed for up to 11 years and 5 months. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011 Feb;5(2):146-50. doi: 10.1002/term.299.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20603892 (View on PubMed)

Centeno CJ, Berger DR, Money BT, Dodson E, Urbanek CW, Steinmetz NJ. Percutaneous autologous bone marrow concentrate for knee osteoarthritis: patient-reported outcomes and progenitor cell content. Int Orthop. 2022 Oct;46(10):2219-2228. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05524-9. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35932306 (View on PubMed)

Centeno CJ, Money BT, Dodson E, Stemper I, Steinmetz NJ. The rate of venous thromboembolism after knee bone marrow concentrate procedures: should we anticoagulate? Int Orthop. 2022 Oct;46(10):2213-2218. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05500-3. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35844014 (View on PubMed)

Centeno C, Markle J, Dodson E, Stemper I, Williams C, Hyzy M, Ichim T, Freeman M. Symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament tears treated with percutaneous injection of autologous bone marrow concentrate and platelet products: a non-controlled registry study. J Transl Med. 2018 Sep 3;16(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1623-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30176875 (View on PubMed)

Centeno C, Markle J, Dodson E, Stemper I, Williams CJ, Hyzy M, Ichim T, Freeman M. Treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease-associated radicular pain with culture-expanded autologous mesenchymal stem cells: a pilot study on safety and efficacy. J Transl Med. 2017 Sep 22;15(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1300-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28938891 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RSI2015-REG01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CERAMENT G Device Registry
NCT06010433 RECRUITING
Perform Humeral System Study
NCT05067543 RECRUITING
Surgical Joint Registry MBJRF
NCT03484325 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION