The Effect of the Serratus Block on Pain Control After Breast Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02453516

Last Updated: 2020-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-29

Study Completion Date

2019-12-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Surgery for breast cancer is associated with significant pain. The serratus nerve block targets the interfascial plane either below or above the serratus muscle, blocking thereby the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves. The purpose of this randomized controlled double-blinded study is to see whether the addition of a serratus nerve block to a general anesthesia results in a better postoperative pain control in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The prevalence of severe acute postoperative pain after breast surgery is high. Regional anesthesia has the potential to provide superior pain relief with fewer side effects compared to standard systemic opioid therapy. The search for a regional anesthesia technique for breast surgery has been ongoing as this technique needs to be time efficient, relatively risk-free and also practicable in an out-patient setting. The serratus block is a promising technique that may combine these advantages.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Serratus Block Group

Patients will receive a preoperative ultrasound-guided serratus block with 0.4ml/kg (max.30ml) of ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:4000,000 epinephrine injected between the serratus anterior (superficial) and external intercostal (deep) muscles followed by subsequent general anesthesia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Serratus Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound-guided nerve block using ropivacaine 0.5% (0.4ml/kg) injected between the serratus anterior and external intercostal muscles

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug indicated for regional anesthesia

epinephrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Drug indicated to prolong the action of regional anesthesia

Placebo Block - Control Group

Patients will receive a preoperative placebo injection with a subcutaneous injection of 1ml normal sterile saline solution in the midaxillary line and the ultrasound probe will be used to simulate the pressure and block duration associated with the serratus block. These patients will then receive general anesthesia.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Subcutaneous injection of 1ml sterile normal saline solution in the midaxillary line

sterile saline

Intervention Type OTHER

Neutral injection (no drug involved)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Serratus Block

Ultrasound-guided nerve block using ropivacaine 0.5% (0.4ml/kg) injected between the serratus anterior and external intercostal muscles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placebo Block

Subcutaneous injection of 1ml sterile normal saline solution in the midaxillary line

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ropivacaine

Drug indicated for regional anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

epinephrine

Drug indicated to prolong the action of regional anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

sterile saline

Neutral injection (no drug involved)

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Control Group - Placebo Comparator Naropin HCL Adrenaline Chloride Sodium Chloride

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I to III (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System)
* undergoing unilateral primary or secondary breast surgery for cancer, specifically: lumpectomies with sentinel node biopsy or partial mastectomies or simple mastectomies, with or without sentinel node biopsy
* day surgery procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* inability to understand or to provide consent
* inability or unwillingness to comply with required follow-up assessments
* psychiatric disorder affecting patient assessment
* contraindication to regional anesthesia, e.g., coagulopathy
* allergy to local anesthestic
* chronic pain and/or chronic use of opioids with a daily use of over 30mg oxycodone or equivalent per day
* contraindication to a component of multimodal analgesia
* preexisting neuropathy with motor or sensory deficits in the area of the anterolateral chest wall
* infection near the injection site
* pregnancy
* BMI \>35
* complication or adverse events unrelated to the study intervention that precludes evaluation of the primary and secondary outcomes
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Women's College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Brull, MD FRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Women's College Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Women's College Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abdallah FW, Patel V, Madjdpour C, Cil T, Brull R. Quality of recovery scores in deep serratus anterior plane block vs. sham block in ambulatory breast cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2021 Sep;76(9):1190-1197. doi: 10.1111/anae.15373. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33492696 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-0051-E

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.