Is PECS Block Equivalent to Paravertebral Block in Preventing Postoperative Pain After Breast Surgery?

NCT ID: NCT02645474

Last Updated: 2024-08-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Two regional anesthesia techniques already in use in common clinical practice -paravertebral block and pectoral nerve block (PECS block) are compared in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled, non-inferiority trial, in order to compare their success rate in patients udergoing breast surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim of the study is to compare paravertebral block and PECS block success rate in patients undergoing elective breast surgery (mastectomy or quadrantectomy) with a combined anesthesia technique.

Primary outcome is block success rate defined as a VAS score of 30 or less in PACU and at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes are: rescue opioids requirement; incidence of procedure related complications; incidence of postoperative side-effects; patients' quality of life level during the first 24 postoperative hours; patients' satisfaction.

A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial was designed in order to compare paravertebral block and PECS block with regard to block success over the first 24 hours postoperatively in patients undergoing mastectomy or quadrantectomy procedures with a combined anesthesia technique.

Inclusion criteria: adult patients, ASA class 1 to 3, scheduled for elective mastectomy or quadrantectomy. Exclusion criteria: patients refusal, contraindication to regional anaesthesia (coagulopathies, concurrent anticoagulant therapy, allergy to local anaesthetics, infection at puncture site).

After written informed consent, patients will be randomized into two cohorts, the first being treated with a paravertebral block, while the second with a PECS block. Both procedures will be standardized with regard to injection technique, local anaesthetic drug and volume and performed under ultrasound real-time guidance. Both groups will undergo the regional anesthesia technique after induction of general anaesthesia to be blinded with regard to the type of block. This will be standardized as well, according to our centers current clinical practice. Postoperative pain will be than measured on a validated visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100) in the recovery room and periodically after discharge to the ward until 24 hours postoperatively. Rescue opioids requirement will be recorded. Eventual procedural complications occurred will be recorded as well as postoperative side effects. A questionnaire about patients' satisfaction and quality of life during the first 24 postoperative hours will be filled in for every patient. Data collected will be initially inserted in a form and subsequently collected, pooled and anonymously registered in an electronic data base.

A sample size calculation has been preliminary performed with regard to the primary outcome. A 20% difference in the blocks success rate (defined as a postoperative pain on VAS scale of 30 or less) will be considered as clinically significant.

In our practice, paravertebral block is the current gold standard and it is associated on average to a 50% mean value on VAS scale during the first 48 postoperative hours. PECS block will be thus compared to this standard of care. A total of 39 patients per arm will be required (95% confidence interval). Accounting for a 10% drop-out rate, we will include 43 patients per arm.

Pain levels will be measured as medians and interquartile ranges. Statistical analysis will be performed using Student t-test for normally distributed variables while Mann-Whitney test was applied to non-normally distributed variables.

This study will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, the ICH-GCP or ISO EN 14155 (as far as applicable) as well as all national legal and regulatory requirements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Other Acute Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paravertebral block with ropivacaine

Patients are treated with an older technique (paravertebral block with ropivacaine), somehow established in treating pain after breast surgery. This technique has been shown to be effective but has an intrinsic risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax and is considered technically demanding.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paravertebral block with ropivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.5%, total volume 20 ml) is infiltrated in the paravertebral block at T4 level under ultrasound guidance.

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Amidic local anesthetic standardly used for nerve block and infiltration

PECS block with ropivacaine

Patients are treated with PECS block, which has been already adopted in common clinical practice as an alternative to paravertebral block for postoperative pain treatment after breast surgery. This technique is thought to be somehow simpler to perform and safer with regard to pneumothorax, however no studies have been done yet to statistically compare the two blocks with regard to safety and effectiveness.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PECS block with ropivacaine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.5%, total volume 30 ml) is infiltrated in between the fasciae of serratus and minor pectoralis muscles under ultrasound guidance.

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Amidic local anesthetic standardly used for nerve block and infiltration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PECS block with ropivacaine

Local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.5%, total volume 30 ml) is infiltrated in between the fasciae of serratus and minor pectoralis muscles under ultrasound guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Paravertebral block with ropivacaine

Local anesthetic (ropivacaine 0.5%, total volume 20 ml) is infiltrated in the paravertebral block at T4 level under ultrasound guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ropivacaine

Amidic local anesthetic standardly used for nerve block and infiltration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pectoral muscles sheath block PVB Naropine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients
* ASA class 1 to 3 patients
* patients scheduled for elective breast mastectomy or quadrantectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* patients' refusal
* contraindication to regional anaesthesia (coagulopathies, concurrent anticoagulant therapy, allergy to local anaesthetics, infection at puncture site)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrea Saporito

Andrea Saporito MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luciano Anselmi, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli

Bellinzona, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dossi R, Tasciotti E, van Sander K, Maino P, Reyes Lozano V, Saporito A, Koetsier E. Comparison of Pectoral Nerve and Paravertebral Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Breast Surgery: A Multicentre Randomised Double-Blind Trial. J Breast Cancer. 2025 Aug;28(4):268-279. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2025.0060.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40887728 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PECS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Breast Surgery
NCT06779656 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA