Effects of Articaine Computer-controlled and Conventional Delivery for Anterior and Middle Superior Alveolar Nerve Block

NCT ID: NCT02440347

Last Updated: 2015-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare pulpal anesthesia and cardiovascular parameters obtained with 0.6 ml of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) for anterior and middle superior alveolar nerve (AMSA) block performed by standard and computer-controlled delivery in healthy volunteers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traditionally, pulpal anesthesia is obtained by infiltration or mandibular nerve block. However, it is not always possible to achieve complete pulpal anesthesia with previously mentioned anesthetic techniques.

It is well documented that administration of 0,6-0,9 ml of anesthetic solution with palatal approach with anterior middle superior injection (AMSA) provided successful pulpal anesthesia from central incisor to second premolar. In addition, palatal soft tissues from midpalate to free gingiva and from central incisor to first molar are fully anesthetized with AMSA. The injection site is located at a point that bisects the maxillary first and second premolars, and midway between the crest of the free gingival margin and mid-palatine suture. The needle is orientated at a 45-degree angle with the bevel facing the palatal tissue. AMSA presents intraosseous anesthetic technique.

Traditionally, palatal injection administered with conventional syringe was described as very painful. On the other hand, computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLADS) has been recommended for AMSA as a system which allows slow administration of anesthetic solution, with constant pressure. It was shown that AMSA do not provide undesired buccal and upper lip anesthesia.

The AMSA technique has been recommended for proce¬dures ranging from operative restorations, crown preparation to scaling and root planning.

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare parameters of pulpal anesthesia and cardiovascular function after AMSA injection of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000), delivered by conventional syringe or CCLADS. Study sample will comprise 30 healthy (ASA1) volunteers who will receive 0.6 ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) by conventional syringe, and after two-week washout period the same amount of local anesthetic by CCLADS. Parameters of pulpal and soft tissue anesthesia (onset and duration) for all maxillary teeth on the anesthetized side, as well as parameters of cardiovascular function (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate) will be monitored and compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Local Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Computer controlled anesthetic delivery by Anaeject

Patients received single dose of 0.6 ml of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) by computer controlled anesthetic delivery system (C-CLADS) for AMSA nerve block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer controlled anesthetic delivery by Anaeject

Intervention Type DEVICE

Single dose of 0.6ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) delivered by computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system (Anaeject).

Conventional anesthetic delivery by carpule syringe

Patients received single dose of 0.6 ml of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) by conventional anesthetic delivery for AMSA nerve block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional anesthetic delivery by carpule syringe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Single dose of 0.6ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) delivered by conventional syringe (carpule syringe).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer controlled anesthetic delivery by Anaeject

Single dose of 0.6ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) delivered by computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system (Anaeject).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional anesthetic delivery by carpule syringe

Single dose of 0.6ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) delivered by conventional syringe (carpule syringe).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I
* full maxillary dental arch
* vital maxillary teeth without caries, restorations, periodontal disease or history of trauma

Exclusion Criteria

* allergies to local anesthetic solution ingredients, food and drugs
* alcohol and drugs abuse
* heavy tobacco smoking
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Belgrade

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bozidar Brkovic, DDS, MSc, PhD, Professor

DDS PhD Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bozidar M Brkovic, DDS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Dejan Cetkovic, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Vladimir M Biocanin, DDS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Pharmacy and Health, University of Travnik, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Marija S Milic, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Ivana Brajic, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Serbia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

175021

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

36/5-2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.