Effects of Articaine Computer-controlled and Conventional Delivery for Anterior and Middle Superior Alveolar Nerve Block
NCT ID: NCT02440347
Last Updated: 2015-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-30
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Lower Molars With Irreversible Pulpits
NCT01912755
Risk of Nerve Damage After Administration of Local Anesthesia
NCT06564987
Comparative Effect of Palatal Injection in Pediatric Patient
NCT06025825
Comparison of Articaine Mandibular Infiltration to Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Pediatric Patients
NCT04865848
Efficacy of Dexamethasone or Adrenaline in Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
NCT04850885
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is well documented that administration of 0,6-0,9 ml of anesthetic solution with palatal approach with anterior middle superior injection (AMSA) provided successful pulpal anesthesia from central incisor to second premolar. In addition, palatal soft tissues from midpalate to free gingiva and from central incisor to first molar are fully anesthetized with AMSA. The injection site is located at a point that bisects the maxillary first and second premolars, and midway between the crest of the free gingival margin and mid-palatine suture. The needle is orientated at a 45-degree angle with the bevel facing the palatal tissue. AMSA presents intraosseous anesthetic technique.
Traditionally, palatal injection administered with conventional syringe was described as very painful. On the other hand, computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLADS) has been recommended for AMSA as a system which allows slow administration of anesthetic solution, with constant pressure. It was shown that AMSA do not provide undesired buccal and upper lip anesthesia.
The AMSA technique has been recommended for proce¬dures ranging from operative restorations, crown preparation to scaling and root planning.
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare parameters of pulpal anesthesia and cardiovascular function after AMSA injection of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000), delivered by conventional syringe or CCLADS. Study sample will comprise 30 healthy (ASA1) volunteers who will receive 0.6 ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) by conventional syringe, and after two-week washout period the same amount of local anesthetic by CCLADS. Parameters of pulpal and soft tissue anesthesia (onset and duration) for all maxillary teeth on the anesthetized side, as well as parameters of cardiovascular function (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate) will be monitored and compared.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Computer controlled anesthetic delivery by Anaeject
Patients received single dose of 0.6 ml of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) by computer controlled anesthetic delivery system (C-CLADS) for AMSA nerve block
Computer controlled anesthetic delivery by Anaeject
Single dose of 0.6ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) delivered by computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system (Anaeject).
Conventional anesthetic delivery by carpule syringe
Patients received single dose of 0.6 ml of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) by conventional anesthetic delivery for AMSA nerve block
Conventional anesthetic delivery by carpule syringe
Single dose of 0.6ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) delivered by conventional syringe (carpule syringe).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Computer controlled anesthetic delivery by Anaeject
Single dose of 0.6ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) delivered by computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system (Anaeject).
Conventional anesthetic delivery by carpule syringe
Single dose of 0.6ml 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100.000) delivered by conventional syringe (carpule syringe).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* full maxillary dental arch
* vital maxillary teeth without caries, restorations, periodontal disease or history of trauma
Exclusion Criteria
* alcohol and drugs abuse
* heavy tobacco smoking
18 Years
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Belgrade
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bozidar Brkovic, DDS, MSc, PhD, Professor
DDS PhD Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bozidar M Brkovic, DDS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
Dejan Cetkovic, DDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
Vladimir M Biocanin, DDS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Pharmacy and Health, University of Travnik, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Marija S Milic, DDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
Ivana Brajic, DDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade
Belgrade, , Serbia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
175021
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
36/5-2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.