Play and Pre-Literacy Among Young Children

NCT ID: NCT02432443

Last Updated: 2017-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Children begin to develop fundamental motor skills (FMS), such as running and kicking, and pre-literacy skills, such as rhyming, during early childhood. These skills are very important as they lay the foundation for more complex movements and literacy skill development later in life, support overall healthy development in several areas, and help contribute to the child's readiness for school. A child with strong motor skills is well equipped to lead a life with healthy levels of physical activity, positive social interactions, positive self-perceptions, and greater cognitive and language abilities. These skills will not develop optimally on their own so it is essential to teach, challenge, and reinforce them at an early age; often this learning takes place at home prior to entering school. Most research on this topic has primarily focused on school-aged children or children with specific developmental challenges and less is known about teaching motor and pre-literacy skills to young children and giving parents the tools to practice these skills at home with their children. The aim of the present study is to examine the effect of a motor and pre-literacy program, which emphasizes parental involvement, on motor, pre-literacy, social skills, cognitive abilities, and self-competence in 3 to 4 year old children with typical development.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary purpose of the intervention is to support the overall healthy development of children. Children will be recruited from families attending community agencies (e.g. Ontario Early Years Centres) in Hamilton. Interested parents will receive information flyers with the study team's contact information and instructions to contact the study team if they are interested in participating in the study. Interested parents will be screened for eligibility of their child. Information packages will be emailed or mailed to eligible families and will be followed-up with over the telephone in one week to obtain informed verbal consent. Baseline appointments will be booked for all eligible children. Informed written consent will be obtained at the baseline appointment before testing begins. Children will be randomized 1:1 to either the experimental or wait-list control group. Randomization will be completed using a computer algorithm. All children will be assessed pre- and post-program as well as at follow-up, 5 weeks after the completion of the program. Children in the wait-list control group will be assessed one additional time at baseline. The program will run for one hour per week for 10 consecutive weeks. Parents will be asked to complete a checklist each week indicating the number of times they practiced the activities at home. A sample size of 36 children is considered sufficient to provide 80% power to detect a medium effect size, with an alpha of 0.05. Eighteen children will be randomized to the experimental group and 18 children will be randomized to the wait-list control group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Child Development

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Motor and pre-literacy program

First group to receive the motor and pre-literacy program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Motor and pre-literacy program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The program will run for 60 minutes once per week for 10 consecutive weeks and will consist of three components: direct FMS instruction, unstructured exploratory free-play, and an interactive storybook reading activity. The curriculum and teaching strategies to be used for the first two segments of our intervention have been successfully implemented in previous research to improve the motor skills of 4 year old children with autism (Bremer, Balogh, \& Lloyd, 2014). Specific strategies and books were selected from an existing evidence-based curriculum (Justice \& McGuinty, 2009). There will be active involvement of at least one parent in the direct instruction and reading components.

Wait-list comparison

Second group to receive the motor and pre-literacy program after the experimental arm has completed the program.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Wait-list Comparison

Intervention Type OTHER

The participants will not participate in the motor and pre-literacy program for 10 weeks after enrollment and will continue with their normal daily life without any intervention. After the experimental arm completes the motor and pre-literacy program, the wait-list group will receive the exact same motor and pre-literacy intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Motor and pre-literacy program

The program will run for 60 minutes once per week for 10 consecutive weeks and will consist of three components: direct FMS instruction, unstructured exploratory free-play, and an interactive storybook reading activity. The curriculum and teaching strategies to be used for the first two segments of our intervention have been successfully implemented in previous research to improve the motor skills of 4 year old children with autism (Bremer, Balogh, \& Lloyd, 2014). Specific strategies and books were selected from an existing evidence-based curriculum (Justice \& McGuinty, 2009). There will be active involvement of at least one parent in the direct instruction and reading components.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Wait-list Comparison

The participants will not participate in the motor and pre-literacy program for 10 weeks after enrollment and will continue with their normal daily life without any intervention. After the experimental arm completes the motor and pre-literacy program, the wait-list group will receive the exact same motor and pre-literacy intervention.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* typical development

Exclusion Criteria

* diagnosed with any developmental delay (e.g., autism, Developmental Coordination Disorder, etc.) or health conditions that may prohibit safe participation in the program (e.g., unstable heart condition).
Minimum Eligible Age

36 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Cairney

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Cairney, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Boys and Girls Club of Hamilton

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

McMaster Innovation Park

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boethel M. Readiness: School, Family, & Community Connections. Annual Synthesis, 2004. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2015 Feb2]. Available from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED484507.pdf

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Bremer E, Balogh R, Lloyd M. Effectiveness of a fundamental motor skill intervention for 4-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Autism. 2015 Nov;19(8):980-91. doi: 10.1177/1362361314557548. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25432505 (View on PubMed)

Clark JE From the beginning: a developmental perspective on movement and mobility. Quest [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2014 Dec 1]; 57(1):37-45. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00336297.2005.10491841 DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2005.10491841

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Diamond A. Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):44-56. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00117.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10836557 (View on PubMed)

Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales--2nd Edition. 1974

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gioia G, Espy KA, Isquith PK. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gresham FM, Elliott SN. Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments; 2008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Harter S, Pike R. The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Child Dev. 1984 Dec;55(6):1969-82.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6525886 (View on PubMed)

Invernizzi MA, Sullivan A, Meier JD, Swank L. Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening: Preschool Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia; 2004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Isenberg JP, Quisenberry N. A position paper of the Association for Childhood Education International PLAY: Essential for all Children. Childhood Education [Internet] 2002 [cited 2015 Feb 22];79(1):33-39. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00094056.2002.10522763

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Iverson JM. Developing language in a developing body: the relationship between motor development and language development. J Child Lang. 2010 Mar;37(2):229-61. doi: 10.1017/S0305000909990432. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20096145 (View on PubMed)

Justice LM, Ezell HK. Word and print awareness in 4-year old children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy [Internet] 2001 October [cited 2015 Apr 2];17(3): 207-225. Available from: http://clt.sagepub.com/content/17/3/207.full.pdf+html

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Justice LM, McGuinty AS. Read It Again-PreK!A Preschool Curriculum Supplement to Promote Language and Literacy Foundations. [Internet] 2009 [cited 2014 Oct 20]. Available from: http://arts-sciences.und.edu/communication-sciences-disorders/_files/docs/readitagain-prekmanual.pdf

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Logan SW, Robinson LE, Wilson AE, Lucas WA. Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2012 May;38(3):305-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21880055 (View on PubMed)

National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development; Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, editors. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225557/

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25077268 (View on PubMed)

Bedard C, Bremer E, Campbell W, Cairney J. Evaluation of a Direct-Instruction Intervention to Improve Movement and Preliteracy Skills among Young Children: A Within-Subject Repeated-Measures Design. Front Pediatr. 2018 Jan 17;5:298. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00298. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29387681 (View on PubMed)

Bedard C, Bremer E, Campbell W, Cairney J. A Quasi-Experimental Study of a Movement and Preliteracy Program for 3- and 4-Year-Old Children. Front Pediatr. 2017 May 1;5:94. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00094. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28507981 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INCH-0415

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Promoting Playfulness
NCT06625255 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1