Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings

NCT ID: NCT03743337

Last Updated: 2019-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

310 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-01

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Mathematica Policy Research, funded by the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will collect descriptive information for the Study of Coaching Practices in Early Care and Education Settings (SCOPE) project. The goal of this information collection is to learn how the prevalence, implementation, combination, and tailoring of core features of professional development coaching for early care and education (ECE) providers vary across ECE classrooms and family child care (FCC) homes serving children supported by Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) subsidies or in settings that receive Head Start grants. The investigators will conduct three data collection activities. First, the investigators will collect information on coaching taking place in different states in winter 2018 from state-level entities. Second, the investigators will conduct one round of survey data collection with ECE center directors, coaches, teachers, and FCC providers in winter 2019 through spring 2019. Third, the investigators will conduct case studies to better understand factors that influence the coaching approaches identified through the survey data collection. The case studies will include semi-structured interviews, a coaching session observation, and collection of coaching logs. The case studies will occur in spring 2020.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to advance understanding of implementation of core features of coaching in ECE classrooms, and how features may vary by key contextual factors and implementation drivers. This study will focus on coaching used for delivering professional development services to ECE teachers and FCC providers to improve knowledge and practice in center-based classrooms and FCC homes serving preschool-age children. At the classroom/teacher level, the approach to coaching can vary by dosage, content, activities (e.g., assessment, observation, goal-setting, modeling, reflection), materials (e.g., video, written plans, resource documents) and other features. However, there is no consensus as to which of these features are core to the practice of coaching. Additionally, little is known about how these features of coaching are implemented, combined, and tailored to the needs of teachers or how contextual factors or implementation drivers may mediate or moderate the effects of coaching. Ultimately, SCOPE findings will improve coaching practice in the ECE field and determine which coaching features are ripe for more rigorous evaluation.

Descriptive Study: The investigators will carry out a descriptive study in a sample of seven states. Sampled states will have one or more classroom-based coaching models offered to centers and FCC homes that are serving preschool-age children and that receive Head Start grants or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies. All of the data that will be collected are listed below.

1. State coaching informant interviews: To obtain information about coaching approaches and about the available administrative data on coaching, including the range of coaching providers and approaches occurring in states and what ECE settings may be receiving classroom coaching. As part of this process, we will also seek existing administrative data on coaching processes and participants.
2. ECE setting eligibility screening: To obtain information on the characteristics of the ECE setting, the coaching taking place in that setting, and characteristics of participants in coaching; and to determine if a setting is eligible for survey data collection and if personnel are willing to participate in the study
3. Surveys for the descriptive study:

* A center director survey - To collect information on the center context, supports for and challenges to coaching and professional development, and structural and process features of coaching
* A coach survey - To collect information on coach characteristics, supports for and challenges to coaching, and process and structural features of coaching
* A teacher/FCC provider survey- To collect information on teacher and FCC provider characteristics, supports for coaching, structural and process features of coaching, coaching outputs (such as attitudes and beliefs), and the FCC context

Case Studies: The investigators will also conduct case studies in twelve ECE settings (centers and FCC homes) selected from the seven states; some of the settings may have participated in the descriptive study and others may not have. Site visit data collection for the case studies will consist of the following activities:

1. Semi-structured interviews with center directors, teachers/FCC providers, coaches, and coach supervisors. To collect information on how decisions are made about coaching and what features are included; supports for coaching; organizational context and climate for coaching (e.g., organizational culture, philosophies, staffing and turnover, languages and cultures of families served); individual experiences as part of the coaching process; barriers/supports for coaching
2. Teacher/FCC provider survey: The teachers and FCC providers in the case studies will be asked to complete the descriptive study teacher/FCC provider survey.
3. Collection of coaching logs (whenever available): To provide information on the frequency of interactions between teachers/FCC providers and coaches, the focus of these interactions, and the coaching strategies employed. The coaching logs are preexisting materials used by some coaches when they provide coaching to teachers.
4. Coaching session observations: To provide information on the process features of coaching (coaching activities and relationship-building activities); structural features (target of coaching and content); and outputs (teacher/FCC provider engagement, actual dosage, and perceptions of the coach-teacher/FCC provider relationship)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Early Childhood Professional Development

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Currently operating licensed or license exempt child care setting
2. Receiving funding from a Head Start grant and/or serve children who receive CCDF subsidies
3. Currently receiving classroom-based coaching for teachers of preschoolers/FCC providers caring for preschoolers.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Department of Health and Human Services

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Child Trends

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emily Moiduddin, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Mathematica Policy Research

Sally Atkins-Burnett, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mathematica Policy Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mathematica

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Emily Moiduddin, PhD

Role: CONTACT

(202) 484-4223

Tim Bruursema, BS

Role: CONTACT

(202) 484-3097

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tim Bruursema

Role: primary

202-484-3097

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

50320

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Autism Caregiver Coaching in Africa
NCT05551728 RECRUITING NA