Comparison Between NEOSORB Plus and NEOSORB

NCT ID: NCT02431039

Last Updated: 2015-08-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is to investigate whether NEOSORB Plus antibacterial suture (chlorhexidine diacetate coated PGLA910) is not inferior to NEOSORB suture (PGLA910) in the points of intraoperative handling.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Enrollment

1. Urologic surgery which needs fascia and subcutaneous tissue repairs
2. Clean and clean-contaminated surgery
3. Patients aged more than 18 years and under 80 years
2. Randomization

1. NEOSORB Plus (chlorhexidine diacetate coated PGLA910) or NEOSORB (PGLA910) suture
2. Stratification by operative methods: Open surgery vs. laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
3. Follow-up with 30 days

1. Primary endpoint: intraoperative handling during operation
2. Secondary endpoint: wound healing assessment on postoperative 1st (+1) days and 11th (± 4) days
3. Safety evaluation: counting adverse events within postoperative 30 days

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Skin Reaction to Suture Material

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NEOSORB PLUS

Subjects who are treated by NEOSORB PLUS

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NEOSORB PLUS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fascia and subcutaneous tissue repaired by antibacterial suture materials (Chlorhexidine diacetate coated PGLA910)

NEOSORB

Subjects who are treated by NEOSORB

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

NEOSORB

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fascia and subcutaneous tissue repaired by non-antibacterial suture materials (PGLA910)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NEOSORB PLUS

Fascia and subcutaneous tissue repaired by antibacterial suture materials (Chlorhexidine diacetate coated PGLA910)

Intervention Type DEVICE

NEOSORB

Fascia and subcutaneous tissue repaired by non-antibacterial suture materials (PGLA910)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Antibacterial suture material Non-antibacterial suture material

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Urologic surgery which needs fascia and subcutaneous tissue repairs
* Clean and clean-contaminated surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Contaminated surgery
* Wound requiring retention suture
* Suspicious malnutrition status
* Active infection status or AIDS
* Incision sites prone to expand, stretch, distend, or require support
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine diacetate
* Significant active medical illness which in the opinion of the investigator would preclude protocol treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul, Korea

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Korea Health Industry Development Institute

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Samyang Biopharmaceuticals Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chang Wook Jeong

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chang Wook Jeong, M.D.,Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tae BS, Park JH, Kim JK, Ku JH, Kwak C, Kim HH, Jeong CW. Comparison of intraoperative handling and wound healing between (NEOSORB(R) plus) and coated polyglactin 910 suture (NEOSORB(R)): a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0377-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29980202 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D-1503-016-653

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
NCT07078669 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA