Comparison of Three Types of Sutures in Oral Surgery. Study of Bacterial Colonization, Tissue Reaction and Clinical Characteristics: Randomized Clinical Study

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Considering the wide variety of surgical sutures currently marketed in the field of Dentistry, it was decided to conduct a study comparing the microbial adhesion and antibacterial activity of three different types of sutures used in Oral Surgery (Silk, non-absorbable polyamide monofilament and non-absorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene).

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

The Comparison of Microbial Adherence to Various Sutures in Patients Undergoing Oral Surgery

NCT02653924

Oral Surgical Procedures

UNKNOWN NA

Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery

NCT06020157

Wound Heal

COMPLETED NA

Triclosan Coated Suture Wound Closure for Peripheral Vascular Surgery: a Prospective Multicenter Study

NCT01101789

Surgical Wound Infection

COMPLETED NA

Effect of Barbed Suture and Triclosan-coated Monofilament in Emergency Surgery

NCT03763279

Surgical Site Infection

COMPLETED PHASE3

Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery

NCT07078669

Wound Closure Suture Materials

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The general or primary objective is:

• To compare 3 non-absorbable suture materials used in oral surgery: silk, polyamide monofilament and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.

The specific or secondary objectives are:

* To evaluate how each type of suture influences wound healing and the patient's postoperative period.
* To study bacterial colonization in each type of suture.
* To determine the tissue reaction and clinical characteristics of each suture.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wound Healing Complication Oral Surgery Third Molar Extraction Oral Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Suture 1: Silk.

Silk suture.

Group Type OTHER

To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

To compare bacterial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical characteristics such as wound healing and patient postoperative outcomes in 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery.

Suture 2: Non-absorbable polyamide monofilament.

Non-absorbable polyamide monofilament.

Group Type OTHER

To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

To compare bacterial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical characteristics such as wound healing and patient postoperative outcomes in 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery.

Suture 3: Non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.

Non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.

Group Type OTHER

To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

To compare bacterial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical characteristics such as wound healing and patient postoperative outcomes in 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery

To compare bacterial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical characteristics such as wound healing and patient postoperative outcomes in 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

2028/CEIH/2021

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with indication for extraction of a third lower molar retained in an unfavorable position that requires a bayonet incision in the surgical procedure.
* Age: patients aged 18 years or older.
* ASA I patients (Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology, 1979): healthy patients who tolerate stress well, without systemic pathology, no anxiety and in whom a therapeutic modification is not necessary.