Modified Vertical Internal Mattress Suture Versus Simple Loop Interrupted Suture.
NCT ID: NCT03556163
Last Updated: 2018-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-01
2018-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery
NCT06020157
The Comparison of Interrupted Modified Smead-Jones Versus Conventional Continuous Suturing Technique for Closure of Rectus Sheath in Patients Undergoing Laparotomy for Hollow Viscus Perforation.
NCT06697067
Unidirectional Barbed Sutures in Mucogingival Procedures
NCT04937114
A Comparison of Polyglactin 910 and Chromic Gut Suture in the Closure of Punch Biopsy Sites
NCT01722994
Dermotaxis v/s Loop Suture Technique for Closure of Fasciotomy Wounds : a Study of 50 Cases
NCT02956733
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The requirement of access for scaling and root planning, pocket depth reduction, correction of gross gingival aberrations ,and establishment of morphology of the dento-gingival area conducive to infection control led to the development of the various surgical procedures. The initial surgical procedures used in periodontal therapy involved excision of the diseased gingival tissue . The main disadvantages of these procedures are unwanted root exposure, poor aesthetics, decrease in width of attached gingiva, excision of frenum attachment and creation of shallow vestibular depth.
Proper management of supracrestal soft tissue flap during suturing appears to be of critical importance in ultimate outcome of surgical periodontal pocket management .A number of studies advocate the proper management of supra-alveolar component of flap in management of infrabony defects employing regenerative techniques with grafts / barrier membrane to minimize postoperative exposure, contamination and/or exfoliation of the grafted material and / or barrier membrane. However review of the available literature does not reveal studies conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of close approximation of flaps by different suturing techniques. Sites with suprabony periodontal pocket depth of 4mm have approximately 6 mm height of unsupported supracrestal soft tissue flap which increases with further increase in pocket depth. Moreover, with advancing probing depth, base of the unsupported soft tissue wall of periodontal pocket comes closer to the musculature in the vestibule, thereby eliciting requirement of a more efficient suturing technique to resist muscle pull for prevention of any disturbance to healing granulation tissue.
The interrupted suturing encompasses two suturing technique; the simple loop and figure of eight. Modified vertical internal mattress suture is a variation of the vertical mattress suture which is especially useful in maximizing wound eversion, reducing dead space, and minimizing tension across the wound. Wound eversion maximize flap approximation. The recommended time for removal of this suture is 5-7 days to reduce the risk of scarring (cross hatching).
Thus the most suitable suturing technique to achieve healing by primary intention and connective tissue reattachment/ periodontal regeneration need to be explored. The present study is intended to determine the influence of the simple interrupted and modified vertical internal mattress suturing technique on the outcome of modified Widman flap surgery .
STUDY DESIGN This randomized clinical interventional study was conducted in Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences (PGIDS), Rohtak.
STUDY POPULATION Out of 172 patients screened from regular OPD in Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, the study was conducted in 48 chronic periodontitis participants meeting the eligibility criteria for surgical intervention. 45 patients completed the treatment protocol (28 males and 17 females, mean age: 35.91±7.67 years). Study period was from 01-12-2016 to 31-03-2018.
METHODOLOGY
Periodontal examination
All eligible participants after 8 weeks of phase 1 therapy, were examined in a standardized way using illumination by a standard dental light, a mouth mirror, tweezer, manual calibrated probe (PCP-UNC 15 Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) and explorer. Following parameters were recorded at baseline (day of surgery), after 3 months and 6 months follow up.
* Plaque index (Silness and Loe) (PI)
* Gingival index (Loe and Silness) (GI)
* Bleeding on probing (BOP)
* Probing pocket depth (PPD)
* Clinical attachment level (CAL)
* Location of crest of free gingival margin in respect to CEJ.(REC) All clinical parameters were recorded at six sites (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, disto-lingual, mid-lingual and mesio-lingual) per tooth in all teeth except for third molars. BOP was assessed as a dichotomous measure (bleeding present or absent) within 15 seconds of probing. PD was recorded from gingival margin to base of pocket and CAL from cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to base of pocket.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME VARIABLES Improvement in PPD and CAL over 6 months was considered as the primary outcome variable of the study. Secondary variables included improvement in PI, GI, BOP and REC.
PHASE 1 THERAPY Phase 1 therapy included patient education, motivation and plaque control. Full mouth supragingival and subgingival scaling and root planning with ultrasonic scaler (EMS Piezon 250 ,Switzerland), hand scaler and curettes (Hu-Friedy) was completed . Patients were kept on maintenance therapy.
All clinical parameters were recorded in 48 eligible patients after 8 weeks of SRP. A custom made acrylic stent was fabricated to standardized the location and angulations of periodontal probe. The study procedure was explained to the patient in their own language. Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from each patient. Patients were randomly allocated to test group and control group by envelop method. 48 labelled papers, 24 papers with label 1 and 24 papers with label 2 were placed into an envelope. If the patient picked paper with label 1 he or she was assigned to control group, while picking paper with label 2 meant assignment into test group.
PERIODONTAL SURGICAL PROCEDURE Modified Widman flap surgery was performed in both groups. After administration of local anaesthesia, first incision which is an internal bevel incision, was made 0.5 mm away from the crest of gingival margin to crest of alveolar bone, 2nd intra-crevicular incision from base of periodontal pocket to crest of alveolar bone and 3rd incision /horizontal incision follow the contour of the alveolar crest and the inter-proximal septum to cut loose the collar of gingival tissues which has been separated from the buccal or lingual flap and the teeth. A mucoperiosteal flap was reflected including at least one tooth ahead and one tooth behind the tooth/teeth involved. Meticulous debridement and root planning was carried out using area specific curettes and scalers to remove all the granulation tissue. After instrumentation, the root surface were washed with saline solution in attempt to remove any remaining detached fragments from the surgical field. After debridement mucoperiosteal flaps were repositioned and secured by using 3-0 non absorbable black silk surgical suture. Test group was given modified vertical internal mattress suture. The needle was passed through the buccal flap from the external surface, across the interdental area and through the lingual flap from the internal surface. The suture was run back to the buccal side by passing the needle through the lingual and buccal flaps .Thereafter, the suture is brought through the approximal site coronally to the tissue, passed through the loop of the suture on the lingual aspect, and then brought back to the starting point on the buccal side and tied. The control group was given simple loop interrupted interdental suture. The needle is passed through the buccal flap from the external surface, across the interdental area and the lingual flap from the internal surface or vice versa and tied. Post operative instructions were given.
Follow up was done after 3 and 6 months post-operatively.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS :
All statistical analysis were carried out using statistical software (SPSS,Version 25.0 for Windows,SPSS,Chicago,IL).The normality of distribution of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Data for PI, GI, BOP, PPD, CAL and REC followed non-normal distribution. Non-parametric tests were applied for PI, GI, PPD, CAL and REC. Wilcoxon-Signed Ranks test was applied for intragroup comparison and Mann Whitney test for intergroup comparison. Statistical analysis of BOP was done by McNemar test in intragroup and Chi-square test for intergroup comparison. Correlation and association between predictors and dependent variables was analysed by using Mixed Model analysis. Statistical significance level was set at P=0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Test Group
Modified vertical internal mattress sutures + MWF surgery.
Modified vertical internal mattress sutures + MWF surgery.
Modified vertical internal mattress sutures were given after modified Widman flap surgery.
Control Group
Simple loop interrupted sutures + MWF surgery.
Simple loop interrupted sutures + MWF surgery.
Simple loop interrupted sutures were given after modified Widman flap surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Modified vertical internal mattress sutures + MWF surgery.
Modified vertical internal mattress sutures were given after modified Widman flap surgery.
Simple loop interrupted sutures + MWF surgery.
Simple loop interrupted sutures were given after modified Widman flap surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Chronic periodontitis criteria as defined by division of Oral health at the centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in collaboration with American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) 42 (Page and Eke 2012) i.e.at least two or more interproximal sites with clinical attachment loss(CAL)≥4 mm (not on the same tooth),or ≥2 interproximal sites with probing pocket depth (PD)≥5 mm (not on the same
* Residual pocket depth ≥4 mm after phase 1 therapy for surgical intervention.
Exclusion Criteria
* Current or former smokers or use of tobacco in any form.
* Patient on anti-inflammatory drugs or antibiotics or history of treatment with medication known to influence periodontal status or healing such as statins, glucocorticoids, phenytoin, calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressants, bisphosphonates or any other host modulatory drug within six months of commencement of study.
* Pregnant women, lactating mothers and women taking oral contraceptives.
* Patient who had undergone periodontal treatment within 6 months prior to the study.
* Patient with average plaque index ≥1.5 after phase 1 therapy.
* Miller Grade II /III tooth mobility after phase 1 treatment.
* Periapical infection in any tooth of the surgical treatment segment.
30 Years
52 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Krishan Kumar, BDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCE,ROHTAK,HARYANA,INDIA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences
Rohtak, Haryana, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Krishan perio
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.