Impact of Suture Type on Pigment Disturbances in Patients of Skin of Color

NCT ID: NCT05408117

Last Updated: 2025-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study assesses if dissolvable (fast gut) or non-dissolvable (polypropylene) epidermal sutures produce better cosmetic results in terms of dyspigmentation and scarring in patients of skin of color. Through a split-wound study design, patients undergoing standard elliptical excisions at least 3 cm in length will receive each suture type. Measurements of dyspigmentation and scarring will be made at 7 days (for the head and neck), 10 days (for the trunk and extremities), and 3 months for all locations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects who consent to the study will have the following information recorded on the date of surgery: age, sex, indication for surgery, surgical site, scar length, size and type of buried intradermal suture, experience of surgeon (attending, fellow or resident), and New Immigration Scale (NIS) skin color. Basic patient medical data pertinent to wound healing/scar formation will be extracted from the medical record including history of hypertrophic scar/keloids, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and immunosuppression.

The subjects will undergo elliptical excision per standard of care. A single polyglactin 910 suture buried intradermal suture will be placed at the center of the wound. If additional buried intradermal sutures are needed, they will be placed equidistant from the center of the wound such that each side has an equivalent number of intradermal sutures. 5-0 polyglactin 910 will be used for wounds on the head and neck and 3-0 or 4-0 polyglactin 910 will be used for wounds on the trunk and extremities.

Following placement of the intradermal sutures, the subject's wound will be demarcated into halves, labeled either "A" or "B." "A" refers to the left or the superior side, and "B" refers to the right or inferior side. Prior to the study commencement, "A=fast gut" will be written on 17 index cards and "B=fast gut" will be written on 17 index cards. The index cards will be sealed in individual envelopes, shuffled to randomize, and stored securely with the study materials. At the time of surgery, the surgeon will randomly select an envelope which indicates which side will receive which suture type (either 5-0 fast absorbing gut or 5-0 polypropylene). This size of epidermal sutures will be used regardless of site of wound. The intervention will be applied sequentially with side A always being closed first. A simple running suture will be used on each half. The surgeon will aim to keep suture technique including spacing and distance from wound edge identical.

Following the procedure, a standard dressing will be applied and wound care will be discussed. Patients will be seen, as is routinely performed clinically, for suture removal for the polypropylene side in 7 days if the closure was on the head and neck and 10 days if the closure was on the trunk or extremities. Any residual component of fast gut suture that has not yet dissolved will be removed by the medical assistant or nurse so that the physician observer is blinded to which sutures were placed on which side. The following information will be collected at this suture removal visit:

* Photo of the scar
* Patients will perform the patient portion of the POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale), a validated scale of scar cosmesis.
* A co-investigator not present at the time of the surgical procedure will perform the physician portion of the POSAS
* Scar width will be measured 1 cm from midline on each side of the wound. Measurements will be recorded in 0.5 mm increments.
* Pain incurred with suture removal will be measured via a 10 point Visual Analog Scale immediately after sutures are removed, with 1 representing no pain and 10, the worst pain imaginable.

Patients will be asked to return for an in person clinic visit 3 months after surgery for subsequent scar assessment. All surgical patients, not just those involved in the research study, have follow up appointments for suture removal at 7-14 days and at 3-6 months, as per physician discretion. This time interval is the standard of care. The following information will be collected at 3 month follow up:

* Photo of the scar
* Patient and observer POSAS scores (again, a co-investigator not present at the time of the surgical procedure will perform the physician portion of the POSAS).
* Dermatoscopic images of each side of the scar and of an area of normal skin. The dermatoscopic images will be used to calculate a skin hyperpigmentation index (SHI) score, a validated objective measure of skin hyperpigmentation (https://shi.skinimageanalysis.com).
* Scar width will be measured 1 cm from midline on each side of the wound. Measurements will be recorded in 0.5 mm increments.
* Clinical evidence of surgical site infection, wound disruption, and/or any other postsurgical complications.

Patients who fail to attend the in-person 3 month follow up visit will be contacted by telephone to complete the patient portion of the POSAS and asked to upload photos of the scar to their medical record via MyUPMC. Storage of images of the scars will occur for all patients, not just those participating in the study.

Upon completion of study visits, POSAS, SHI and other clinical data will be analyzed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Scar

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

prospective, randomized split-wound study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
Sutures will be removed in their entirety before scar assessment by a co-investigator such that the outcomes assessor is blinded to which suture was used on which side of the scar.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A= left/superior half of wound

Patients with skin of color undergoing dermatologic surgery with planned standard elliptical excision with wound length of 3 cm or greater

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

5-0 Polypropylene epidermal suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Split-wound, intra-individual comparison - half of wound will receive 5-0 polypropylene epidermal suture and half of wound will receive 5-0 fast gut epidermal suture

5-0 Fast gut epidermal suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Split-wound, intra-individual comparison - half of wound will receive 5-0 polypropylene epidermal suture and half of wound will receive 5-0 fast gut epidermal suture

B= right/inferior half of wound

Patients with skin of color undergoing dermatologic surgery with planned standard elliptical excision with wound length of 3 cm or greater

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

5-0 Polypropylene epidermal suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Split-wound, intra-individual comparison - half of wound will receive 5-0 polypropylene epidermal suture and half of wound will receive 5-0 fast gut epidermal suture

5-0 Fast gut epidermal suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Split-wound, intra-individual comparison - half of wound will receive 5-0 polypropylene epidermal suture and half of wound will receive 5-0 fast gut epidermal suture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

5-0 Polypropylene epidermal suture

Split-wound, intra-individual comparison - half of wound will receive 5-0 polypropylene epidermal suture and half of wound will receive 5-0 fast gut epidermal suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

5-0 Fast gut epidermal suture

Split-wound, intra-individual comparison - half of wound will receive 5-0 polypropylene epidermal suture and half of wound will receive 5-0 fast gut epidermal suture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 years or older
2. Undergoing dermatologic surgery with planned standard elliptical excision with wound length of 3 cm or greater. Benign and malignant lesions will be included, including those that have undergone Mohs micrographic surgery prior to standard linear closure. All body sites will be included.
3. Able to give informed consent
4. Able to return for 3 month follow up
5. New Immigration Scale (NIS) skin color 4 or greater - The NIS is an 11 point scale, ranging from zero to 10, with zero representing albinism and 10 representing the darkest possible skin.

Exclusion Criteria

1. High-tension closures not amenable to 5-0 simple running epidermal sutures
2. Known allergy to suture material
3. Pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Melissa Pugliano-Mauro

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Melissa Pugliano-Mauro

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Melissa Pugliano-Mauro, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UPMC Presbyterian

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

UPMC St. Margaret

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

UPMC Shadyside Place

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Melissa Pugliano-Mauro, MD

Role: CONTACT

412-784-7350

Jeffrey M Plowey, MS, ASCP(HTL)

Role: CONTACT

412-784-7350

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Melissa Pugliano-Mauro, MD

Role: primary

Melissa Pugliano-Mauro, MD

Role: primary

Melissa Pugliano-Mauro, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Byrne M, Aly A. The Surgical Suture. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Mar 14;39(Suppl_2):S67-S72. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz036.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30869751 (View on PubMed)

Eisen DB, Zhuang AR, Hasan A, Sharon VR, Bang H, Crispin MK. 5-0 Polypropylene versus 5-0 fast absorbing plain gut for cutaneous wound closure: a randomized evaluator blind trial. Arch Dermatol Res. 2020 Apr;312(3):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s00403-019-02009-5. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31724097 (View on PubMed)

Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15253184 (View on PubMed)

Sklar LR, Pourang A, Armstrong AW, Dhaliwal SK, Sivamani RK, Eisen DB. Comparison of Running Cutaneous Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis of the Face and Neck: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Mar 1;155(3):321-326. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5057.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30649154 (View on PubMed)

Eilers S, Bach DQ, Gaber R, Blatt H, Guevara Y, Nitsche K, Kundu RV, Robinson JK. Accuracy of self-report in assessing Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I through VI. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Nov;149(11):1289-94. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6101.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24048361 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY22020176

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pilonidal Disease Wound Healing Study
NCT01857128 UNKNOWN PHASE4
Skin Glue Cesarean Study
NCT05903547 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA