Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy

NCT ID: NCT03736811

Last Updated: 2022-05-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

196 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-08

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this is to compare surgical outcomes of anterior colporrhaphy using nonabsorbable sutures with anterior colporrhaphy using absorbable sutures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This trial is a prospective, randomized trial conducted with the aim to determine superiority of anterior colporrhaphy using nonabsorbable sutures over absorbable sutures with regard to the primary outcome. Participants will undergo reconstructive surgery for prolapse, including anterior colporrhaphy using the assigned suture materials under general or spinal anesthesia. The anterior colporrhaphy will be performed in a traditional manner with midline plication of the fibromuscular layer using either 2-0 nonabsorbable (polyester or polypropylene; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) or absorbable (polyglactin 910 or polydioxanone; Ethicon) sutures. Concomitant procedures will be performed as intended prior to surgery. Women with a uterus in situ will undergo hysterectomy and all women will receive an apical suspension procedure, including uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous ligament fixation, and iliococcygeal suspension, according to the preference of surgeon. Posterior colporrhaphy and incontinence surgery will also be performed, if indicated (i.e. women with Bp ≥-1 or documented urodynamic stress incontinence).

Enrollment, treatment and data collection will be standardized by all sites. The study will be a single-blind study, as it is impossible to blind the study surgeon for the surgical procedure to which the subject in assigned. However, all outcomes assessors and the subjects will be blinded to the treatment assignment. Postoperative follow-up will take place after 5 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Patients will undergo a standard gynecological examination including POPQ and fill in questionnaires.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Absorbable suture

will undergo anterior colporrhaphy in a traditional manner using either 2-0 polyglactin 910 \[Vicryl\] or polydioxanone \[PDS II\] sutures.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Polyglactin 910 or polydioxanone

Intervention Type DEVICE

Vicryl or PDS II

Nonabsorbable suture

will undergo anterior colporrhaphy in a traditional manner using either 2-0 polyester \[Ethibond Excel\] or polypropylene \[Prolene\] sutures.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Polyester or polypropylene

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ethibond Excel or prolene

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Polyglactin 910 or polydioxanone

Vicryl or PDS II

Intervention Type DEVICE

Polyester or polypropylene

Ethibond Excel or prolene

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Anterior vaginal descent beyond the hymen (i.e. POPQ Ba\>0)
* Vaginal bulge symptoms (i.e. an affirmative response to the question 3 from the PFDI-20)
* Reconstructive surgery is planned

Exclusion Criteria

* Recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse
* Reconstructive surgery using mesh or obliterative surgery for prolapse is planned
* Known pelvic malignancy
* Systemic glucocorticoid or immunosuppressant treatment
* Subject wishes to retain her uterus
* Subject is unable and unwilling to participate in
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Myung Jae Jeon

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Myung Jae Jeon, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Myung Jae, Jeon

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jeon MJ, Suh DH, Kim CH, Cho HH, Shin JH, Lee SR, Jung YW, Kim SR, Kong MK. Non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures for anterior colporrhaphy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in South Korea. BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 16;10(6):e034218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034218.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32554735 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SNUH-1810-037-977

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Barbed-suture Efficiency Study for Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05760794 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA