Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Clinical relevance:
* To identify factors influencing the surgical template imprecision.
* To overcome risk factors for surgical template imprecision.
* To suggest improvements for highly accuracy of the surgical template especially for immediate loading and avoiding the injury of anatomical structures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Full Digital Workflow for Guided Implant Surgery Using the R2 Gate Software
NCT03814655
Accuracy of Computer-assisted Template-based Implant Placement Using Conventional or Digital Impression
NCT03764176
Dynamic Guided Implant Surgery VS Static Guided Surgery.
NCT06417788
Clinical and Anatomical Factors Influencing Accuracy in Fully Guided Implant Placement.
NCT06255522
Implant/Abutment Module Stability of Original vs Compatible Connections
NCT03524872
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For fully edentulous and extensive edentulous subjects - Class III and IV according to the American College of Prosthodontists - ACP - a visible light cure record bases with occlusal rims will be manufactured for bite registration.
CBCT will be taken with a R2 tray filled with impression material or with record basis in centric relation (CR).
CBCT will be performed using same CT machine with a specific setup and alignment to allow accuracy and reproducibility.
A series of axially sliced image data will be obtained and exported to a personal computer in DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) format.
Models, occlusal rims and R2 trays will be scanned and imported as STL (Stereo Lithography) files.
On the scan models, a virtual wax-up will be designed with the use of 3Shape CAD (Computer Aided Design) software and saved as STL file.
Matching CT and models scan data DICOM files obtained from CBCT and STL files will be imported in a treatment plan software R2GATE version 1.0.3 (Megagen Implant, Korea) and implant insertion will be planned according to the final restoration and bone anatomy.
AnyRidge Megagen implants will be used with length and diameters required by the clinical cases.
A stereolitographic template manufactured by DDX Europa, after final decision of treatment plan, will be used for dental implants insertion using a minimally invasive flapless approach.
To assess accuracy of the surgical template, a new CBCT with specific set-up and alignment after implant insertion will be performed.
Matching post-op CT with the planed position of the implants will be performed using the R2GATE software and measurements between the location of implants on CT at the time of planning and after implantation will be made at the coronal and apical levels to determine the distance between the implant and the planned position buccal, oral, mesial and distal by two independent researchers. Angulation between the implant position and the planned position at coronal and apical level will be also measured.
Statistical analysis will be performed. Teeth supported, mucosal supported and teeth-mucosal supported surgical stereolitographic template will be analyzed separately.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stereolitographic template's accuracy
Evaluating the accuracy of stereolitographic template comparing the final implant insertion to the planned implant position at coronal and apical level
Stereolitographic template
Flapless (atraumatic) dental implants insertion with the aid of a stereolitographic template.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stereolitographic template
Flapless (atraumatic) dental implants insertion with the aid of a stereolitographic template.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* good general healty with no contraindications for implant surgery,
* acceptance of dental implant treatment,
* acceptance of at least 2 CBCT (one at treatment planning and one after surgery)
Exclusion Criteria
* limited mouth opening (imposible to use the surgical stent),
* parkinson desease (imposible to perform an accurate CBCT)
18 Years
89 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
OTHER
MEGAGEN DENTAL IMPLANT ROMANIA
UNKNOWN
Concordia Dent Srl
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Corina Marilena Cristache
Dr Corina Marilena Cristache, DMD, PhD, senior lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
CORINA MARILENA I CRISTACHE, DMD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Concordia Dent Clinic
Bucharest, , Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vasak C, Kohal RJ, Lettner S, Rohner D, Zechner W. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a template-guided (NobelGuide) treatment concept. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):116-23. doi: 10.1111/clr.12038. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
Yatzkair G, Cheng A, Brodie S, Raviv E, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Accuracy of computer-guided implantation in a human cadaver model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1143-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12482. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
Beretta M, Poli PP, Maiorana C. Accuracy of computer-aided template-guided oral implant placement: a prospective clinical study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014 Aug;44(4):184-93. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2014.44.4.184. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:112-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
613/15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.