Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-08-31
2019-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This protocol will include performing fMRIs on a cohort of healthy, active duty, age matched, male personnel to create reference data to compare the fMRI data of study participants.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Test the Effectiveness of Mirror-Box and Mental Visualization Treatments on Phantom Limb Pain
NCT00301444
Optimizing Rehabilitation for Phantom Limb Pain Using Mirror Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
NCT02487966
Preventing Chronification of Phantom Limb Pain Through Mirror Therapy in Conjunction With tDCS
NCT07139483
Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain by Intensive Visual Simulation Therapy
NCT06483035
Virtual Integrated Environment in Decreasing Phantom Limb Pain
NCT01462461
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Control subject group will undergo 3 questionnaires and one functional fMRI exam. Imaging protocol will be identical to preoperative imaging protocol for amputation subjects. This data will aid in establishing baseline fMR activation values for all fMR paradigms tested. The control group will not be randomized to receive either perioperative plasma ball (sham) or mirror therapy.
All Subjects scheduled for surgery will then undergo amputation under the anesthetic technique of provider choice. If regional/neuraxial anesthetic techniques are used they will be standardized up to 1 day preoperative and 3 days postoperative. If using dexmedetomidine and/or ketamine infusions, their use will be limit to intraoperative periods at doses of 0.2 mcg/kg/hr and 0.15mg/kg/hr limit respectively. Anesthesiologist/Anesthetist choice will be permitted for all other intraoperative and postoperative meds. Within 1 week of amputation subjects will again repeat 14 days of their respectively assigned therapy limbs as described above in addition to routine post amputation care. All subjects will then be evaluated at four weeks postoperatively with measures delineated in section 5.(Statistics) to determine 1) incidence and severity of phantom limb pain 2) participation in therapy and ability to meet functional endpoints 3) quality of life. These same measures will be assessed at 12 weeks (3 months) and again at one year post procedure. A repeat fMRI will be obtained in those Subjects participating in the fMRI limb in order to evaluate how the postoperative cortical mapping compares to prior preoperative and postoperative studies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Plasma Ball (Control)
Subjects randomized to standard therapy will participate 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of undergoing a sham therapy with a 22" plasma globe involving contralateral limb interaction with the sphere.
Sham (Comparator) Plasma Ball
will consist of undergoing a sham therapy with a 22" plasma globe involving contralateral limb interaction with the sphere.
Experimental
Subjects randomized to the mirror therapy limb will undergo 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of observing the unaffected limb reflected for 30 minutes in a mirror positioned in the midline to block the view of the affected limb.
Mirror
will undergo 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of observing the unaffected limb reflected for 30 minutes in a mirror positioned in the midline to block the view of the affected limb
Non-Surgical
Subjects will undergo 3 questionnaires and one functional fMRI exam. Imaging protocol will be identical to preoperative imaging protocol for amputation subjects. This data will aid in establishing baseline fMR activation values for all fMR paradigms tested. The control group will not be randomized to receive either perioperative plasma ball (sham) or mirror therapy.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sham (Comparator) Plasma Ball
will consist of undergoing a sham therapy with a 22" plasma globe involving contralateral limb interaction with the sphere.
Mirror
will undergo 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of observing the unaffected limb reflected for 30 minutes in a mirror positioned in the midline to block the view of the affected limb
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Subjects age 18 years or older scheduled for elective amputation;
2. Cooperative, patient scheduled for amputation, with time and availability to do fMRI prior to their operative date;
3. Willing to perform mirror therapy for 14 days prior and post-operative procedure;
4. Subjects who opt for fMRI portion of the study are willing and/or able to tolerate fMRI.
Control (Non-Surgical) Group:
1. Subjects age 18 years to 30;
2. who are non amputated and healthy;
3. Cooperative, with time and availability to do an fMRI;
4. Willing and able to tolerate fMRI.
Exclusion Criteria
2. possessing a contraindication to mirror therapy for example blindness or inability to position properly for the therapy
3. primary central nervous disease such as status post cerebral vascular accident with persistent deficit, Alzheimer's disease or Multiple Sclerosis. In addition, patients with claustrophobia will be excluded from participating in the fMRI portion of this study.
18 Years
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steven R Hanling, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pain Medicine Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mishra S, Bhatnagar S, Gupta D, Diwedi A. Incidence and management of phantom limb pain according to World Health Organization analgesic ladder in amputees of malignant origin. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007 Dec-2008 Jan;24(6):455-62. doi: 10.1177/1049909107304558. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain. 1998 Sep;121 ( Pt 9):1603-30. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.9.1603.
Flor H, Birbaumer N. Phantom limb pain: cortical plasticity and novel therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2000 Oct;13(5):561-4. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200010000-00013.
Arnstein PM. The neuroplastic phenomenon: a physiologic link between chronic pain and learning. J Neurosci Nurs. 1997 Jun;29(3):179-86. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199706000-00005.
Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Apr 22;263(1369):377-86. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0058.
Mercier C, Reilly KT, Vargas CD, Aballea A, Sirigu A. Mapping phantom movement representations in the motor cortex of amputees. Brain. 2006 Aug;129(Pt 8):2202-10. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl180. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
MacIver K, Lloyd DM, Kelly S, Roberts N, Nurmikko T. Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2181-91. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn124. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Montoya P, Larbig W, Unertl K, Topfner S, Grodd W, Taub E, Flor H. Effects of regional anesthesia on phantom limb pain are mirrored in changes in cortical reorganization. J Neurosci. 1997 Jul 15;17(14):5503-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05503.1997.
Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1210-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1210.
Sterr A, Elbert, T, Rostroh B. Functional reorganization of human cerebral cortex and its perceptual concomitants. In: Fahle M, Poggio T. Terceptual Learning. MIT Press, 2002: 138.
Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain. 1983 Nov;17(3):243-256. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90097-0.
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.
Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
Cleeland CS, Nakamura Y, Mendoza TR, Edwards KR, Douglas J, Serlin RC. Dimensions of the impact of cancer pain in a four country sample: new information from multidimensional scaling. Pain. 1996 Oct;67(2-3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03131-4.
BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. No abstract available.
Fischer, J: United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. Congressional Research Service. March 25, 2009
Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF, Heilman KM, Tsao JW. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 22;357(21):2206-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc071927. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NMCSD.2010.0007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.