Perioperative Mirror Therapy and Phantom Limb Pain

NCT ID: NCT02383979

Last Updated: 2019-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

115 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Mirror therapy will consist of observing the unaffected limb reflected in a mirror positioned in the midline to block the view of the affected limb. All therapy sessions will be supervised by a physical therapist with the exception of weekends when the patients will continue therapy on an independent basis. In an effort to objectively demonstrate cortical reorganization associated with mirror therapy, patients can elect to participate in a functional MRI (fMRI) portion of the study. The fMRI would be evaluated prior to initiating the experimental or control therapy (Due to the sensitive timeline in this population and its effect on recruitment, we have amended the protocol to allow recruitment and enrollment to take place even if the timeline does not allow for the fMRI to be executed 2 weeks prior to amputation. Though this would be ideal, we will accept subjects that are only available for day before amputation scans), just before the operative procedure, at four weeks post-operation and then again at one year. All subjects will be evaluated at 4 weeks, 8 weeks (functional physical therapy (PT) tests only) 12 weeks, and 12 months postoperatively to determine 1) the incidence, severity and functional impact of phantom limb pain 2)the ability to meet various specialists' endpoints, to include participation in physical therapy, and 3) overall quality of life which the patients can describe subjectively. This therapy could have a dramatic impact on the long term prognosis of amputees whether due to trauma, metabolic conditions, tumor, or peripheral vascular disease.

This protocol will include performing fMRIs on a cohort of healthy, active duty, age matched, male personnel to create reference data to compare the fMRI data of study participants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects scheduled for amputation will be randomized to either receive perioperative plasma ball (sham) or mirror therapy, which involves a daily session of 30 minutes of performing physical therapy exercises using either a mirror or plasma ball under the supervision of a certified physical therapist. Subjects scheduled to undergo limb amputation who opt in for the fMRI portion of the study will undergo a pre-treatment baseline fMRI (2 weeks prior to scheduled amputation, if possible, but as late as 1 day pre-operative), a post-mirror or sham therapy (preoperative-day before) fMRI, post-operative fMRI at 4 weeks and one year. Performing a baseline fMRI prior to any treatment, will provide objective data regarding the location and extent of cortical involvement prior to initiating mirror therapy. Those subjects randomized to the mirror therapy limb will undergo 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of observing the unaffected limb reflected for 30 minutes in a mirror positioned in the midline to block the view of the affected limb. Those randomized to standard therapy will participate in an equivalent period of time undergoing a sham therapy with a 22" plasma globe involving contralateral limb interaction with the sphere. All therapy sessions will be supervised by a physical therapist with the exception of weekends when the patients will continue therapy on an independent basis. The subjects will then undergo a repeat fMRI (or first baseline, depending if pre-operative fMRI was possible) after completion of preoperative mirror or sham therapies and prior to surgical amputation to evaluate for changes suggestive of mirror therapy induced normalization in cortical patterns.

Control subject group will undergo 3 questionnaires and one functional fMRI exam. Imaging protocol will be identical to preoperative imaging protocol for amputation subjects. This data will aid in establishing baseline fMR activation values for all fMR paradigms tested. The control group will not be randomized to receive either perioperative plasma ball (sham) or mirror therapy.

All Subjects scheduled for surgery will then undergo amputation under the anesthetic technique of provider choice. If regional/neuraxial anesthetic techniques are used they will be standardized up to 1 day preoperative and 3 days postoperative. If using dexmedetomidine and/or ketamine infusions, their use will be limit to intraoperative periods at doses of 0.2 mcg/kg/hr and 0.15mg/kg/hr limit respectively. Anesthesiologist/Anesthetist choice will be permitted for all other intraoperative and postoperative meds. Within 1 week of amputation subjects will again repeat 14 days of their respectively assigned therapy limbs as described above in addition to routine post amputation care. All subjects will then be evaluated at four weeks postoperatively with measures delineated in section 5.(Statistics) to determine 1) incidence and severity of phantom limb pain 2) participation in therapy and ability to meet functional endpoints 3) quality of life. These same measures will be assessed at 12 weeks (3 months) and again at one year post procedure. A repeat fMRI will be obtained in those Subjects participating in the fMRI limb in order to evaluate how the postoperative cortical mapping compares to prior preoperative and postoperative studies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Phantom Limb Pain Phantom Pain Phantom Sensation Pseudomelia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Plasma Ball (Control)

Subjects randomized to standard therapy will participate 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of undergoing a sham therapy with a 22" plasma globe involving contralateral limb interaction with the sphere.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham (Comparator) Plasma Ball

Intervention Type DEVICE

will consist of undergoing a sham therapy with a 22" plasma globe involving contralateral limb interaction with the sphere.

Experimental

Subjects randomized to the mirror therapy limb will undergo 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of observing the unaffected limb reflected for 30 minutes in a mirror positioned in the midline to block the view of the affected limb.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirror

Intervention Type DEVICE

will undergo 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of observing the unaffected limb reflected for 30 minutes in a mirror positioned in the midline to block the view of the affected limb

Non-Surgical

Subjects will undergo 3 questionnaires and one functional fMRI exam. Imaging protocol will be identical to preoperative imaging protocol for amputation subjects. This data will aid in establishing baseline fMR activation values for all fMR paradigms tested. The control group will not be randomized to receive either perioperative plasma ball (sham) or mirror therapy.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sham (Comparator) Plasma Ball

will consist of undergoing a sham therapy with a 22" plasma globe involving contralateral limb interaction with the sphere.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mirror

will undergo 14 days of daily mirror therapy sessions preoperatively which will consist of observing the unaffected limb reflected for 30 minutes in a mirror positioned in the midline to block the view of the affected limb

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Treatment (Surgical) Group:

1. Subjects age 18 years or older scheduled for elective amputation;
2. Cooperative, patient scheduled for amputation, with time and availability to do fMRI prior to their operative date;
3. Willing to perform mirror therapy for 14 days prior and post-operative procedure;
4. Subjects who opt for fMRI portion of the study are willing and/or able to tolerate fMRI.

Control (Non-Surgical) Group:

1. Subjects age 18 years to 30;
2. who are non amputated and healthy;
3. Cooperative, with time and availability to do an fMRI;
4. Willing and able to tolerate fMRI.

Exclusion Criteria

1. inability to cooperate with physical therapy; and
2. possessing a contraindication to mirror therapy for example blindness or inability to position properly for the therapy
3. primary central nervous disease such as status post cerebral vascular accident with persistent deficit, Alzheimer's disease or Multiple Sclerosis. In addition, patients with claustrophobia will be excluded from participating in the fMRI portion of this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven R Hanling, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pain Medicine Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lillian G Murray, MPH

Role: primary

619-804-7765

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mishra S, Bhatnagar S, Gupta D, Diwedi A. Incidence and management of phantom limb pain according to World Health Organization analgesic ladder in amputees of malignant origin. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007 Dec-2008 Jan;24(6):455-62. doi: 10.1177/1049909107304558. Epub 2007 Sep 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17890346 (View on PubMed)

Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain. 1998 Sep;121 ( Pt 9):1603-30. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.9.1603.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9762952 (View on PubMed)

Flor H, Birbaumer N. Phantom limb pain: cortical plasticity and novel therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2000 Oct;13(5):561-4. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200010000-00013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17016358 (View on PubMed)

Arnstein PM. The neuroplastic phenomenon: a physiologic link between chronic pain and learning. J Neurosci Nurs. 1997 Jun;29(3):179-86. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199706000-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9220365 (View on PubMed)

Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Apr 22;263(1369):377-86. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0058.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8637922 (View on PubMed)

Mercier C, Reilly KT, Vargas CD, Aballea A, Sirigu A. Mapping phantom movement representations in the motor cortex of amputees. Brain. 2006 Aug;129(Pt 8):2202-10. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl180. Epub 2006 Jul 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16844715 (View on PubMed)

MacIver K, Lloyd DM, Kelly S, Roberts N, Nurmikko T. Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2181-91. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn124. Epub 2008 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18567624 (View on PubMed)

Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Montoya P, Larbig W, Unertl K, Topfner S, Grodd W, Taub E, Flor H. Effects of regional anesthesia on phantom limb pain are mirrored in changes in cortical reorganization. J Neurosci. 1997 Jul 15;17(14):5503-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05503.1997.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9204932 (View on PubMed)

Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1210-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1210.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10835434 (View on PubMed)

Sterr A, Elbert, T, Rostroh B. Functional reorganization of human cerebral cortex and its perceptual concomitants. In: Fahle M, Poggio T. Terceptual Learning. MIT Press, 2002: 138.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain. 1983 Nov;17(3):243-256. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90097-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6657285 (View on PubMed)

Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15621359 (View on PubMed)

Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11690728 (View on PubMed)

Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8080219 (View on PubMed)

Cleeland CS, Nakamura Y, Mendoza TR, Edwards KR, Douglas J, Serlin RC. Dimensions of the impact of cancer pain in a four country sample: new information from multidimensional scaling. Pain. 1996 Oct;67(2-3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03131-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8951920 (View on PubMed)

BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13688369 (View on PubMed)

Fischer, J: United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. Congressional Research Service. March 25, 2009

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF, Heilman KM, Tsao JW. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 22;357(21):2206-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc071927. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18032777 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NMCSD.2010.0007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Biofeedback for Wheelchair Users
NCT02700178 COMPLETED NA
Spinal Cord Injury Leg Rehabilitation
NCT01498991 TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2