A Study to Test the Effectiveness of Mirror-Box and Mental Visualization Treatments on Phantom Limb Pain
NCT ID: NCT00301444
Last Updated: 2007-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-03-31
2008-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The inclusion of subjects with phantom limb pain in upper extremity amputations has recently been approved.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
mirror-box treatment
Mental visualization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent and written authorization for use or release of health and research study information.
* Any single unilateral upper or lower limb amputation with the presence of phantom limb pain.
* No prior history of vertebral disk disease/condition, sciatica or radiculopathy.
* Normal neurological examination.
* Degree of pain evaluated by VAS scoring a minimum of 3 cm at time of screening for entry into the study, with a minimum of three episodes per week.
* Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits.
Exclusion Criteria
* Bilateral upper or lower limb amputation.
* Presence of traumatic brain injury - permanent or temporary impairments of cognitive, physical, and psychosocial functions with an associated diminished or altered state of consciousness - as indicated by neuropsychological screening which is currently performed routinely on patients by the TBI program at WRAMC and noted in the patient's medical record.
* Known uncontrolled systemic disease- known cancer not in remission, known on-going infection, lupus, kidney disease requiring dialysis, any other systemic disease which might affect ability to participate in this study to its conclusion
* Concurrent participation in another investigational drug or device study for phantom limb pain or participation in the 30 days immediately prior to study enrollment.
* Any condition or situation that, in the investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results, or interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.
* Significant Axis I or II diagnosis determined by a neurologist or psychiatrist in the 6 months prior to entry into the study.
* Subjects with lack of effort as determined by the neurologist or physiatrist. Subjects will be screened for effort using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) first in order to exclude those with blatant exaggeration or malingering.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Department of Defense
FED
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jack W Tsao, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994 Feb;56(2):217-226. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3.
Katz J, Melzack R. Pain 'memories' in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations. Pain. 1990 Dec;43(3):319-336. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90029-D.
Carlen PL, Wall PD, Nadvorna H, Steinbach T. Phantom limbs and related phenomena in recent traumatic amputations. Neurology. 1978 Mar;28(3):211-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.28.3.211.
Sherman RA, Sherman CJ, Parker L. Chronic phantom and stump pain among American veterans: results of a survey. Pain. 1984 Jan;18(1):83-95. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90128-3.
Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, Larbig W, Taub E. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature. 1995 Jun 8;375(6531):482-4. doi: 10.1038/375482a0.
MacLachlan M, McDonald D, Waloch J. Mirror treatment of lower limb phantom pain: a case study. Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jul 22-Aug 5;26(14-15):901-4. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001708913.
Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards CL, Doyon J. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):1171-80. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00369-0.
Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL, Stone L, Al-Aboudi M, Schwartz E, Siva N. Can mirrors alleviate visual hemineglect? Med Hypotheses. 1999 Apr;52(4):303-5. doi: 10.1054/mehy.1997.0651.
Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987 Aug;30(2):191-197. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8.
Ochipa C, Rapcsak SZ, Maher LM, Rothi LJ, Bowers D, Heilman KM. Selective deficit of praxis imagery in ideomotor apraxia. Neurology. 1997 Aug;49(2):474-80. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.2.474.
Finn SB, Perry BN, Clasing JE, Walters LS, Jarzombek SL, Curran S, Rouhanian M, Keszler MS, Hussey-Andersen LK, Weeks SR, Pasquina PF, Tsao JW. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Mirror Therapy for Upper Extremity Phantom Limb Pain in Male Amputees. Front Neurol. 2017 Jul 7;8:267. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00267. eCollection 2017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DCI P05-A008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id