Multicenter Study of EasyTube® Compared to Endotracheal Tube in General Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT02359630

Last Updated: 2017-05-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluation of the EzT in comparison with the endotracheal tube (ETT) for its use during general anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is a recent paper suggesting that general anesthesia with the EzT is feasible and by no means worse than anesthesia with a conventional ETT, and there is little but growing evidence that narcosis with this SAD can be continued during general anesthesia. This brings up several potential benefits: The larger balloons of the EzT are less traumatic to the mucosal tissue compared to a conventional ETT or to a laryngeal mask. Since the insertion of the EzT can be performed without using a laryngoscope, this also reduces tissue damage and tooth injuries caused by a laryngoscope. Also, It has been demonstrated that a similar SAD - the Combitube - can be placed by anesthesiologists with relatively little formal training and that ventilation during elective surgery is feasible. However, such detailed data are missing for the EzT, with only smaller, monocenter-studies available. The next logical step was therefore to systematically evaluate the EzT beyond its purpose as a rescue device in a prospective, randomized multicenter-study to evaluate the use of the EzT in comparison with the ETT during general anesthesia.

Methods 400 patients with ASA status I-II scheduled for elective surgery in 4 centers were randomized to either the EzT group (n=200) or the ETT group (n=200).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EasyTube

Use of EasyTube during general anesthesia

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EasyTube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Insertion for ventilation

Endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Insertion for ventilation

Endotracheal tube

Use of endotrachel tube during general anesthesia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EasyTube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Insertion for ventilation

Endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Insertion for ventilation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EasyTube

Insertion for ventilation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Endotracheal tube

Insertion for ventilation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II and were scheduled for an elective surgery requiring general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* Acute or chronic lung disease
* Patients presenting with sore throat
* Known esophageal disease
* Oropharyngeal abnormalities
* Patients with a cervical spine disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Vienna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael Frass

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Frass, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of Vienna

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Mostafa S, Yanovski B, Croitoru M, Capdevila MD, Sabo E, Ben-David B, Benumof J. The Combitube in elective surgery: a report of 200 cases. Anesthesiology. 2001 Jan;94(1):79-82. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200101000-00016.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11135725 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.