Sonographic Assessment of Reduction in Colles' Fracture

NCT ID: NCT02353065

Last Updated: 2015-02-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Colles fractures are a common type of wrist fracture that often requires manipulation in the Emergency Department. Currently xrays are used to assess whether this has been successful, which are done once the plaster cast has been applied. This study will assess whether ultrasound can be used immediately after the manipulation to check the position, before the plaster cast is applied. This would then be followed by an xray as normal.

The aim is to assess the feasibility of a full study to determine which method is faster, causes less pain, and also to assess if either approach reduces the need for repeat attempts at manipulation and surgical repair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fractures of the distal radius are a frequent cause for presentation to United Kingdom (UK) Emergency Departments, and the Colles' fracture is the most commonly encountered type. These injuries frequently occur in isolation, or associated with only minor injuries, and reduction of displaced fractures is typically performed by Emergency Physicians at the time of first attendance to the hospital.

The usually sequence of events is clinical examination, x-ray imaging to confirm the fracture, then the reduction is performed with appropriate analgesia or anaesthesia, the arm placed in a plaster backslab, and repeat imaging is taken to confirm adequacy of reduction. If the reduction is not satisfactory, repeat manipulation is required.

Haematoma block and Biers block permit x-ray imaging of the manipulated wrist while the anaesthetic action is still effective, permitting re-manipulation without further administration of local anaesthetic. Sedation is usually kept to as short a time as possible, and is not usually maintained while imaging is performed. There is usually some degree of delay while x-rays are taken and made available for viewing, and this wait prolongs the procedure for the patient and the treating clinician. In addition, Biers block cannot be tolerated for long by most patients, so any delay makes it less likely that a re-manipulation can be achieved within the time the patient can tolerate. If a patient has been sedated, a re-manipulation will require a further sedative (or alternative) procedure with the concomitant risks that entails.

Ideally, imaging would be performed rapidly, immediately at the end of the manipulation, prior to application of plaster, allowing confirmation of the reduction or immediate re-manipulation if necessary. This description of imaging provided at the point of care by the treating clinician, aimed at answering a clearly defined question ('is this an adequate reduction?') matches the description of focussed emergency ultrasound in other applications. If ultrasound could be used to assess fracture reduction, it would have potential to save clinician time, patient time and discomfort, and reduced the need for repeated manipulations and surgical repair.

This study intends to assess the feasibility of a full trial of efficacy comparing ultrasound with x-ray to guide the reduction of these fractures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colles' Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Assessment of adequacy of reduction by bedside x-ray during period of intravenous regional anaesthesia (Biers block)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bedside x-ray

Intervention Type RADIATION

Portable x-ray of fracture post-reduction

Ultrasound

Assessment of adequacy of reduction by bedside ultrasound performed by the treating clinician during period of intravenous regional anaesthesia (Biers block)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound imaging

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Point of care ultrasound of fracture site during and post-reduction

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound imaging

Point of care ultrasound of fracture site during and post-reduction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bedside x-ray

Portable x-ray of fracture post-reduction

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults with isolated fractures of the distal radius undergoing manipulation in the Emergency Department with Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia (Biers Block)

Exclusion Criteria

* Age under 16
* Contraindication to Biers block
* Unable to give informed consent
* Multiple injuries
* Open fracture
* Prisoners
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Simon Richards

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Simon Richards

Senior Lecturer Medical Imaging (Ultrasound)

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon Richards

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Teesside University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Preston Hospital

Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Simon Richards

Role: CONTACT

+44 1642 342589

Michael Stewart

Role: CONTACT

+44 7812 203011

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

141/13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.