Comparison Study of Using Ultrasound Guidance for Hematoma Blocks vs. Traditional Approach

NCT ID: NCT00775554

Last Updated: 2015-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Will use visual analog scales to compare effectiveness of traditional hematoma block vs ultrasound guided hematoma block with regards to pain. This will be done for closed forearm fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Forearm Fracture

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

traditional hematoma block

people will receive traditional hematoma block for closed forearm fractures

Group Type OTHER

ultrasound guided hematoma block

Intervention Type OTHER

pt. will receive ultrasound guided hematoma block

ultrasound guided hematoma block

pts. will receive a hematoma block using bedside ultrasound to guide the placement

Group Type OTHER

ultrasound guided hematoma block

Intervention Type OTHER

ultrasound will be used to guide hematoma blocks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ultrasound guided hematoma block

pt. will receive ultrasound guided hematoma block

Intervention Type OTHER

ultrasound guided hematoma block

ultrasound will be used to guide hematoma blocks

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ultrasound ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18
* Closed forearm fracture

Exclusion Criteria

* Mentally impaired, visually impaired or deaf
* Age \< 18
* Alcohol on board
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08-118

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4
Plating Versus Nailing in Pediatric BB Forearm Fractures
NCT06542471 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Hematoma Block Versus Bier Block for Closed Fracture Reduction
NCT05086224 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1