Long-Arm vs Sugar-Tong

NCT ID: NCT03724773

Last Updated: 2019-10-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-31

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a sugar-tong splint is as effective as a long-arm cast in maintaining reduction of pediatric forearm shaft fractures in a randomized, prospective manner. Consented participants will be randomly assigned to be treated with either a sugar-tong splint or a long-arm cast (both standard of care treatments) in REDCap. Each participant will have a 50/50 chance of being assign to either treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Forearm fractures are very common in the pediatric population and can often be treated with closed reduction and immobilization. Immobilization techniques include long-arm casting, short-arm casting and sugar-tong splinting. At the time of injury casts are usually split into two using a cast saw, known as bivalving, to allow for swelling and are overwrapped at a later time. By design sugar-tong splints allow for swelling and are overwrapped or converted to a cast at a later time. Traditionally long-arm casts have been used as the standard mode of immobilization for forearm fractures. Recent evidence demonstrates that long-arm casting is equivalent to better tolerated short-arm casting as an immobilization choice for distal third forearm fractures.1 Further work has shown that sugar-tong splints are also appropriate for treatment of distal third forearm fractures. No study has compared the efficacy of using a long-arm cast versus a sugar-tong splint for treatment of forearm shaft fractures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Closed Fracture of Shaft of Ulna Closed Fracture of Shaft of Radius

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Long-Arm Cast

Reduction and long-arm cast application will be performed by PGY-1 and up residents with adequate training and/or supervision in the required techniques.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Long-Arm Cast

Intervention Type DEVICE

A long-arm cast is a circumferential wrapping of the arm from the fingers to above the elbow with casting material.

Sugar-Tong Splint

Reduction and sugar-tong splint application will be performed by PGY-1 and up residents with adequate training and/or supervision in the required techniques.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sugar-Tong Splint

Intervention Type DEVICE

A sugar-tong splint is the application of hard splinting material on the front and back of the arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Long-Arm Cast

A long-arm cast is a circumferential wrapping of the arm from the fingers to above the elbow with casting material.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sugar-Tong Splint

A sugar-tong splint is the application of hard splinting material on the front and back of the arm.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Single or both bone forearm shaft fractures, follow-up at the St. Louis Children's Hospital and affiliated branches

Exclusion Criteria

* Children below 4 or above 12 years of age
* Distal radius/ulna fracture(s)
* Distal radius/ulna third shaft fracture(s)
* Proximal radius/ulna third shaft fracture(s)
* Radius/ulna fracture(s) not requiring reduction
* Open radius/ulna fracture(s)
* Radius/ulna fracture(s) requiring open reduction in the operating room
* Patient with metabolic defects
* Pathologic radius/ulna fracture(s)
* Previous fractures in the same location (radius/ulna)
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Louis Children's Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bohm ER, Bubbar V, Yong Hing K, Dzus A. Above and below-the-elbow plaster casts for distal forearm fractures in children. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00320.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16391243 (View on PubMed)

Levy J, Ernat J, Song D, Cook JB, Judd D, Shaha S. Outcomes of long-arm casting versus double-sugar-tong splinting of acute pediatric distal forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jan;35(1):11-7. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000196.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24787302 (View on PubMed)

Kamat AS, Pierse N, Devane P, Mutimer J, Horne G. Redefining the cast index: the optimum technique to reduce redisplacement in pediatric distal forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Dec;32(8):787-91. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318272474d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23147621 (View on PubMed)

Alemdaroglu KB, Iltar S, Cimen O, Uysal M, Alagoz E, Atlihan D. Risk factors in redisplacement of distal radial fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1224-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00624.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18519314 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201807196

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Plating Versus Nailing in Pediatric BB Forearm Fractures
NCT06542471 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4