Is Univalving or Bivalving of Long Arm Casts for Forearm Fractures Necessary?

NCT ID: NCT02614690

Last Updated: 2022-01-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to examine the need for univalve or bivalve splitting of casts in pediatric patients with forearm fractures following closed reduction and cast application in a randomized, prospective fashion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Following cast application, little is known regarding the need to split the cast, either in a univalve (a split along a single side of the cast) or bivalve (a split along both sides of the cast) fashion. Theoretically, the splitting of the cast allows for expansion and soft tissue swelling. However, review of the literature yields a paucity of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of splitting a cast. In a study by Nietosvaara et. al, a retrospective examination of 109 pediatric patients initially treated with closed cylindrical casting for closed forearm fractures were evaluated. Of these 109 patients, one-sixth required the initial cast to be split, trimmed, or removed secondary to post-traumatic swelling.

However, the splitting of a cast is not without risks in itself. Once the initial swelling dissipates, a univalved or bivalved cast can become excessively loose. This loosening has been associated with a loss of reduction. If the loss or reduction is substantial, it may require a re-reduction or operation to correct. In addition, with every use of the cast saw a patient is placed at risk for iatrogenic cast saw injury. Thermal burns and abrasions from cast saws can cause lifelong emotional and physical scars for a patient. They can also be an inciting event for litigation against the hospital and or provider, with settlements averaging greater than $12,000 per centimeter of cast saw injury.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fracture of Shaft of Radius and/or Ulna Metaphyseal Fracture of Bone of Upper Limb Fracture of Upper Limb, Level Unspecified

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No split Cast of forearm fractures

Patient will have a "No split cast" long arm cast applied after a closed reduction of forearm fractures. The cast will not be split. 20 patients will be randomized to this arm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No Split Cast of forearm fractures

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Enroll 20 patients per arm: patients who present for long arm casts after closed reduction of forearm fractures will be randomized to one of 3 arms. Patients randomized to "No Split Cast" will have a cast that is not split, this is known as closed cast. The cast will be applied according to our Standard of Care casting. Patients will be then undergo follow-up for clinical and radiographic examinations based on the routine fracture management protocol for approximately 3 months.

Univalve Split Cast of forearm fractures

Patients will have a "Univalve Split Cast" long arm cast applied after undergoing closed reduction of of forearm fractures. This is a cast that is split on only one side of the cast. 20 patients will be randomized to this arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Univalve Split Cast of forearm fractures

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Enroll 20 patients per arm: patients who present for long arm casts after closed reduction of forearm fractures will be randomized to one of 3 arms. Patients randomized to "Univalve Cast" will have a cast that is split on only one side of the cast, this is known as univalve cast. The cast will be applied according to our Standard of Care casting. Patients will be then undergo follow-up for clinical and radiographic examinations based on the routine fracture management protocol for approximately 3 months.

Bivalve Split Cast of forearm fractures

Patients will have a "Bivalve Split Cast" long arm cast applied after they have undergone a closed reduction of of forearm fractures. This is a cast that will be split on both sides of the cast. 20 patients will be randomized to the bivalve split arm cast.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bivalve Split Cast of forearm fractures

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Enroll 20 patients per arm: patients who present for long arm casts after closed reduction of forearm fractures will be randomized to one of 3 arms. Patients randomized to "Bivalve Cast" will have a cast that is split on both sides of the cast, this is known as bivalve cast. The cast will be applied according to our Standard of Care casting. Patients will be then undergo follow-up for clinical and radiographic examinations based on the routine fracture management protocol for approximately 3 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No Split Cast of forearm fractures

Enroll 20 patients per arm: patients who present for long arm casts after closed reduction of forearm fractures will be randomized to one of 3 arms. Patients randomized to "No Split Cast" will have a cast that is not split, this is known as closed cast. The cast will be applied according to our Standard of Care casting. Patients will be then undergo follow-up for clinical and radiographic examinations based on the routine fracture management protocol for approximately 3 months.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Univalve Split Cast of forearm fractures

Enroll 20 patients per arm: patients who present for long arm casts after closed reduction of forearm fractures will be randomized to one of 3 arms. Patients randomized to "Univalve Cast" will have a cast that is split on only one side of the cast, this is known as univalve cast. The cast will be applied according to our Standard of Care casting. Patients will be then undergo follow-up for clinical and radiographic examinations based on the routine fracture management protocol for approximately 3 months.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bivalve Split Cast of forearm fractures

Enroll 20 patients per arm: patients who present for long arm casts after closed reduction of forearm fractures will be randomized to one of 3 arms. Patients randomized to "Bivalve Cast" will have a cast that is split on both sides of the cast, this is known as bivalve cast. The cast will be applied according to our Standard of Care casting. Patients will be then undergo follow-up for clinical and radiographic examinations based on the routine fracture management protocol for approximately 3 months.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A closed isolated radial and/or ulna fracture of the forearm inclusive of metaphyseal and/or shaft level fractures.
* Forearm fractures that require closed reduction (with or without conscious sedation)
* Patients between the ages of 3 and 12 years old

Exclusion Criteria

1. Specific exclusions

* Age less than 3 or greater than 12
* Patients presenting with an associated neurological or vascular injury caused by the fracture
* Patients presenting with an open fracture
* Patients requiring operative treatment following the initial fracture evaluation
* Ipsilateral upper extremity fracture
* Patients intubated or with a pre-existing condition that prevents them from verbalizing symptoms of discomfort
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Connecticut Children's Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark Lee, MD

Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark Lee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Connecticut Children's Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Connecticut Children's Medical Center

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SRC118

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Long-Arm vs Sugar-Tong
NCT03724773 WITHDRAWN NA
Extended vs Flexed Elbow Casting
NCT03935516 WITHDRAWN NA
Plating Versus Nailing in Pediatric BB Forearm Fractures
NCT06542471 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Distal Radius Buckle Fracture RCT
NCT04032873 COMPLETED NA