Treatment of Displaced Medial Epicondyle Fractures In Children
NCT ID: NCT06454929
Last Updated: 2024-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2026-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Medial Epicondyle Fractures in Children and Adolescents
NCT04531085
Management of Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures : Conservative Treatment Versus Surgical Reduction
NCT06459557
Treatment of Non-Dislocated Midshaft Both-Bone Fractures
NCT00314600
Results of "Four Not Techniques" in Delayed and Nonunion Fractures of Lateral Humeral Condyle in Children
NCT03545230
Technique and Preliminary Results of Medial Epicondyle Fracture Fixation Using Anchors and Review of the Literature
NCT07342959
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Optimal treatment for pediatric medial epicondyle fractures continues to be a topic of debate.
In the face of technical advancements, evolving surgical indications, and societal pressures, there is little concrete data demonstrating the superiority of either operative or non-operative treatment.
When a child's medial humeral epicondyle fracture is minimally displaced (less than 2 mm), non-operative therapy is recommended. The PedsQL Pediatric discomfort Questionnaire revealed that children who received non-operative treatment experienced reduced discomfort (3 vs. 15, p = 0.01) and had superior cosmetic results. There is a great deal of disagreement about how to treat displaced fractures (3-15 mm), with some surgeons supporting internal fixation as the non-union rate drops significantly. For upper-extremity athletes who need elbow stability to play their sport, surgery is also advised. Furthermore, it has been proposed that there are no statistically significant variations in outcomes between surgical and non-operative groups.
Fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle in children heal well with 3-4 weeks' immobilization. There is no common consensus in treatment of closed medial epicondyle fractures with \>2 mm displacement (without incarceration of the fragment inside the joint or ulnar nerve dysfunction) that Open reduction and screw fixation improve outcome.
The purpose of our study is to compare the treatment outcomes and complications between operatively and non-operatively treated displaced medial epicondyle fractures. We aim to improve our understanding of the outcomes of these fractures to make treatment recommendations. We hypothesise that there is no difference in treatment outcomes between non-operative and operative treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
operative group
fixation by k-wires or screws
operative
open reduction : fixation by k-wires or screws
non operative group
fixation by cast immobilisation
non-operative
close reduction : by cast Immobilization
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
operative
open reduction : fixation by k-wires or screws
non-operative
close reduction : by cast Immobilization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute fractures were defined as less than7 days between the date of injury and initiation of treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* concomitant fracture or injury of the same upper limb requiring operative intervention
* Open fractures, incarceration of the fragment inside the joint or ulnar nerve dysfunction require surgery
1 Year
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed ezzat mohamed eltaweel
Principal Investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pathy R, Dodwell ER. Medial epicondyle fractures in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015 Feb;27(1):58-66. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000181.
Beck JJ, Bowen RE, Silva M. What's New in Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures? J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Apr;38(4):e202-e206. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000902.
Axibal DP, Carry P, Skelton A, Mayer SW. No Difference in Return to Sport and Other Outcomes Between Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Medial Epicondyle Fractures in Pediatric Upper-Extremity Athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Nov;30(6):e214-e218. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000666.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Medial Epicondyle Fracture
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.