Treatment of Displaced Medial Epicondyle Fractures In Children

NCT ID: NCT06454929

Last Updated: 2024-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare the outcome of the operative and non-operative treatment; for fractures of the medial epicondyle of humerus in children as regards union, alignment and complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

On the distal humerus, posteromedially, is where the medial epicondyle apophysis is situated. It serves as the starting point for the flexor-pronator muscle and the ulnar collateral ligament. 12-20% of pediatric elbow fractures have been reported to be caused by fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle. Thirty to fifty percent of these fractures result in elbow dislocation, and eighteen to twenty percent of the fracture fragments become lodged in the elbow joint. The medial epicondyle fractures typically happen between the ages of 9 and 14 due to the insufficient ossification of the bone, which makes it more prone to failure early than the stronger soft-tissue attachments.

Optimal treatment for pediatric medial epicondyle fractures continues to be a topic of debate.

In the face of technical advancements, evolving surgical indications, and societal pressures, there is little concrete data demonstrating the superiority of either operative or non-operative treatment.

When a child's medial humeral epicondyle fracture is minimally displaced (less than 2 mm), non-operative therapy is recommended. The PedsQL Pediatric discomfort Questionnaire revealed that children who received non-operative treatment experienced reduced discomfort (3 vs. 15, p = 0.01) and had superior cosmetic results. There is a great deal of disagreement about how to treat displaced fractures (3-15 mm), with some surgeons supporting internal fixation as the non-union rate drops significantly. For upper-extremity athletes who need elbow stability to play their sport, surgery is also advised. Furthermore, it has been proposed that there are no statistically significant variations in outcomes between surgical and non-operative groups.

Fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle in children heal well with 3-4 weeks' immobilization. There is no common consensus in treatment of closed medial epicondyle fractures with \>2 mm displacement (without incarceration of the fragment inside the joint or ulnar nerve dysfunction) that Open reduction and screw fixation improve outcome.

The purpose of our study is to compare the treatment outcomes and complications between operatively and non-operatively treated displaced medial epicondyle fractures. We aim to improve our understanding of the outcomes of these fractures to make treatment recommendations. We hypothesise that there is no difference in treatment outcomes between non-operative and operative treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fractures, Bone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

operative by k-wires or screws or non-operative by cast immobilisation treatment (using randomization tables/software
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
no masking

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

operative group

fixation by k-wires or screws

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

operative

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

open reduction : fixation by k-wires or screws

non operative group

fixation by cast immobilisation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

non-operative

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

close reduction : by cast Immobilization

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

operative

open reduction : fixation by k-wires or screws

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

non-operative

close reduction : by cast Immobilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients Age \< 16 years presenting with a ≥2 mm displaced non-incarcerated medial epicondyle fracture with or without concomitant elbow dislocation and normal ulnar nerve function.
* Acute fractures were defined as less than7 days between the date of injury and initiation of treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* systemic bone disease
* concomitant fracture or injury of the same upper limb requiring operative intervention
* Open fractures, incarceration of the fragment inside the joint or ulnar nerve dysfunction require surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed ezzat mohamed eltaweel

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

ahmed ezzat M eltaweel, Physician

Role: CONTACT

01068950894 ext. +20

mohamed K hassan, prof

Role: CONTACT

01015636726 ext. +20

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pathy R, Dodwell ER. Medial epicondyle fractures in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015 Feb;27(1):58-66. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000181.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25564187 (View on PubMed)

Beck JJ, Bowen RE, Silva M. What's New in Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures? J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Apr;38(4):e202-e206. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000902.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27861213 (View on PubMed)

Axibal DP, Carry P, Skelton A, Mayer SW. No Difference in Return to Sport and Other Outcomes Between Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Medial Epicondyle Fractures in Pediatric Upper-Extremity Athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Nov;30(6):e214-e218. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000666.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30277893 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Medial Epicondyle Fracture

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Plating Versus Nailing in Pediatric BB Forearm Fractures
NCT06542471 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4