PRediction of Outcome With ED Intervention for Colles Type Wrist Fractures [PREDICT]
NCT ID: NCT03859999
Last Updated: 2019-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
279 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-11-01
2018-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) is often undertaken in the emergency department (ED) for 'displaced' fractures in an attempt to correct the deformity. The procedure involves a local anaesthetic technique, additional staff, and takes some time to complete. The procedure is not without risk; it can cause bruising, skin tears, complications from the local anaesthetic and can be uncomfortable.
Although fracture positions are usually improved by ED manipulation initially; these fractures can slip back to an unacceptable position over the next 1-2 weeks, despite plaster cast immobilisation. For fractures that slip, open surgery is usually required to correct and hold the fracture with metal plates or wires. This is performed in the operating theatre and requires another visit to the hospital. Preliminary work suggests this affects over a quarter of patients, undergoing ED MUA for Colles' wrist fractures.
If it were possible to reliably identify patients whose fractures were likely to slip and require open surgery despite ED manipulation, unnecessary procedures and visits to hospital could be avoided. This would ensure patients got the right treatment first time and save patients and the NHS time and money.
There are a number of factors that might affect the likelihood of fracture instability and need for surgery. These include patient factors such as age, functional status and presence of osteoporosis (thin weak bones) and the specific position of the fracture. In this study we will be measuring the fracture positions on x-rays of patients with a Colles' fracture to see if we can accurately predict ED MUA failure on the initial x-ray.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Directed Reduction of Colles Type Distal Radial Fractures in ED (UDiReCT)
NCT03868696
Sonographic Assessment of Reduction in Colles' Fracture
NCT02353065
Dislocated Unstable Distal Both-Bone Forearm Fractures in Children
NCT00398268
Is Casting of Displaced Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures Non-inferior to Reduction in General Anesthesia?
NCT05736068
Do Imagined Movements Improve Dexterity in Distal Radius Fractures?
NCT03310151
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We will identify cases from a previously conducted clinical activity analysis of patients who had undergone MUA for Colles' fracture over a two year period at Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital ED. These cases were retrospectively identified (from electronic attendance logs) and followed up until fracture healing or surgery. In this database, the need for subsequent surgery was recorded from electronic records and review of comments in fracture clinic. X-rays of these patients have been identified and anonymised by a member of radiology staff, who is not a member of the research team. These X-rays and the database cases have been given a unique trial number and all identifiable data removed before trial use. The database will be used to provide outcome data for the development of a model to see if x-ray features can reliably predict ED MUA failure. We will exclude Smiths' (anteriorly displaced) fractures and those whom there is no follow up data in the database eg. Patients who were followed up elsewhere.
Anonymised x-rays will be used to develop computer-assisted methods to measure key fracture angles as well as other factors such as degree and position of comminution (fragmentation) and markers of osteoporosis. All x-rays will then by analysed using the system to record these measurements. Depending upon the speed of development, any user facing systems could also be tested on staff to gauge usability and test for inter-rater agreement.
Multivariate analysis of these x-ray features measured by computer, together with the database demographic and outcome data will be used to develop the best model /decision rule to predict likelihood of MUA success. A 'leave one out cross validation' technique will be used to validate such a model and assess whether we could have reduced the ED MUA failure rate without increasing the overall number of open operative procedures. This work will be used to inform a larger prospective study where any decision rules can be assessed and further factors explored with the prospect of adding these to any final computer model.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Analysis of primary radiograph and available demographics
Multivariate analysis of the fracture x-ray features measured by computer, together with the database demographic and outcome data will be used to develop the best model /decision rule to predict likelihood of MUA success
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Those for whom there is no follow up data in the database eg. Patients who were followed up elsewhere.
* Open (compound) fractures (need open surgery to wash out and treat)
* Fractures requiring emergency manipulation due to threatened skin or neurovascular compromise.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Exeter
OTHER
City, University of London
OTHER
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrew Appelboam
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Emergency Department
Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1802595
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.