Delto-Tricipital Compression Syndrome: Treated With Injection of Dextrose
NCT ID: NCT02331069
Last Updated: 2015-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Perineural Injection Therapy in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT02809261
Dextrose, Corticosteroids and Surgical Release in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT04014244
Different Sessions of Perineural Injection With Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT03802435
Short Term Efficacy of 5% Dextrose Injection With Ultrasound Guided Nerve Hydrodissection Method in CTS
NCT06189651
Study of Single Platelet-Rich Plasma Local Injection Vs. Single Corticosteroid Local Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT06209957
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A proposed pathological explanation is that repetitive co-contraction produces irritation and compression of the nerve at the delto-tricipital (D-T) fascial penetration point. Clinically the patient experiences pain localized to that compression point, and traveling distally along the course of some or all of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve.
Perineural injection of dextrose has been previously reported for therapeutic use in chronic pain associated with Achilles tendinopathy. Empirically,injection of D5W with a small needle along the course of the PACN and at the D-T penetrator has been found to resolve both pain and dysfunction (describe dysfunction).
Participants will be randomly assigned to either 1 month of physical therapy or to 0,1,2 and 3 week injection of D5W. The use of standardized measurement tools for pain (0-10 numerical rating scale) and function (Quick DASH) will be utilized to determine baseline status and status at 1 month. At 1 month, subjects receiving therapy will be allowed to cross over to injection treatment and all participants will receive as needed treatment until the 1 year period of follow-up. Thus only 1 month data is randomized but long term data will be gathered.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dextrose 5% (D5W) Injection
Glucose injection in 5% concentration, administered weekly X 4 times in a volume of 12 ml or less.
Dextrose 5% (D5W)
0,1,2, and 3 week injection sessions consisting of injection of 2 ml of D5W into the D-T groove at the point of maximal pain at 1-2 cm depth, followed by subcutaneous injection of D5W at 4 cm intervals along the course of the PACN if tenderness is present.
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy for a month in the posterior deltoid region 3 times a week.
Physical therapy
Three times weekly X 3 week sessions to include myofascial release, exercise, and one modality.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dextrose 5% (D5W)
0,1,2, and 3 week injection sessions consisting of injection of 2 ml of D5W into the D-T groove at the point of maximal pain at 1-2 cm depth, followed by subcutaneous injection of D5W at 4 cm intervals along the course of the PACN if tenderness is present.
Physical therapy
Three times weekly X 3 week sessions to include myofascial release, exercise, and one modality.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pain rating 6 or more on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS)
3. Reproduction of pain with provocative maneuvers. Lifting a 6 pound weight to 60 degrees with the below at 40 degrees of elbow extension and the clinician creating a flexion force on the elbow which the participant resists. (Need a picture)
4. Pain more than 3 months?
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pain in other part of the body more than 4/10.
3. Taking narcotics for pain.
4. Pain with testing of shoulder laxity.
5. Massive rupture of rotator cuff (complete width tear) evidenced by examination or MRI scan.
6. Level III-IV or more shoulder arthritis on plain film of shoulder.
7. Other peripheral neuropathy.
8. Unstable psychiatric status
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Abierta Interamericana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Miguel Slullitel
Professor of Orthopedic Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mailand Ezequiel, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Non affiliated
Dean Reeves
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Non Affiliated
David Rabago
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Non affiliated
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinica Scanner
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
Instituto Jaime Slullitel
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Ezequiel Mailand, MD
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Apr;38(4):641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.032. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
Rabago D, Kijowski R, Woods M, Patterson JJ, Mundt M, Zgierska A, Grettie J, Lyftogt J, Fortney L. Association between disease-specific quality of life and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes in a clinical trial of prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;94(11):2075-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
Yelland MJ, Sweeting KR, Lyftogt JA, Ng SK, Scuffham PA, Evans KA. Prolotherapy injections and eccentric loading exercises for painful Achilles tendinosis: a randomised trial. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Apr;45(5):421-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.057968. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UAI Protocol number 01006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.