Does it Matter the Volume of Injectate on the Outcome of Ultrasound-guided Perineural Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT07283874

Last Updated: 2025-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-31

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is an entrapment neuropathy affecting the median nerve with a lifetime prevalence of about 8% in the adult population. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurs with the symptoms of intermittent nocturnal paresthesia and dysesthesia, followed by loss of sensation, weakness, and thenar muscle atrophy in later stages.

Although the etiology of CTS is multifactorial, compression of the median nerve in a space-limited osteofibrous canal at wrist level was proposed.

The gold standard of diagnosis is electrophysiological study, but ultrasonography was applied in recent decades for a better approach to the morphology change of the median nerve.Nerve hydrodissection (HD) is a widely used technique that involves the injection of fluid to separate the nerve from the surrounding structures.

HD is now considered a novel approach for the treatment of CTS with safe and outstanding long-term effects. A potential benefit of HD is to release the pressure on the "free nerves supplying the main nerves," called "nervi nervorum." Early, the compression of the vasa nervorum would affect venous outflow, causing the accumulation of toxins in the affected part. Then, the lymphatic drainage, located outside the epineurium, would undergo compressive effects.

HD can also decrease the gliding resistance of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel, which is considered a principal patho-mechanical cause of nerve injury.

Hydrodissection HD of the entrapped median nerve is considered a safe and efficacious approach for treatment of mild to moderate CTS and could be offered to patients with severe CTS if surgery is refused or can't be done due to other medical comorbidities. The use of US-guided HD could improve symptom severity, functional status, and the US parameters of nerve entrapment. HD has a long-term efficacy outcome; 88.6% of patients reported an effective outcome, and this may vary according to the initial severity status.

Different types of injectants are available and studied, with no clear indication of use for each type. However, PRP, D5W, and HA were more efficient than NS as regards subjective and objective improvement. PRP and HA were more effective for long-term nerve recovery, while HA was preferred for the earliest response. So, we recommend making the choice based on every patient's severity scale and electrophysiological scales, which means that for patients with mild forms and severe pain.

Injection of a large volume could be a better option in order to dissect a larger area, provide a better environment for the nerve repair mechanisms, and release the vascular and neural compressive elements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

wrists undergoing ultrasound guided perineural injection of 5 ml total volume of injectate (3ml dextrose 5% +1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide + 1 ml lidocaine 2%) for carpel tunnel syndrome

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dextrose 5%

Intervention Type DRUG

patients injected with 8ml dextrose 5%

Triamcinolone Acetonide (Aristocort® C)

Intervention Type DRUG

patients injected with 1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide

Lidocaine 2 %

Intervention Type DRUG

patients injected with 1ml lidocaine 2%)

Group B

wrists undergoing ultrasound guided perineural injection of 10 ml total volume of injectate (8 ml dextrose 5% +1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide + 1 ml lidocaine 2%) for carpel tunnel syndrome

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dextrose 5%

Intervention Type DRUG

patients injected with 3 ml dextrose 5%

Triamcinolone Acetonide (Aristocort® C)

Intervention Type DRUG

patients injected with 1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide

Lidocaine 2 %

Intervention Type DRUG

patients injected with 1ml lidocaine 2%)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dextrose 5%

patients injected with 8ml dextrose 5%

Intervention Type DRUG

Dextrose 5%

patients injected with 3 ml dextrose 5%

Intervention Type DRUG

Triamcinolone Acetonide (Aristocort® C)

patients injected with 1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine 2 %

patients injected with 1ml lidocaine 2%)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients aged 20-80 years old 2. Patients diagnosed with idiopathic CTS. 3. Abnormal electrophysiological analysis showing mild to moderate CTS 4. Symptoms and signs including:

1. pain or paraesthesia in the median nerve innervated area (at least two digits with such symptoms between the thumb and the 4th digit) for more than 6 months not responding to conservative management including (vitamin B complex, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral steroids, and/or night splint)
2. positive Phalen test, Tinel sign, or flick sign
3. The patient's initial examination was based on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations prior to their inclusion and confirmed by nerve conduction studies

Exclusion Criteria

* 1- Age less than 20 years 2- severe CTS (abductor policies brevis muscle atrophy with distal latency time \>6.5 MS).

3- MN electrophysiology study revealing absent potentials. 4- its cross-sectional area (CSA) \>15 mm2 by sonographic checkup. 5- previous surgery of carpal tunnel. 6- previous wrist injection within 3 months 7- history of peripheral nerve injuries (brachial plexopathy, cervical radiculopathy or thoracic outlet syndrome) 8- CTS due to systemic causes, for example, endocrinal and/or pregnancy, rheumatoid arthritis, gouty or psoriatic osteoarthritis.

9- concurrent use of antihistaminic, or cortisone. 10- Participant refusal. 11- local infection. presence of coagulopathy, and/or allergy to the included medications were also points for patients' exclusion from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Osama Kamal Abdullah Mohamed

Resident doctor at Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

volume of injectate CTS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id