Does it Matter the Volume of Injectate on the Outcome of Ultrasound-guided Perineural Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT07283874
Last Updated: 2025-12-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE4
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-31
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Although the etiology of CTS is multifactorial, compression of the median nerve in a space-limited osteofibrous canal at wrist level was proposed.
The gold standard of diagnosis is electrophysiological study, but ultrasonography was applied in recent decades for a better approach to the morphology change of the median nerve.Nerve hydrodissection (HD) is a widely used technique that involves the injection of fluid to separate the nerve from the surrounding structures.
HD is now considered a novel approach for the treatment of CTS with safe and outstanding long-term effects. A potential benefit of HD is to release the pressure on the "free nerves supplying the main nerves," called "nervi nervorum." Early, the compression of the vasa nervorum would affect venous outflow, causing the accumulation of toxins in the affected part. Then, the lymphatic drainage, located outside the epineurium, would undergo compressive effects.
HD can also decrease the gliding resistance of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel, which is considered a principal patho-mechanical cause of nerve injury.
Hydrodissection HD of the entrapped median nerve is considered a safe and efficacious approach for treatment of mild to moderate CTS and could be offered to patients with severe CTS if surgery is refused or can't be done due to other medical comorbidities. The use of US-guided HD could improve symptom severity, functional status, and the US parameters of nerve entrapment. HD has a long-term efficacy outcome; 88.6% of patients reported an effective outcome, and this may vary according to the initial severity status.
Different types of injectants are available and studied, with no clear indication of use for each type. However, PRP, D5W, and HA were more efficient than NS as regards subjective and objective improvement. PRP and HA were more effective for long-term nerve recovery, while HA was preferred for the earliest response. So, we recommend making the choice based on every patient's severity scale and electrophysiological scales, which means that for patients with mild forms and severe pain.
Injection of a large volume could be a better option in order to dissect a larger area, provide a better environment for the nerve repair mechanisms, and release the vascular and neural compressive elements.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
wrists undergoing ultrasound guided perineural injection of 5 ml total volume of injectate (3ml dextrose 5% +1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide + 1 ml lidocaine 2%) for carpel tunnel syndrome
Dextrose 5%
patients injected with 8ml dextrose 5%
Triamcinolone Acetonide (Aristocort® C)
patients injected with 1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide
Lidocaine 2 %
patients injected with 1ml lidocaine 2%)
Group B
wrists undergoing ultrasound guided perineural injection of 10 ml total volume of injectate (8 ml dextrose 5% +1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide + 1 ml lidocaine 2%) for carpel tunnel syndrome
Dextrose 5%
patients injected with 3 ml dextrose 5%
Triamcinolone Acetonide (Aristocort® C)
patients injected with 1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide
Lidocaine 2 %
patients injected with 1ml lidocaine 2%)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dextrose 5%
patients injected with 8ml dextrose 5%
Dextrose 5%
patients injected with 3 ml dextrose 5%
Triamcinolone Acetonide (Aristocort® C)
patients injected with 1 ml Triamcinolone acetonide
Lidocaine 2 %
patients injected with 1ml lidocaine 2%)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. pain or paraesthesia in the median nerve innervated area (at least two digits with such symptoms between the thumb and the 4th digit) for more than 6 months not responding to conservative management including (vitamin B complex, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral steroids, and/or night splint)
2. positive Phalen test, Tinel sign, or flick sign
3. The patient's initial examination was based on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations prior to their inclusion and confirmed by nerve conduction studies
Exclusion Criteria
3- MN electrophysiology study revealing absent potentials. 4- its cross-sectional area (CSA) \>15 mm2 by sonographic checkup. 5- previous surgery of carpal tunnel. 6- previous wrist injection within 3 months 7- history of peripheral nerve injuries (brachial plexopathy, cervical radiculopathy or thoracic outlet syndrome) 8- CTS due to systemic causes, for example, endocrinal and/or pregnancy, rheumatoid arthritis, gouty or psoriatic osteoarthritis.
9- concurrent use of antihistaminic, or cortisone. 10- Participant refusal. 11- local infection. presence of coagulopathy, and/or allergy to the included medications were also points for patients' exclusion from the study
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Osama Kamal Abdullah Mohamed
Resident doctor at Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
volume of injectate CTS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id