Dextrose, Corticosteroids and Surgical Release in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT04014244

Last Updated: 2021-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of 5% dextrose, local corticosteroids injections and surgical release in patients with electrodiagnostically (EDx) mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The investigators hypothesize that in patients with mild to moderate CTS (1) local 5% dextrose injections is non-inferior to local corticosteroid injections at 12 months after treatment, and that (2) local 5% dextrose injections are of non-inferior effectiveness compared to surgical release at 6 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgical release of the carpal ligament is a standard treatment of the median nerve entrapment at the wrist. Local corticosteroid injections are also an established alternative, particularly for EDx mild or moderate CTS, although majority of patients still needs surgical decompression within 1 year. Majority of studies concluded that after more than 6 months of treatment surgical decompression is better than local corticosteroids injections. Furthermore, corticosteroids also have a number of side effects, including crystal induced synovitis, tendon rupture, axon and myelin degeneration, soft tissue atrophy, skin thinning, steroid flare and hot flushes. Therefore, it would be very useful to have an effective alternative substance for injections, without these problems. Perineural injection of dextrose also seems to be a promising treatment for entrapment neuropathies. To date only two studies investigated the effectiveness of 5% dextrose injections in patients with CTS. Authors concluded that this is an effective treatment, that is for patients with mild or moderate CTS even more beneficial than corticosteroid injections at 6 months follow-up. It was suggested that perineural injection of 5% dextrose decreases neurogenic inflammation. As 5% dextrose has osmolarity similar to normal saline, this formulation seems particularly promising. These expectations were supported in studies including animals and humans reporting no harmful effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Nerve Compression Syndromes Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Patients with bilateral CTS symptoms and EDx mild to moderate CTS will be included. In the first part of the study examiner will randomize substance for left hand infiltration using a dice (odd number - corticosteroids; even number - 5% glucose). Right hand will be infiltrated with the remaining substance. In the second part of the study examiner will randomize treatment procedure for left hand using a dice (odd number - corticosteroids or 5% glucose; even number - surgery). Substance for injection will be determined according to the results of the first part of the study - more effective one, or in case of non-inferiority 5% glucose will be used. In all patients included in the second part of the study surgical release will be performed by the same plastic surgeon. Both treatments will be performed maximally 2 months after diagnosis, with maximum period between them of 1 week.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Each of three investigators performing one part of diagnostic evaluation (history and focal neurologic examination, EDx and (3) ultrasonographic (US) studies) will be blinded for findings of other parts of evaluation. Furthermore, patients will be blinded for laterality of the injected substance.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Corticosteroids vs. Dextrose

In the first part of the study examiner will randomize substance for left hand infiltration using a dice (odd number - corticosteroids; even number - 5% glucose). Right hand will be infiltrated with the remaining substance.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Corticosteroid vs. Dextrose

Intervention Type DRUG

US guided injection of corticosteroid in one hand and 5% glucose in the other will be performed in accordance with randomization. In a syringe both substances will be diluted using 0.9% NaCl to a total injection volume of 6 ml. In-plane ulnar approach will be used to visualize the median nerve at the level of the pisiform bone. A standard 23 gauge needle will be inserted in the carpal tunnel with the needle tip positioned between retinaculum and median nerve.

Corticosteroids or Dextrose vs. Surgery

In the second part of the study examiner will randomize treatment procedure for left hand using a dice (odd number - corticosteroids or 5% glucose; even number - surgery). Substance for injection will be determined according to the results of the first part of the study - more effective one, or in case of non-inferiority 5% glucose will be used. Surgical release will be performed by the same plastic surgeon. Both treatments will be performed maximally 2 months after diagnosis, with maximum period between them of 1 week.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Corticosteroid or Dextrose vs. Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection will be performed unilaterally, after randomization of sides, by the same examiner as in the first part of the study. In all patients included in the second part of the study surgical release will be performed by the same plastic surgeon. The procedure will be performed under local anesthesia, following the same standard protocol. Both treatments will be performed maximally 2 months after diagnosis, with maximum period between them of 1 week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Corticosteroid vs. Dextrose

US guided injection of corticosteroid in one hand and 5% glucose in the other will be performed in accordance with randomization. In a syringe both substances will be diluted using 0.9% NaCl to a total injection volume of 6 ml. In-plane ulnar approach will be used to visualize the median nerve at the level of the pisiform bone. A standard 23 gauge needle will be inserted in the carpal tunnel with the needle tip positioned between retinaculum and median nerve.

Intervention Type DRUG

Corticosteroid or Dextrose vs. Surgery

Injection will be performed unilaterally, after randomization of sides, by the same examiner as in the first part of the study. In all patients included in the second part of the study surgical release will be performed by the same plastic surgeon. The procedure will be performed under local anesthesia, following the same standard protocol. Both treatments will be performed maximally 2 months after diagnosis, with maximum period between them of 1 week.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Triamcinolone injections versus 5% dextrose Triamcinolone injections or 5% dextrose versus Carpal tunnel release

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. numbness and tingling in at least two out of the first four digits;
2. symptoms exacerbated during the night or in the morning, on holding the objects or repetitive use of the hand;
3. symptoms relieved by shaking the hand or reposition of the arm.

In addition to these clinical criteria for recruitment EDx confirmation will also be needed. Only patients with bilateral EDx mild to moderate CTS will be included.

Exclusion Criteria

1. polyneuropathy, symptoms of polyneuropathy, and all conditions causing polyneuropathy (e.g., diabetes);
2. multiple mononeuropathy (e.g., hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies, syndrome Lewis Sumner);
3. motor neuron disorders (e.g., monomelic amyotrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - ALS);
4. brachial plexopathy;
5. other focal neuropathies affecting upper limbs (e.g., other median neuropathies, ulnar neuropathies, thoracic outlet syndrome); or
6. previous surgery or local injections for CTS.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gregor Omejec

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Ljubljana, Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Neurophysiology

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Slovenia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gregor Omejec, PT, DSc

Role: CONTACT

+386 1 522 1502

Simon Podnar, MD

Role: CONTACT

+386 1 522 3076

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Verdugo RJ, Salinas RS, Castillo J, Cea JG. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD001552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001552.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12917909 (View on PubMed)

Marshall S, Tardif G, Ashworth N. Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD001554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001554.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17443508 (View on PubMed)

Atroshi I, Flondell M, Hofer M, Ranstam J. Methylprednisolone injections for the carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 3;159(5):309-17. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-5-201309030-00004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24026316 (View on PubMed)

Andreu JL, Ly-Pen D, Millan I, de Blas G, Sanchez-Olaso A. Local injection versus surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome: neurophysiologic outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jul;125(7):1479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24321619 (View on PubMed)

Ly-Pen D, Andreu JL, de Blas G, Sanchez-Olaso A, Millan I. Surgical decompression versus local steroid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome: a one-year, prospective, randomized, open, controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb;52(2):612-9. doi: 10.1002/art.20767.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15692981 (View on PubMed)

Ly-Pen D, Andreu JL, Millan I, de Blas G, Sanchez-Olaso A. Comparison of surgical decompression and local steroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: 2-year clinical results from a randomized trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Aug;51(8):1447-54. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes053. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22467087 (View on PubMed)

Celik G, Ilik MK. Effects of Two Different Treatment Techniques on the Recovery Parameters of Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Six-Month Follow-up Study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;33(2):166-70. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000243.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26657237 (View on PubMed)

Peters-Veluthamaningal C, Winters JC, Groenier KH, Meyboom-de Jong B. Randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Jul 29;11:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-54.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20670438 (View on PubMed)

Ustun N, Tok F, Yagz AE, Kizil N, Korkmaz I, Karazincir S, Okuyucu E, Turhanoglu AD. Ultrasound-guided vs. blind steroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: A single-blind randomized prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;92(11):999-1004. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31829b4d72.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23811617 (View on PubMed)

Lee JY, Park Y, Park KD, Lee JK, Lim OK. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel injection using in-plane ulnar approach: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(29):e350. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000350.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25546691 (View on PubMed)

Makhlouf T, Emil NS, Sibbitt WL Jr, Fields RA, Bankhurst AD. Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of carpal tunnel injections using sonographic needle guidance. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;33(6):849-58. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2438-5. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24277115 (View on PubMed)

Wang JC, Liao KK, Lin KP, Chou CL, Yang TF, Huang YF, Wang KA, Chiu JW. Efficacy of Combined Ultrasound-Guided Steroid Injection and Splinting in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):947-956. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28209506 (View on PubMed)

Wang PH, Tsai CL, Lee JS, Wu KC, Cheng KI, Jou IM. Effects of topical corticosteroids on the sciatic nerve: an experimental study to adduce the safety in treating carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011 Mar;36(3):236-43. doi: 10.1177/1753193410390760. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21282223 (View on PubMed)

Wu YT, Ho TY, Chou YC, Ke MJ, Li TY, Tsai CK, Chen LC. Six-month Efficacy of Perineural Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Aug;92(8):1179-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28778254 (View on PubMed)

Wu YT, Ke MJ, Ho TY, Li TY, Shen YP, Chen LC. Randomized double-blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Ann Neurol. 2018 Oct;84(4):601-610. doi: 10.1002/ana.25332. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30187524 (View on PubMed)

Hashimoto K, Sakura S, Bollen AW, Ciriales R, Drasner K. Comparative toxicity of glucose and lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;23(5):444-50. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90025-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9773695 (View on PubMed)

Sakura S, Chan VW, Ciriales R, Drasner K. The addition of 7.5% glucose does not alter the neurotoxicity of 5% lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1995 Jan;82(1):236-40. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00028.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7832306 (View on PubMed)

Tsui BCH, Kropelin B. The electrophysiological effect of dextrose 5% in water on single-shot peripheral nerve stimulation. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1837-1839. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153020.84780.A5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15920223 (View on PubMed)

Dufour E, Donat N, Jaziri S, Kurdi O, Couturier C, Dreyfus JF, Fischler M. Ultrasound-guided perineural circumferential median nerve block with and without prior dextrose 5% hydrodissection: a prospective randomized double-blinded noninferiority trial. Anesth Analg. 2012 Sep;115(3):728-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31825fa37d. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22745114 (View on PubMed)

Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Nov;75(11):1585-92. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8245050 (View on PubMed)

Ng AWH, Griffith JF, Lee RKL, Tse WL, Wong CWY, Ho PC. Ultrasound carpal tunnel syndrome: additional criteria for diagnosis. Clin Radiol. 2018 Feb;73(2):214.e11-214.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28859853 (View on PubMed)

Lee YS, Choi E. Ultrasonographic changes after steroid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Nov;46(11):1521-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2738-y. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28770310 (View on PubMed)

Gonzalez-Suarez CB, Fidel BC, Cabrera JTC, Dela Cruz FC, Gesmundo MVT, Regala CFG, Saratan R, Suarez CG, Grimmer K. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Parameters in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Additional Criteria for Diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Nov;38(11):3043-3052. doi: 10.1002/jum.15012. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30993769 (View on PubMed)

Smith J, Wisniewski SJ, Finnoff JT, Payne JM. Sonographically guided carpal tunnel injections: the ulnar approach. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Oct;27(10):1485-90. doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.10.1485.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18809959 (View on PubMed)

Scholten RJ, Mink van der Molen A, Uitdehaag BM, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Surgical treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD003905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003905.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17943805 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Treatment SZP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.