The Modifying Eating and Lifestyles at School Study

NCT ID: NCT02309840

Last Updated: 2024-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6873 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of introducing healthier, chef-enhanced foods and/or environmental modifications (choice architecture) on selection and consumption of school foods among elementary and middle school students.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Project Modifying Eating and Lifestyles at School (MEALS) was a school-based study developed by the nonprofit organization Project Bread (www.ProjectBread.org) and the Harvard School of Public Health. Project Bread hired a professional chef to work with several schools in a low-income, urban school district in Massachusetts to enhance the palatability and nutrient profile of the school meals. Four schools were randomly assigned to receive the professional chef. Additionally, two schools in that district and four schools in a second school district were randomly assigned to receive a behavioral psychology intervention to influence the selection and consumption of the healthier foods offered. Selection and consumption were assessed at baseline, up to 3 months post-implementation (short-term implementation for chef-enhanced meals), up to 4 months post-implementation (long-term implementation for behavioral psychology) and/or up to 7 months post-implementation (long-term implementation for chef-enhanced meals).

Primary Aim 1: to examine the impact of introducing healthier, chef-enhanced foods with increased palatability on selection and consumption among elementary and middle school students. It is hypothesized that there will be an increase in the selection and consumption of entrees, fruits, and vegetables in schools where healthier, chef-enhanced foods are served.

Aim 2: to examine the impact of physical modifications to the placement and displays of foods in the cafeteria on selection/consumption among elementary and middle school students. It is hypothesized that there will be an increase in selection and consumption of entrees, milk, fruits, and vegetables when modifications are made.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Meals Food Habits

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control

Students received standard meals in a standard cafeteria environment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Chef

Students were exposed to chef-enhanced meals

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chef-enhanced meals

Intervention Type OTHER

meals prepared by a professional chef with enhanced palatability

choice architecture

Students were exposed to modifications to the physical environment in the cafeteria to "nudge" students towards healthier choices

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice architecture

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

1. Place vegetables at the beginning of the lunch line.
2. Place fruits in attractive bowls or trays lined with appealing fabric, and place other fruit options next to the cash registers.
3. Promote fruits and vegetables with prominently displayed signage and images.
4. Place white milk selection in front of sugar-sweetened milk (e.g. chocolate milk) or at eye-level.

Chef and choice architecture

Students were exposed to both chef-enhanced meals and modifications to the physical environment in the cafeteria to "nudge" students towards healthier choices

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

choice architecture

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

1. Place vegetables at the beginning of the lunch line.
2. Place fruits in attractive bowls or trays lined with appealing fabric, and place other fruit options next to the cash registers.
3. Promote fruits and vegetables with prominently displayed signage and images.
4. Place white milk selection in front of sugar-sweetened milk (e.g. chocolate milk) or at eye-level.

Chef-enhanced meals

Intervention Type OTHER

meals prepared by a professional chef with enhanced palatability

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

choice architecture

1. Place vegetables at the beginning of the lunch line.
2. Place fruits in attractive bowls or trays lined with appealing fabric, and place other fruit options next to the cash registers.
3. Promote fruits and vegetables with prominently displayed signage and images.
4. Place white milk selection in front of sugar-sweetened milk (e.g. chocolate milk) or at eye-level.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Chef-enhanced meals

meals prepared by a professional chef with enhanced palatability

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Smart Cafe

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Students in grades 1-8 attending a participating school and receiving a school meal on a study day

Exclusion Criteria

* Bringing a lunch from home on a study day or not eating lunch in the cafeteria on a study day
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eric B. Rimm

Professor of Epidemiology and Nutrition

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cohen JF, Richardson SA, Cluggish SA, Parker E, Catalano PJ, Rimm EB. Effects of choice architecture and chef-enhanced meals on the selection and consumption of healthier school foods: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 May;169(5):431-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3805.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25798990 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21198-103

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fast Food Feeding in Youth
NCT00121706 COMPLETED NA
Kids' Choice Restaurant Program
NCT02511938 COMPLETED NA