Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-12-31
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-invasive Quantification of Atrial Fibrosis by MRI in Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02885883
Sparsity-based Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cardiac Arrhythmias
NCT02741180
Technical Development of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT00027170
A Pilot Investigation Detecting Cryoablation Scar by 3D Late Gadolinium Enhancement
NCT02875730
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Development for High Resolution Atrial Structural and Functional Characterization
NCT06617624
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are several reasons why lesions produced with cryoablation procedures may offer better visualization on DE-MRI as compared to radiofrequency ablation. First, the circumferential lesion generated by cryoablation is created utilizing a uniform distribution of energy in a simultaneous fashion to the entire pulmonary vein antrum. In contrast, lesions created by radiofrequency ablation are produced sequentially and each lesion has variable contact with the myocardium and therefore variable energy delivery. As a consequence, lesions created with radiofrequency ablation may not uniformly penetrate the myocardium, creating a situation whereby contiguous lesions have variable depth. This may explain the heterogeneity of scar visualization on DE-MRI in earlier studies. Furthermore, despite the advantages and accuracy of electroanatomical mapping, due to variations in tissue architecture in the pulmonary vein antrum, there may be technical challenges in ensuring truly contiguous lesions. Unfortunately, the non-contiguous nature of radiofrequency ablation lesions may not be become evident until localized tissue edema has subsided and clinical evidence of recurrent atrial fibrillation is observed several months after the procedure. Cryoablation offers a theoretical advantage in this regard by producing near uniform tissue contact as well as an ability to assess for gaps in tissue contact by injecting contrast dye under fluoroscopic visualization during the period of pulmonary vein occlusion to demonstrate areas of poor tissue contact where contrast dye escapes from the occluded pulmonary vein. Another advantage is that the cryoballoon is in contact with a greater amount of myocardium in the pulmonary vein antrum than the radiofrequency ablation catheter due to the larger surface area of the 23 or 28mm diameter cryoballoon as compared to the 3.5 or 4mm diameter radiofrequency ablation catheter. The smaller surface area of the radiofrequency ablation lesions may be missed in the delayed enhancement sequences on MRI, which are acquired at a greater slice thickness as compared with standard acquisition. Therefore, the cryoablation lesions may be more likely to be visualized, as there is a greater probability that some portion of the ablated myocardium will be present in a given imaging slice of delayed enhanced atrial myocardium. Finally, the nature of cryoablation itself may cause less inflammation in the short term in the atrial myocardium as compared to radiofrequency ablation due to the fact that the tissue is frozen and not heated. The effect of this on ability to visualize ablated tissue on DE-MRI is unknown, as none of the published studies have examined cryoablation specifically.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Repeat Cardiac MRI Post Cryoablation
All subjects in this study receive a follow up delayed enhanced cardiac MRI 2-6 weeks after they undergo a cryoablation procedure.
Delayed Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Subjects in this study get a Delayed Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2-6 weeks after they undergo cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. This MRI is compared to the pre-procedure cardiac MRI to determine if it possible to visualize the cryoablation lesions.
Cryoablation
All subjects in this study undergo a cryoballoon ablation procedure to achieve pulmonary vein isolation for the purposes of treatment of atrial fibrillation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Delayed Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Subjects in this study get a Delayed Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2-6 weeks after they undergo cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. This MRI is compared to the pre-procedure cardiac MRI to determine if it possible to visualize the cryoablation lesions.
Cryoablation
All subjects in this study undergo a cryoballoon ablation procedure to achieve pulmonary vein isolation for the purposes of treatment of atrial fibrillation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A diagnosis of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation refractory to medical therapy and planned to undergo a cryoablation procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous atrial fibrillation ablation
* Patients who are not candidates for cryoablation procedure for treatment of atrial fibrillation
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Saint Luke's Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sanjaya Gupta, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Saint Luke's Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Saint Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-104
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.