Multi-level Communications and Access Strategies to Improve the Food Environment
NCT ID: NCT02279849
Last Updated: 2018-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
444 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2014-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating an Enhanced Home-delivered Meal Program on Older Adults' Health and Well-being
NCT06401694
Improving Blood Pressure Control Among Food Insecure Hypertensive Adults
NCT05877898
Connecting Friends and Health Workers to Boost COVID-19 Vaccination in Latino Communities
NCT06128928
My Life, My Healthcare
NCT03017196
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
NCT05880004
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Formative research with representatives of multiple levels of the Baltimore food environment (i.e., local wholesalers and retail food store owners) in order to select key foods for promotion, determine appropriate communication strategies (e.g., messages, channels, materials) for each level, and select the most appropriate pricing approach (i.e., performance based allowance structure and stipulations).
2. Pilot the multilevel program with three wholesalers and 24 food stores (6 control, 6 health communications only, 6 pricing only, 6 combined), and assess program implementation through detailed process evaluation.
3. Assess impact of the pilot program on a) the stocking, pricing, marketing, and sales volume of promoted foods at wholesale and retail levels, and b) food purchasing behaviors and associated psychosocial variables (i.e., self-efficacy, intentions, perceived cost) at the consumer level (final sample n=12 consumers/store, 288 total).
The proposed research seeks to develop effective, multilevel communication strategies to improve diet and reduce risk for diet-related chronic diseases. The study team anticipates this design will demonstrate the value of a multi-pronged and multilevel health communications approach to obesity and chronic disease prevention, and will lead to a large-scale trial and informed policies designed to improve food availability and affordability in low-income urban settings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Communications
These 6 stores received the communications intervention. Communications materials were developed for each program phase; 1) Healthier Drinks, 2) Healthier Essentials, and 3) Healthier Snacks. Each phase's materials included posters, recipe cards, educational handouts, shelf talkers, price tags, door signs, educational displays, and promotional giveaways (i.e., drink tumblers, re-usable shopping bags) to encourage healthy food purchasing and consumption. Stores receiving the communications intervention also received either a small refrigerator or freezer to help provide the environmental supports needed to stock perishable fruits and vegetables.
Communications
Communication materials were used to promote healthier items to consumers in corner stores.
Control
These 6 stores received no intervention.
No interventions assigned to this group
Pricing
These 6 stores received a pricing intervention. 10-30% with discounts for specific foods contingent on price elasticity of demand, initial wholesale price, and projected store-level sales. Items were given the minimum discount needed to increase store supply and consumer demand. For example, brand name frozen vegetables were discounted 30% at the wholesaler, in order to provide the storeowner with enough incentive to stock the item. The % discount passed from the storeowner to the consumer was ultimately a decision made by the storeowner, but was suggested to be at least 50% in order to increase consumer demand. Discounts were automatically applied at wholesaler registers to stores receiving the pricing intervention.
Pricing
The pricing incentives were used to help promote sales of healthier food items.
Combined (Communications & Pricing)
These 6 stores received communications materials as well as pricing incentives as intervention (see Communications \& Pricing Arms Descriptions).
Combined (Communications & Pricing)
Communications with Pricing incentives were used to promote the sale/consumption of healthier foods.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Communications
Communication materials were used to promote healthier items to consumers in corner stores.
Pricing
The pricing incentives were used to help promote sales of healthier food items.
Combined (Communications & Pricing)
Communications with Pricing incentives were used to promote the sale/consumption of healthier foods.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
21 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joel Gittelsohn
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Budd N, Cuccia A, Jeffries JK, Prasad D, Frick KD, Powell L, Katz FA, Gittelsohn J. B'More Healthy: Retail Rewards--design of a multi-level communications and pricing intervention to improve the food environment in Baltimore City. BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 24;15:283. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1616-6.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
website detailing ongoing projects to improve the food environment
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIH110547
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.