Disentangling the Role of Culture, Life Stage, and Information Design to Facilitate Equity in Data Report Back

NCT ID: NCT06729775

Last Updated: 2025-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1546 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-21

Study Completion Date

2028-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There remains a need for novel research that facilitates RBRR in a manner that raises data and environmental health literacy (D/EHL) and supports communities striving for environmental health and structural change. Rooted in bioethics and building upon trusted and established long-term partnerships and leveraging existing datasets, the project goal is to create and pilot a national model of report back that is centered in the margins and engages diverse rural and urban EJ communities to ensure that RBRR reaches all populations in a manner tailored to their individual needs, including culture, life stage, language, and design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this intervention study is to learn if the data report back design type can modify data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes in adolescence (10\~19 yrs.), young adults (18-26 yrs.) (110), and adults (27 yrs.+).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* How does design type: (1) graphical (control), art-infused (treatment 1) and geospatial (treatment 2) influence data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes related to numeracy and data literacy?
* How does design type: (1) graphical (control), art-infused (treatment 1) and geospatial (treatment 2) influence data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes related to knowledge and awareness related to environmental risks?
* How does design type: (1) graphical (control), art-infused (treatment 1) and geospatial (treatment 2) influence data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes related to skills and self-efficacy for environmental action?
* How does design type: (1) graphical (control), art-infused (treatment 1) and geospatial (treatment 2) influence data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes related to engaging in environmental health activities?
* \[primary hypothesis or outcome measure 1\]?
* \[primary hypothesis or outcome measure 2\]?

Researchers will compare outcomes related to life span and design type to see if the design type leads to difference data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes by life stage. During analysis, in addition to life stage, participants will also be analyzed by select sociodemographic variables, e.g., income, education, and race/ethnicity.

Participants will be asked to:

* Complete a pre-survey (baseline)
* Complete a post-survey
* Review their randomly assigned repot back design
* Participate in a focus group and answer questions about the design
* At minimum of six months later, participate in an interview

Summary statistics and qualitative summaries of findings will be generated and used to inform interpretation of inferential statistical tests comparing subgroups. Statistical analyses (i.e., Chi square tests, plus Cramér's V, Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and/or Mann-Whitney U tests) will be conducted to determine any significant differences related to (1) numeracy and data literacy, (2) knowledge and awareness related to environmental risks and (3) skills and self-efficacy for environmental action occur by data report back design type and sociodemographic variables.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Education, Health

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

adolescence - graphical

adolescence (10\~19 yrs.) that receives a traditional graphical (figures/charts/tables) representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

adolescence - art-infused

adolescence (10\~19 yrs.) that receives an environment art representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

adolescence - geospatial

adolescence (10\~19 yrs.) that receives a geospatial representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

young adults - graphical

young adults (18-26 yrs.) that receives a traditional graphical (figures/charts/tables) representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

young adults - art-infused

young adults (18-26 yrs.) that receives an environment art representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

young adults - geospatial

young adults (18-26 yrs.) that receives a a geospatial representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

adults - graphical

adults (27 yrs.+) that receives a traditional graphical (figures/charts/tables) representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

adults - art-infused

adults (27 yrs.+) that receives an environment art representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

adults - geospatial

adults (27 yrs.+) that receives a geospatial representation of environmental health/quality data

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Data report back preference by life span

Intervention Type OTHER

Data report back preference by life span.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Data report back preference by life span

Data report back preference by life span.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants should live in Pinal county, Arizona, Gila county, Arizona, and Cuyahoga county, Ohio.

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals living outside of the partnering counties will not be eligible for participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Arizona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Monica D Ramirez-Andreotta, PhD, Environmental Science

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arizona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Monica D Ramirez-Andreotta, PhD, Environmental Science

Role: CONTACT

520-621-0091

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01ES036236

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY00004829

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Telecare in Rural Senior Centers
NCT05552638 WITHDRAWN NA
CommunityRx-Cardiovascular Disease
NCT06264726 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA