Disentangling the Role of Culture, Life Stage, and Information Design to Facilitate Equity in Data Report Back
NCT ID: NCT06729775
Last Updated: 2025-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
1546 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-21
2028-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Report-Back Strategies for Long-term and Short-term Exposure Information in Rural Tribal Populations
NCT06593340
Evaluating the Impact of an Equity Focused Dashboard and Clinical Support
NCT05278806
Integrating Patient Generated Family Health History From Varied Electronic Health Record (EHR) Entry Portals
NCT00977847
Communicating Multiple Disease Risks: A Translation of Risk Prediction Science
NCT03255291
National Survey to Understand Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Communicating to the Public About Epigenetics
NCT07020234
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* How does design type: (1) graphical (control), art-infused (treatment 1) and geospatial (treatment 2) influence data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes related to numeracy and data literacy?
* How does design type: (1) graphical (control), art-infused (treatment 1) and geospatial (treatment 2) influence data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes related to knowledge and awareness related to environmental risks?
* How does design type: (1) graphical (control), art-infused (treatment 1) and geospatial (treatment 2) influence data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes related to skills and self-efficacy for environmental action?
* How does design type: (1) graphical (control), art-infused (treatment 1) and geospatial (treatment 2) influence data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes related to engaging in environmental health activities?
* \[primary hypothesis or outcome measure 1\]?
* \[primary hypothesis or outcome measure 2\]?
Researchers will compare outcomes related to life span and design type to see if the design type leads to difference data and environmental health literacy learning outcomes by life stage. During analysis, in addition to life stage, participants will also be analyzed by select sociodemographic variables, e.g., income, education, and race/ethnicity.
Participants will be asked to:
* Complete a pre-survey (baseline)
* Complete a post-survey
* Review their randomly assigned repot back design
* Participate in a focus group and answer questions about the design
* At minimum of six months later, participate in an interview
Summary statistics and qualitative summaries of findings will be generated and used to inform interpretation of inferential statistical tests comparing subgroups. Statistical analyses (i.e., Chi square tests, plus Cramér's V, Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and/or Mann-Whitney U tests) will be conducted to determine any significant differences related to (1) numeracy and data literacy, (2) knowledge and awareness related to environmental risks and (3) skills and self-efficacy for environmental action occur by data report back design type and sociodemographic variables.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
adolescence - graphical
adolescence (10\~19 yrs.) that receives a traditional graphical (figures/charts/tables) representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
adolescence - art-infused
adolescence (10\~19 yrs.) that receives an environment art representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
adolescence - geospatial
adolescence (10\~19 yrs.) that receives a geospatial representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
young adults - graphical
young adults (18-26 yrs.) that receives a traditional graphical (figures/charts/tables) representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
young adults - art-infused
young adults (18-26 yrs.) that receives an environment art representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
young adults - geospatial
young adults (18-26 yrs.) that receives a a geospatial representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
adults - graphical
adults (27 yrs.+) that receives a traditional graphical (figures/charts/tables) representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
adults - art-infused
adults (27 yrs.+) that receives an environment art representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
adults - geospatial
adults (27 yrs.+) that receives a geospatial representation of environmental health/quality data
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Data report back preference by life span
Data report back preference by life span.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
10 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
NIH
University of Arizona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Monica D Ramirez-Andreotta, PhD, Environmental Science
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Arizona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00004829
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.