eHealth Literacy Intervention for Spanish Speaking Older Adults in the US
NCT ID: NCT07220395
Last Updated: 2025-10-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-02-14
2028-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Health Insurance Literacy Among Utah's Hispanic Population
NCT04823975
Self-management, Health Literacy and Social Capital in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Older Adults
NCT02733523
Improving the Mobility of Transportation Disadvantaged Older Adults
NCT05812105
Promoting Equitable Access to Language Services in Health and Human Services
NCT06272110
Effectiveness of Health Literacy Enhancement Program Among Older Persons With Physical Multimorbidity
NCT06313138
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
C.2 Changes in Design. Previous versions of the intervention have been guided by the literature on older adults' learning of computer technology, and feature key elements designed specifically to accommodate older computer learners' needs and preferences. These include (1) providing step-by-step, detailed instructions and avoiding technical jargon, (2) providing hands-on practice and encouraging questions, (3) making sure each lesson builds on previous lessons and increases complexity gradually, (4) ensuring the learners experience at least some level of success at the initial stage of the training6, (5) conducting the training in a familiar, relaxed, and supportive environment, and (6) offering the training in the early morning hours, which is generally the optimal time of day for older learners. These elements remain key components of the intervention.
These changes have been made for two reasons. First, due to changes in people's way of living post-COVID (i.e., less in-person contact), in-person intervention delivery may not be acceptable as a delivery method for older adults who continue to be a vulnerable group as COVID shifts from a pandemic to an endemic. Additionally, interaction with healthcare systems is increasingly moving online. Thus, virtual learning with a live facilitator synchronously over Zoom may be a more acceptable approach. Second, the literature assessing interventions with Latino populations suggests the use of peer advisors (i.e., promotoras or Lay-health Advisors) has emerged as a potentially effective approach for improving access to care, health outcomes, and health behaviors. Wisniewski et al. proposed the importance of a new role in healthcare, in which peers assist others in navigating technology to take advantage of new tools that augment existing pathways to good health and healthcare. The emergence of the use of peer advisors (promotoras) is a natural progression for healthcare as the role of technology expands, so will the need to support its implementation. The next section describes the cultural adaptation process and further justifies the need of a peer advisor (promotora) in intervention work with Latino populations.
C.3 Cultural Adaptation. In addition to including promotoras and having the intervention materials translated into Spanish, cultural adaptation goes beyond language to focus on factors relevant to the Latino community. The literature provides practical steps for culturally adapting interventions for adult Latinos. Much of the literature in this area comes from one of the mentors on this proposal, as a pioneer in cultural adaption with Latino populations and internet-based interventions
Religion. Muñoz and Mendelson suggest incorporating religion, particularly Catholicism, often resonates with Latino participants who use religion as an important lens when making decisions. The use of relevant phrases or "dichos" to motivate and engage participants is another important part of cultural adaptation and this can be paired with incorporation of religion. For example, Latinos often use the phrase "si Dios quiere" ("what God wants"), which can guide their perception about control over aspects of their health. Subjects' beliefs can be used as a counter to what subjects perceive as barriers. For example, suggesting God brought this intervention into their lives and addressing the concept that God helps those who help themselves.
Family. Another factor that can be used for motivation in the intervention is emphasizing family or familismo. Familismo is an important part of health decision-making as close friends and family are often consulted before medical professionals. This can be used as a motivating factor by reinforcing that learning eHealth will help their family, such as suggesting that subjects will be able to share this knowledge (i.e., help their husband) or explaining how this could lead to good health to help them live longer and be around family longer.
Respect. It is important to select resources and strategies that provide a balance between one's culture of origin and the culture in which subjects now live. This helps establish respect of one's culture of origin and enhance self-efficacy by reducing the burden of learning all new resources and strategies from the dominant culture. Muñoz and Mendelson found that one way to help Latinos learn new strategies is to provide a peer facilitator that shares a familiar background and language. This also helps acknowledge lived experiences because a peer facilitator may allow participants to feel safe to discuss issues that affect how subjects interact with healthcare systems. Another strategy to consider is the use of formal titles with older adults as a sign of respect.
Latino Heterogeneity. A major consideration when working with Latino populations is that different Latino subgroups may respond differently as there is variability across these subgroups. For example, Mexican might use the term "listo" to mean 'ready' whereas El Salvadorans may use the term "aguja" to mean the same thing. Acknowledging not all Latinos share the same lived experiences is critical to respecting the variability within the U.S.-based Latino population. Assessing how Latinos from different subgroups respond to the adaptations will be important for future research. The PI will be intentional during recruitment to consider Latinos from various countries and experiences.
Throughout the adaptation process, the PI will receive feedback from mentors on the project and from a Community Advisory Board. The Community Advisory Board will comprise stakeholders from the partnerships mentioned in section
C.4 Assessing Feasibility and Acceptability of Culturally Adapted Intervention. The importance of conducting preliminary studies prior to implementation of interventions is well documented. It is important to define the purpose a feasibility and acceptability study to explain how this is not an efficacy study. The primary role of a feasibility study is to test all aspects of a research protocol and ensure the procedures work as desired. The study will be guided by the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework. RE-AIM provides a practical means of evaluating behavioral health change interventions. Using RE-AIM, the impact of innovations can be assessed at both the individual (i.e., end-user) and organizational (i.e., delivery agent) levels. The proposed work will answer questions in preparation for the implementation of a fully powered study, such as: How were participants recruited? Was recruitment successful? What percent of people contacted agreed to participate? What percent of people who agreed actually participated? Were all baseline participants retained for post assessments? Why was there dropout? What were the characteristics of those retained in the sample versus those lost (i.e., retention bias)? Were the investigators able to deliver the intervention? As intended (i.e., fidelity)? Did participants do what the team wanted? Did the subjects face problems in doing it? Were the investigators able to implement our measures pre and post? Were the scales the investigators employed shown to be reliable in this sample? With this information, a fully powered study with fewer problems will be implemented to test the efficacy. Questions related to whether the recruitment, intervention delivery, facilitators, activities, and outcome measures were acceptable will be asked to assess acceptability and satisfaction from participants. The proposed research is not assessing efficacy and will answer the questions above and more to assess feasibility and acceptability for a larger study. Table 3 provides examples of the primary objectives, based on the questions above and prior studies, and how those objectives will be measured. All mentors have successfully conducted feasibility studies to guide the PI during this work.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
eHealth Training Group
4-week, twice a week eHealth literacy training intervention
eHiLLs
Adapted intervention for Spanish speaking older adults.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
eHiLLs
Adapted intervention for Spanish speaking older adults.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Spanish is preferred language,
* are of Latino descent,
* are physically able to use computer or mobile device (i.e., tablet)
Exclusion Criteria
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
Baylor Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
025-417
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.