Disease Control in RRMS Transferring Treatment From Natalizumab to Fingolimod
NCT ID: NCT02277964
Last Updated: 2016-09-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-03-31
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Comparison of disease activity (clinical and MRI) during the year after change of therapy in comparison to the year before change
* Dynamic of onset of disease activity after having stopped treatment with natalizumab
* Change of immunological parameters during treatment change from natalizumab to fingolimod in comparison to clinical and MRI measures
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Disease Control and Safety in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Switching From Natalizumab to Fingolimod
NCT01499667
Study to Assess Immune Function and MRI Disease Activity in RRMS Patients When Switching From Natalizumab to Gilenya
NCT02325440
Impact of Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Participants
NCT02342704
Fingolimod Versus Dimethyl-fumarate in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT03345940
Long-term Effect of Fingolimod on Circulating Immunocompetent Mononuclear Cells in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT01755871
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study prospectively evaluates how safe it is to switch patients from natalizumab to fingolimod treatment following cessation of natalizumab treatment, in a cohort of RRMS patients.
Safety of the proposed transition paradigms is defined as both traditional safety measures but also recurrence of disease activity during a washout period of 8 weeks after the cessation of natalizumab treatment followed by fingolimod treatment initiation. An interim analysis of the first 15 patients revealed a clinical and MRI activity in 38.5 and 64.3% respectively. Therefore a shorter interval was defined for any subject entering into this study after october 2013: the interval was defined to be 4 weeks for those patients.
Overall, the study aims to provide guidance to physicians on the management of natalizumab-treated patients for whom a transition to fingolimod treatment is considered an appropriate treatment alternative.
An evidence based rationale for changing to a 4 or 8 week wash out period is not possible due to missing evidence. Due to the known risk of PML for patients being treated with natalizumab for more than 2 years, starting fingolimod during natalizumab therapy seems to be inappropriate, as an elevated risk for JC Virus (JCV) manifestation could be expected in this constellation. On the other hand considerable shortening of the 8-weeks interval could be favorable to prevent clinical and MRI activity. An interval of 4 weeks between last dose of natalizumab and first dose of fingolimod seemed to be an appropriate compromise to balance risks and benefits of this treatment transition.
Fingolimod and Natalizumab are influencing the immune system in completely different ways. It is therefore highly interesting not only to monitor clinical disease activity and MRI activity, but also to study immunological responses during the switching phase of both drugs.
The change of therapy from natalizumab to fingolimod poses possible risks. On the one hand MS could reactivate if the start of fingolimod is delayed too long, on the other hand infectious problems could emerge if fingolimod is started early and the patient is treated with two concomitant immunomodulators. Analyzing the immune response during the critical Switch period may help to identify markers that predict recrudescence of disease activity or a severe suppression of the immune response. It is known that natalizumab can block migration of lymphocytes via endothelial cells by interaction with integrins. More recently, it has been described that natalizumab influences also gene expression profiles in lymphocytes and that the blockade of migration over endothelial cells might not be as constant as the clinical effect predicts.
In contrast to natalizumab, fingolimod blocks egress of lymphocytes from secondary lymphoid organs (SLO) such as lymph nodes. This effect is mediated by functional antagonization sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors on lymphocytes by fingolimod. Due to a different expression of lymph node homing receptors naïve and central memory T-cells regularly circulate to SLO and are consequently more prone to sequestration to SLO than effector memory cells that do not circulate to SLO on a regular basis. This is reflected by a decrease of naïve and central memory cells and a relative increase of effector memory cells in peripheral blood of fingolimod treated patients. So far, the effect of a concomitant treatment of natalizumab and fingolimod on the immune system has not been studied.
The different aspects of immune modulation of both drugs will be studied. At baseline and then at early follow-up visit (8, 12, 16, 20 weeks) we aim to:
* assess alterations of the composition of myeloid cells and lymphocyte subpopulations (i.e. naïve, central memory and effector memory and regulatory T cells, B cells) and adhesion molecule expression in peripheral blood
* measure autoantigen specific T cell proliferation and Interferon gamma (IFNγ) production
* characterize transcriptomics alterations (including messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and small non-coding RNA expression) in lymphocytes of MS-patients
* assess changes in plasma cytokine, chemokine, and Matrix metalloproteinase levels
* assess the migratory capacity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)
For the patients being recruited after october 2013 with a shorter wash out period, the neuroimmunological analysis has been omitted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RRMS with treatment change
All patients with treatment change from natalizumab 300mg iv monthly to fingolimod 0.5mg orally/daily.
16 patients were switched with an interval of 8 weeks until october 2013. After an interims analysis the interval has been changed to 4 weeks (after october 2013).
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects with RRMS, defined by 2010 revised McDonald criteria
* Patients with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-6.0 inclusive
* Patients on treatment with natalizumab for at least 6 months prior to screening
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients receiving class Ia or III antiarrhythmic drugs
* Patients with proven history of sick sinus Syndrome (SSS) or sinoatrial (SA) heart block
* Patients with uncontrolled hypertension
* Patients with resting heart rate (HR) \<45 bpm
* Patients who have been treated with Fingolimod or cladribine at any time
* Patients with a history of malignancy of any organ system
* Patients with severe respiratory or hepatic disease
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis
INDUSTRY
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ludwig Kappos, Prof., MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
Basel, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CFTY720D2324
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.