Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Postoperative Pain: a Linical Trial in Humans

NCT ID: NCT02273999

Last Updated: 2018-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized clinical trial was designed to assess the clinical efficacy of Pulsed electromagnetic field PEMF delivered with a wearable device in terms of postoperative pain and quality of healing after mandibular third molar extraction.

The sample included 120 patients undergoing unilateral mandibular third molar extraction. The devices were positioned over the area corresponding to the extraction site and wearers were asked to keep them in place for 7 days. All patients were asked to record pain (on a visual analog scale \[VAS\]), hours of wearing the device (groups T and P), and any use of analgesics. At 7 days, healing complications (dehiscence, tumefaction, pus, local lymphadenopathy, pain on palpation, postoperative bleeding, alveolitis) were recorded blindly.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy is a noninvasive method for delivering pulsed radiofrequency energy to tissues to treat postoperative pain and edema. This randomized clinical trial was designed to assess the clinical efficacy of PEMF delivered with a wearable device in terms of postoperative pain and quality of healing after mandibular third molar extraction.

Materials and methods: The sample included 120 patients undergoing unilateral mandibular third molar extraction. At the end of the surgical procedure, patients were randomly assigned to a test (T) or placebo (P) group and fitted with enabled or disabled PEMF devices, respectively, or to a control (C) group not fitted with a PEMF device. The devices were positioned over the area corresponding to the extraction site and wearers were asked to keep them in place for 7 days. All patients were asked to record pain (on a visual analog scale \[VAS\]), hours of wearing the device (groups T and P), and any use of analgesics. At 7 days, healing complications (dehiscence, tumefaction, pus, local lymphadenopathy, pain on palpation, postoperative bleeding, alveolitis) were recorded blindly.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Oral Surgery Third Molar Extraction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group (no device)

No devices were delivered after third molar tooth extraction

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Placebo group (Inactivated device)

Inactivated devices were delivered after third molar tooth extraction

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

RecoveryRx™

Intervention Type DEVICE

Appliance of the device after surgery

Test (activated device)

Activated devices were delivered after third molar tooth extraction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RecoveryRx™

Intervention Type DEVICE

Appliance of the device after surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RecoveryRx™

Appliance of the device after surgery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pulsed electromagnetic fields

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who needs third molar extraction,
* good oral hygiene,
* no contraindications to treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* age under 14 years;
* poor oral hygiene (plaque index less then 20%);
* contraindications for surgery (or anesthesia);
* infectious or systemic diseases;
* immunosuppressant therapy;
* pregnancy or breastfeeding;
* mental disorders.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Padova, School of Dental Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefano Sivolella

Clinical Faculty department of oral surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2976P

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Jaw Muscle Pain Post Wisdom Molar Surgery
NCT07094542 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
Lidocaine Patch and Lower Third Molar
NCT07330726 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3