Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-30
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety Study of the Misoprostol Vaginal Priming Insert (MVPI) Prior to Hysteroscopy
NCT00925938
Oral Misoprostol Before Endometrial Biopsy
NCT00200226
Comparing Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostal for Cervical Priming in Hysteroscopy
NCT03638856
Hysteroscopy and Misoprostol Project
NCT00363389
Misoprostol For Nulliparous Women Before Hysteroscopy
NCT01156948
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Misoprostol administration - buccal then vaginal
Vaginal or buccal administration
Misoprostol - buccal
buccal administration
Misoprostol - vaginal
vaginal administration
Misoprostol administration - vaginal then buccal
Vaginal or buccal administration
Misoprostol - buccal
buccal administration
Misoprostol - vaginal
vaginal administration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Misoprostol - buccal
buccal administration
Misoprostol - vaginal
vaginal administration
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Negative result of urine pregnancy test at screening and prior to each administration of study drug
* Normal, regularly occurring menses (being 25-35 day cycles)
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin within two weeks prior to enrollment or planned use of these medications during the study period
* Allergy to prostaglandins
* Previous cervical cancer
* Partial or complete cervical excision
* Previous hysterectomy
* Immunosuppression: either pharmacological or due to comorbidities
* Diabetes mellitus
* Auto-immune disease
* History of lymphoma or leukemia
* Sexually transmitted infection (by self-report) over previous 1 year
* Bacterial Vaginosis or Candidiasis (current or past 3 months)
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gynuity Health Projects
OTHER
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Aronoff
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David M. Aronoff, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moran M, Mozes MF, Maddux MS, Veremis S, Bartkus C, Ketel B, Pollak R, Wallemark C, Jonasson O. Prevention of acute graft rejection by the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol in renal-transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine and prednisone. N Engl J Med. 1990 Apr 26;322(17):1183-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199004263221703.
Pouteil-Noble C, Chapuis F, Berra N, Hadj-Aissa A, Lacavalerie B, Lefrancois N, Martin X, Touraine JL. Misoprostol in renal transplant recipients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study on the prevention of acute rejection episodes and cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(5):552-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/9.5.552.
Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;90(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00111-7.
Waiser J, Bohler T, Stoll J, Schumann B, Budde K, Neumayer HH. The immunosuppressive potential of misoprostol--efficacy and variability. Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;109(3):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2003.08.009.
Middleton T, Schaff E, Fielding SL, Scahill M, Shannon C, Westheimer E, Wilkinson T, Winikoff B. Randomized trial of mifepristone and buccal or vaginal misoprostol for abortion through 56 days of last menstrual period. Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.017. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
Tang OS, Ho PC. The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion. Contraception. 2006 Jul;74(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.005. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
el-Refaey H, Rajasekar D, Abdalla M, Calder L, Templeton A. Induction of abortion with mifepristone (RU 486) and oral or vaginal misoprostol. N Engl J Med. 1995 Apr 13;332(15):983-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504133321502.
Ho PC, Ngai SW, Liu KL, Wong GC, Lee SW. Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):735-8. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00419-5.
Silverstein FE, Graham DY, Senior JR, Davies HW, Struthers BJ, Bittman RM, Geis GS. Misoprostol reduces serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Aug 15;123(4):241-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-4-199508150-00001.
Herting RL, Clay GA. Overview of clinical safety with misoprostol. Dig Dis Sci. 1985 Nov;30(11 Suppl):185S-193S. doi: 10.1007/BF01309407.
Wildeman RA. Focus on misoprostol: review of worldwide safety data. Clin Invest Med. 1987 May;10(3):243-5.
Rostom A, Dube C, Wells G, Tugwell P, Welch V, Jolicoeur E, McGowan J. Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(4):CD002296. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002296.
Chong E, Tsereteli T, Nguyen NN, Winikoff B. A randomized controlled trial of different buccal misoprostol doses in mifepristone medical abortion. Contraception. 2012 Sep;86(3):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.12.012. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
Raymond EG, Shannon C, Weaver MA, Winikoff B. First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013 Jan;87(1):26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
Kotsonis FN, Dodd DC, Regnier B, Kohn FE. Preclinical toxicology profile of misoprostol. Dig Dis Sci. 1985 Nov;30(11 Suppl):142S-146S. doi: 10.1007/BF01309401.
Zane S, Guarner J. Gynecologic clostridial toxic shock in women of reproductive age. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011 Dec;13(6):561-70. doi: 10.1007/s11908-011-0207-7.
Fjerstad M, Trussell J, Sivin I, Lichtenberg ES, Cullins V. Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 9;361(2):145-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809146.
Hemmerling A. The safety of misoprostol. ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD; 2006.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
140667
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.