Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Standard Surgical Care for the Treatment of Incomplete Abortion

NCT ID: NCT00466999

Last Updated: 2012-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2009-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, we will compare the safety and efficacy of 400 mcg sublingually administered misoprostol alone to standard surgical care for the treatment of incomplete abortion. This study will provide important data on the role of misoprostol in health services offering an array of treatments for incomplete abortion. Women could significantly benefit from a non-invasive treatment option for incomplete abortion. While safe surgical services are becoming more widespread, there is still a serious risk of complications from these procedures. Especially in developing countries, infection, hemorrhage and uterine damage are still too common. Medical treatment of incomplete abortion using misoprostol would be a tremendous step to reducing morbidity and mortality due to abortion complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Incomplete Abortion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

surgery

standard surgical treatment (either dilation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

standard surgical treatment (dilation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration)

misoprostol

400 mcg misoprostol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

single dose of 400 mcg misoprostol administered sublingually

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

misoprostol

single dose of 400 mcg misoprostol administered sublingually

Intervention Type DRUG

surgery

standard surgical treatment (dilation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Uterine size no larger than 12 weeks LMP at time of presentation for care.
* Past or present history of vaginal bleeding during pregnancy.
* Open cervical os.
* If ultrasound used evidence of incomplete abortion with substantial debris in the uterus.
* All women would have been advised to have surgical evacuation of the uterus if misoprostol was not available.
* General good health.
* Willing to provide contact information for purposes of follow-up.
* Also in Egypt: 21 years of age or over or parental permission (there is no minimum age requirement in Niger, Mauritania and Senegal).

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications to study drug
* Signs of severe infection, defined as at least one of the following: 1) foul smelling discharge, 2) fever \> 38 degrees C , 3) uterine tenderness
* Hemodynamic disturbances (pulse \>110/min and systolic bp \<100)
* Have an IUD in place; (the IUD may be removed making the woman eligible)
* Suspected ectopic pregnancy
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gynuity Health Projects

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Beverly Winikoff, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gynuity Health Projects

Rasha Dabash, MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gynuity Health Projects

Ayisha Diop, MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gynuity Health Projects

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dandé District Hospital/Ziniaré District Hospital

Dande/Ziniare, , Burkina Faso

Site Status

El-Galaa Teaching Hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Shatby Maternity Hospital/Alexandria University

Shatby, Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Cheikh Zayed Hospital

Nouakchott, , Mauritania

Site Status

Maternite Issaka Gazobi

Niamey, , Niger

Site Status

Centre de Sante Le Roi Baudouin

Guédiawaye, , Senegal

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Burkina Faso Egypt Mauritania Niger Senegal

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ghosh J, Papadopoulou A, Devall AJ, Jeffery HC, Beeson LE, Do V, Price MJ, Tobias A, Tuncalp O, Lavelanet A, Gulmezoglu AM, Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34061352 (View on PubMed)

Shochet T, Diop A, Gaye A, Nayama M, Sall AB, Bukola F, Blandine T, Abiola OM, Dao B, Olayinka O, Winikoff B. Sublingual misoprostol versus standard surgical care for treatment of incomplete abortion in five sub-Saharan African countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Nov 14;12:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-127.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23150927 (View on PubMed)

Blandine T, Ouattara AZ, Coral A, Hassane C, Clotaire H, Dao B, Lankoande J, Diop A, Blum J. Sublingual [corrected] misoprostol as first-line care for incomplete abortion in Burkina Faso. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;119(2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.05.036. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22935621 (View on PubMed)

Dabash R, Ramadan MC, Darwish E, Hassanein N, Blum J, Winikoff B. A randomized controlled trial of 400-mug sublingual misoprostol versus manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of incomplete abortion in two Egyptian hospitals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Nov;111(2):131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20801444 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2.2.2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Misoprostol for Non-Viable Pregnancies
NCT00426491 COMPLETED PHASE3