Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate

NCT ID: NCT02258061

Last Updated: 2014-10-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The optimal pacing rate during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not known. Investigators investigate the impact of changing basal pacing frequencies on autonomic nerve function, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and self-perceived quality of life (QoL).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a double-blinded randomized crossover pilot study testing two basal pacing rates: DDD-60 versus DDD-80. Each patient is paced for 2 periods of 90 days with DDD-60 and DDD-80 in a randomly sequence.

Blood samples NT-proBNP plasma levels are analysed at baseline and at the end of each phase using electrochemiluminescence-immunoassay. Patients rest for 15 minutes before the samples are taken.

These result are monitored by supervisory group to ensure that increase of more than 15% than baseline values result in termination of study.

Investigators conduct two distinct questionnaires (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (LIfHE) questionnaire and Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36)) A symptom limiting bicycle (Ergoline, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) exercise test is performed to measure maximum work capacity and oxygen consumption at each phase.

Recordings of resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) are sought in all patients at both rates of pacing. All patients are studied on the same set-up in the semi-recumbent position after 30 minutes of rest. Tungsten microelectrodes (Iowa Bioengineering) are inserted into the common peroneal nerve just below the knee.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Heart Failure Bi-ventricular Pacing Sympathetic Activity Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DDD-80 pacing

To investigate the impact of basal pacing rates of 80-bpm (DDD-80) in CRT patients on: (i) autonomic nerve function; assessed by micro-neurography, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and (ii) peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) and (iii) self-perceived quality of life (QoL).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DDD-80

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Basal pacing rate set to 80-bpm. Note:Patients have already pacemaker implanted before this study.

DDD-60 pacing

To investigate the impact of basal pacing rates of 60-bpm (DDD-60) in CRT patients on: (i) autonomic nerve function; assessed by micro-neurography, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and (ii) peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) self-perceived quality of life (QoL).

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

DDD-60

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Basal pacing rate set to 60-bpm. Note:Patients have already pacemaker implanted before this study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DDD-80

Basal pacing rate set to 80-bpm. Note:Patients have already pacemaker implanted before this study.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

DDD-60

Basal pacing rate set to 60-bpm. Note:Patients have already pacemaker implanted before this study.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
* CRT device implanted (with initial indication in accordance with European guidelines) at least 6 months prior to inclusion.
* New York Heart Association functional (NYHA) class II-IV
* Sinus rhythm,
* Hemodynamically stable
* Biventricular pacing \> 90% of the time
* On optimal medical treatment for heart failure with no changes in medications during the past 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

* NYHA I
* unable to perform exercise test (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe arthritis)
* cancer
* plasma creatinine \> 200 micromole per litre
* an admission for decompensated HF or acute coronary syndrome in the preceding 3 months.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Adam Ali Ghotbi

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adam A Ghotbi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rigshospitalet, University hospital of Copenhagen

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kuniyoshi RR, Martinelli M, Negrao CE, Siqueira SF, Rondon MU, Trombetta IC, Kuniyoshi FH, Laterza MC, Nishioka SA, Costa R, Tamaki WT, Crevelari ES, Peixoto Gde L, Ramires JA, Kalil R. Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Jan;37(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12254. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23952584 (View on PubMed)

Agostoni P, Corra U, Cattadori G, Veglia F, Battaia E, La Gioia R, Scardovi AB, Emdin M, Metra M, Sinagra G, Limongelli G, Raimondo R, Re F, Guazzi M, Belardinelli R, Parati G, Magri D, Fiorentini C, Cicoira M, Salvioni E, Giovannardi M, Mezzani A, Scrutinio D, Di Lenarda A, Mantegazza V, Ricci R, Apostolo A, Iorio A, Paolillo S, Palermo P, Contini M, Vassanelli C, Passino C, Piepoli MF; MECKI Score Research Group. Prognostic value of indeterminable anaerobic threshold in heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):977-87. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000471. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23881847 (View on PubMed)

Stockburger M, de Teresa E, Lamas G, Desaga M, Koenig C, Habedank D, Cobo E, Navarro X, Wiegand U. Exercise capacity and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels with biventricular vs. right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block: results from the PREVENT-HF German Substudy. Europace. 2014 Jan;16(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut217. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23861381 (View on PubMed)

Brenyo A, Barsheshet A, Rao M, Huang DT, Zareba W, McNitt S, Hall WJ, Peterson DR, Solomon SD, Moss AJ, Goldenberg I. Brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):998-1004. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000174. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23801020 (View on PubMed)

Shukla A, Curtis AB, Mehra MR, Albert NM, Gheorghiade M, Heywood JT, Liu Y, O'Connor CM, Reynolds D, Walsh MN, Yancy CW, Fonarow GC. Factors associated with improvement in utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in eligible heart failure patients: findings from IMPROVE HF. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;36(4):433-43. doi: 10.1111/pace.12090. Epub 2013 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23380000 (View on PubMed)

Martin DO, Day JD, Lai PY, Murphy AL, Nayak HM, Villareal RP, Weiner S, Kraus SM, Stolen KQ, Gold MR. Atrial support pacing in heart failure: results from the multicenter PEGASUS CRT trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec;23(12):1317-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02402.x. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22830441 (View on PubMed)

Ghotbi AA, Sander M, Kober L, Philbert BT, Gustafsson F, Hagemann C, Kjaer A, Jacobsen PK. Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate in Non-Ischemic Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0138124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138124. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26382243 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-3-2011-034

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cardiac Resynchronisation Study
NCT01213537 COMPLETED