'Effect of CRT on Defibrillation Threshold Estimates' Study

NCT ID: NCT00626093

Last Updated: 2019-02-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

77 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) estimates in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) patients. The hypothesis of the study is that defibrillation threshold (DFT) will decrease with 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic addition in patients with drug refractory heart failure (HF). Along with providing relief of symptoms of HF, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) are used for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although there are concerns that the defibrillation threshold (DFT) estimates are elevated in the heart failure (HF) patient population due to lower LV ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, there is paucity of data available to evaluate this theory.

Recently, two different studies in a retrospective manner evaluated the energy requirements in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). Burke et al analyzed DFTs in 50 patients each implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Although the ejection fraction (EF) in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT- D) group was lower than the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) group, the mean defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) between the two groups were not significantly different (10.2 ± 6.1 J for the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) group vs. 9.5 ± 5.0 J for the control group)14. In the ASSURE study, Doshi et al. showed that patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) devices do not have higher energy requirements when compared to patients receiving modern single or dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Although, there was a trend toward higher energy requirements found among patients with higher degrees of heart failure.

Major cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials have showed that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) therapy has positive effects on ejection fraction (EF) and the heart failure (HF) condition of the patient over time. But, there is no study that has evaluated the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in the heart failure (HF) patients over time of receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This information will help the clinicians decide if they need to perform more invasive procedures during device implant to lower DFTs in patients who do not meet the defibrillation safety margin or they should just wait over time for the CRT to reduce the defibrillation threshold (DFT). Also, there is no published data about the stability of defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in heart failure (HF) patients over time. The results from this study will also help to clarify whether it is safe to never test the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) post-implant in this patient population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sudden Cardiac Death

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D)

Patients in the study who received a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) are indicated for it. It's a single arm study in which patients underwent defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at implant and 6 months.

Group Type OTHER

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D)

Intervention Type DEVICE

* Patients in the study who receive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) are indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT).
* Patient undergoes Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at implant and at 6 months. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing will include 3 ventricular fibrillation (VF) inductions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D)

* Patients in the study who receive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) are indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT).
* Patient undergoes Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at implant and at 6 months. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing will include 3 ventricular fibrillation (VF) inductions.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Epic HF,Atlas+ HF,Epic II HF,Atlas II HF,Promote CRT-D

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient meets standard indications for a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D).
* Patient will be implanted with an FDA approved St Jude Medical (SJM) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) and compatible defibrillation lead system.
* Patient is able to tolerate defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing.
* Patient is geographically stable and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule.
* Patient has a life expectancy of greater than 6 months from the time of implant.
* Patient has stable heart failure (HF) medications at least one month prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to successfully implant an intravascular lead Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) device. (i.e. exclude epicardial leads).
* Patient is getting his Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) device replaced.
* Inability to successfully obtain the defibrillation threshold (DFT) at implant.
* Currently participating in a clinical trial that includes an active treatment arm or another data collection registry.
* Recent (within 24 hours) administration of Nesiritide™.
* Patient is on amiodarone (other antiarrhythmic agents known to affect defibrillation thresholds - DFTs) at the time of enrollment.
* Patient is pregnant.
* Patient is less than 18 years old.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amir Hedayati, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Glendale Heart Institute

Michael Gold, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of South Carolina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pacific Heart Institute

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Penrose Hospital

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gold MR, Hedayati A, Alaeddini J, Payne JP, Bailin S, Sturdivant JJ, Pradhan S, Oza AL. Temporal stability of defibrillation thresholds with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jul;8(7):1008-13. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21315841 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRD 388

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CRTd Responders Optimization
NCT04547244 COMPLETED