'Effect of CRT on Defibrillation Threshold Estimates' Study
NCT ID: NCT00626093
Last Updated: 2019-02-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
77 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2010-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Based Heart Failure Monitoring Study
NCT00632372
Ensure Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Study
NCT00291564
Resynchronization/Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial
NCT00251251
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator Based Impedance Monitoring Study
NCT00500838
Risk Stratification and Benefits With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
NCT00996086
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recently, two different studies in a retrospective manner evaluated the energy requirements in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). Burke et al analyzed DFTs in 50 patients each implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) device and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Although the ejection fraction (EF) in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT- D) group was lower than the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) group, the mean defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) between the two groups were not significantly different (10.2 ± 6.1 J for the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) group vs. 9.5 ± 5.0 J for the control group)14. In the ASSURE study, Doshi et al. showed that patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) devices do not have higher energy requirements when compared to patients receiving modern single or dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Although, there was a trend toward higher energy requirements found among patients with higher degrees of heart failure.
Major cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials have showed that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) therapy has positive effects on ejection fraction (EF) and the heart failure (HF) condition of the patient over time. But, there is no study that has evaluated the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in the heart failure (HF) patients over time of receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This information will help the clinicians decide if they need to perform more invasive procedures during device implant to lower DFTs in patients who do not meet the defibrillation safety margin or they should just wait over time for the CRT to reduce the defibrillation threshold (DFT). Also, there is no published data about the stability of defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) in heart failure (HF) patients over time. The results from this study will also help to clarify whether it is safe to never test the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) post-implant in this patient population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D)
Patients in the study who received a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) are indicated for it. It's a single arm study in which patients underwent defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at implant and 6 months.
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D)
* Patients in the study who receive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) are indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT).
* Patient undergoes Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at implant and at 6 months. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing will include 3 ventricular fibrillation (VF) inductions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D)
* Patients in the study who receive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) are indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT).
* Patient undergoes Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at implant and at 6 months. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing will include 3 ventricular fibrillation (VF) inductions.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient will be implanted with an FDA approved St Jude Medical (SJM) Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) and compatible defibrillation lead system.
* Patient is able to tolerate defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing.
* Patient is geographically stable and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule.
* Patient has a life expectancy of greater than 6 months from the time of implant.
* Patient has stable heart failure (HF) medications at least one month prior to enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient is getting his Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Defibrillator (CRT-D) device replaced.
* Inability to successfully obtain the defibrillation threshold (DFT) at implant.
* Currently participating in a clinical trial that includes an active treatment arm or another data collection registry.
* Recent (within 24 hours) administration of Nesiritide™.
* Patient is on amiodarone (other antiarrhythmic agents known to affect defibrillation thresholds - DFTs) at the time of enrollment.
* Patient is pregnant.
* Patient is less than 18 years old.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amir Hedayati, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Glendale Heart Institute
Michael Gold, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of South Carolina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pacific Heart Institute
Santa Monica, California, United States
Penrose Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gold MR, Hedayati A, Alaeddini J, Payne JP, Bailin S, Sturdivant JJ, Pradhan S, Oza AL. Temporal stability of defibrillation thresholds with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jul;8(7):1008-13. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRD 388
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.