Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Palatal Wound Healing
NCT ID: NCT02239042
Last Updated: 2014-09-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-10-31
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Different Low-level Laser Intensity Protocols on the Healing of Palatal Wounds
NCT02580357
Low-level Laser Therapy in Enhancing Wound Healing and Preserving Tissue Thickness
NCT02865902
Photobiomodulation of Palatal Donor Site After Free Gingival Graft Removal
NCT03000426
Low-intensity Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT02118155
L-PRF Versus A-PRF on Palatal Wound Healing
NCT06242314
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The selected patients were randomly allocated (by a computer generated list) into:
* Group 1 (Test, n=16): Periodontal surgery for root coverage through connective tissue graft and LLLT on donor site.
* Group 2 (Control, n=16): Periodontal surgery for root coverage through connective tissue graft and LLLT SHAM on donor site.
Surgical procedure was performed by one surgeon. The gingival recession defects were treated by connective tissue graft technique. A connective tissue graft was removed from palate mucosa following Bruno technique. Briefly, a first incision on the palate was performed perpendicularly to the long axis of the teeth, 2 to 3 mm apical to the gingival margin. The mesiodistal length of the incision was determined by the length of the graft required to cover the recession. Since the selected recessions were in maxillary canines and premolars, the length of the graft vary minimally (10-12mm). The second incision was made parallel to the first one, 1-2mm apically, and parallel to the long axis of the teeth in order to separate the subepithelium connective tissue from the epithelial layer. The incision is carried far enough apically to provide a 7mm height of connective tissue to cover the denuded root surface. Afterwards, another incision parallel to the long axis of the teeth, starting from the first incision was performed to separate the subepithelium connective tissue from the periosteum. Then, the connective tissue graft was removed from the palate as atraumatically as possible. Single sutures were made on the palate (4-0 silk) and the graft was sutured on the receptor site
Clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and 7, 14, 45, 60 and 90 days post-operatively
Statistical Analysis The null hypothesis considered in the study was the absence of difference in the clinical parameters between the different groups. For data analysis, the statistical program was used. The demographic and clinical data were compared between the groups using Student's t-test. The data were first analyzed for homogeneity using the Shapiro-Wilk test, which indicated non-normal distribution. . Those presenting Shapiro-Wilk p values \< 0.05 were analyzed using a Friedman test (for intragroup comparisons) and Mann-Whitney tests (for intergroup comparisons). For remaining wound area, tissue colorimetry, tissue thickness, and post-operative discomfort parameter analysis, Two Way Repeated Measures ANOVA was performed for intra and intergroup analysis. T-test was used for intergroup comparison of number of analgesics taken. Presence or absence of scar was measured by Q-square test. For all tests significance level of 5% was used.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) Sham
LLLT Sham on the palatal donor site of connective tissue graft
LLLT
The patients allocated for the test group received the following protocol for laser application: Five (5) points of irradiation were performed. The irradiation was performed with a ASGaAl diode laser that continuously emitted a wavelength of 660 nm. 30 mW was used for 20 seconds, and the total applied energy density (fluence) was 15 J/cm2 (3 J/cm2 per point and an application time of 4 seconds per point). The applications were performed using punctual contact (to reduce reflection) with the tip perpendicular to the gingival tissue. Laser therapy was initiated in the immediate postoperative period (just after sutures) and was followed by seven more applications performed every other day, with a total of 8 laser applications. The power of the equipment was calibrated prior to each application. The patients allocated to the control group received sham irradiation. For this, black rubber protection was placed at the tip of the laser device, which did not allow the light to reach the tissue
Low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
LLLT on the palatal donor site of connective tissue graft
LLLT
The patients allocated for the test group received the following protocol for laser application: Five (5) points of irradiation were performed. The irradiation was performed with a ASGaAl diode laser that continuously emitted a wavelength of 660 nm. 30 mW was used for 20 seconds, and the total applied energy density (fluence) was 15 J/cm2 (3 J/cm2 per point and an application time of 4 seconds per point). The applications were performed using punctual contact (to reduce reflection) with the tip perpendicular to the gingival tissue. Laser therapy was initiated in the immediate postoperative period (just after sutures) and was followed by seven more applications performed every other day, with a total of 8 laser applications. The power of the equipment was calibrated prior to each application. The patients allocated to the control group received sham irradiation. For this, black rubber protection was placed at the tip of the laser device, which did not allow the light to reach the tissue
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LLLT
The patients allocated for the test group received the following protocol for laser application: Five (5) points of irradiation were performed. The irradiation was performed with a ASGaAl diode laser that continuously emitted a wavelength of 660 nm. 30 mW was used for 20 seconds, and the total applied energy density (fluence) was 15 J/cm2 (3 J/cm2 per point and an application time of 4 seconds per point). The applications were performed using punctual contact (to reduce reflection) with the tip perpendicular to the gingival tissue. Laser therapy was initiated in the immediate postoperative period (just after sutures) and was followed by seven more applications performed every other day, with a total of 8 laser applications. The power of the equipment was calibrated prior to each application. The patients allocated to the control group received sham irradiation. For this, black rubber protection was placed at the tip of the laser device, which did not allow the light to reach the tissue
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UPECLIN HC FM Botucatu Unesp
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mauro Pedrine Santamaria
Researcher - Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mauro Santamaria, DDS, Ms, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
FOSJC-UNESP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fosjc-Unesp
São Jose Dos Campos/ SP, Non-US Resident, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dias SB, Fonseca MV, Dos Santos NC, Mathias IF, Martinho FC, Junior MS, Jardini MA, Santamaria MP. Effect of GaAIAs low-level laser therapy on the healing of human palate mucosa after connective tissue graft harvesting: randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(6):1695-702. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1685-2. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
132.831
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.