Comparison of Two Different Low-level Laser Intensity Protocols on the Healing of Palatal Wounds
NCT ID: NCT02580357
Last Updated: 2017-05-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-02-28
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Palatal Wound Healing
NCT02239042
Photobiomodulation of Palatal Donor Site After Free Gingival Graft Removal
NCT03000426
Low Intensity Laser Therapy in Connective Tissue Graft for Root Coverage in Smokers
NCT02995070
Effect of GaAlAs 940 Laser on Pain and Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft
NCT07308912
Evalution of the Effects of PRP and LLLT on Postoperative Complications and Wound Healing After Impacted Third Molar
NCT06836570
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients were assigned to one of the three treatment groups:
* Group 60 (Test, n=18): Periodontal surgery for root coverage through connective tissue graft and LLLT application on donor site using a 60 J/cm² dose.
* Group 30 (Test, n=18): Periodontal surgery for root coverage through connective tissue graft and LLLT application on donor site using a 30 J/cm² dose.
* Group Sham (Control, n= 18): Periodontal surgery for root coverage through connective tissue graft and LLLT SHAM on donor site.
All surgeries were performed by the same expert periodontist (MPS). Before the surgical procedure, all patients were enlightened about the causes and consequences of gingival recession and prevention techniques. Factors related to the origin of gingival recession, such as toothbrush trauma and inflammation caused by biofilm, were controlled through instruction on standardized brushing technique to avoid the influence of other hygiene methods capable of promoting trauma on soft tissues. Standardized dental floss and toothbrushes were given to patients. The surgical technique adopted in the recession defects was the trapezoidal-type of CAF and the connective tissue graft was removed from palate mucosa . Briefly, a first incision on the palate was performed perpendicularly to the long axis of the teeth, 2 to 3 mm apical to the gingival margin. The mesial-distal length of the incision was determined by the length of the graft required to cover the recession. Because the selected recessions were in maxillary canines and premolars, the lengths of the graft varied minimally (10-12mm). The second incision was made parallel to the first one (1-2 mm apically and parallel to the long axis of the teeth) to separate the subepithelium connective tissue from the epithelial layer. The incision is carried far enough apically to provide a 7- mm height of connective tissue to cover the denuded root surface. Afterward, another incision parallel to the long axis of the teeth starting from the first incision was performed to separate the subepithelium connective tissue from the periosteum. Then, the connective tissue graft was removed from the palate as atraumatically as possible. Single sutures were made on the palate (4-0 silk) and the graft was sutured on the receptor site.
The evaluated parameters were wound remaining area (WRA), scar and tissue colorimetry (TC), tissue thickness (TT) and postoperative discomfort (D), evaluated at baseline and 7, 14, 45, 60, and 90 days after surgery.
Statistical Analysis: All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or expressed in percentages during the descriptive phase. Data were analyzed according to distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test. For the remaining wound area, tissue colorimetry, tissue thickness, and postoperative discomfort parameter analysis, two way repeated measures ANOVA was performed for intra- and intergroup analysis. T test was used for intergroup comparison of the number of analgesics taken. The presence or absence of scars was measured by Q-square test. Statistical analysis was performed using Sigma Plot 12.0. In all tests a significance level of 0.05 was chosen.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low Level Laser therapy (LLLT) Sham
The patients allocated to the control group received sham irradiation. For this, black rubber protection was placed at the tip of the laser device, which did not allow the light to reach the tissue. The applications were performed by a different operator (CAS) from the one who measured the study parameters. During irradiation, the tip of the laser probe was placed perpendicularly with slight contact on the area. Laser therapy was initiated in the immediate postoperative period (just after sutures) and was repeated by six more applications performed every other day, with a total of 7 laser applications.
Low Level Laser Therapy
Low Level Laser Therapy on the palatal donor site of connective tissue graft.
GaAlAs laser
Utilization of GaAlAs laser to irradiation on the palatal donor site.
GaAlAs Laser therapy (LLLT) 60 J/cm²
The irradiation was performed with a GaAlAs diode laser that continuously emitted a wavelength of 660 nm with a power of 30 mW. The patients allocated for the group 60 received the following protocol for laser application: Two (2) points of irradiation were performed using a total energy density (fluence) of 60 J/cm2 and a time of 60 seconds (30 J/cm2 per point and an application time of 30 seconds per point). During irradiation, the tip of the laser probe was placed perpendicularly with slight contact on the area. Laser therapy was initiated in the immediate postoperative period (just after sutures) and was repeated by six more applications performed every other day, with a total of 7 laser applications. The power of the equipment was calibrated prior to each application.
Low Level Laser Therapy
Low Level Laser Therapy on the palatal donor site of connective tissue graft.
GaAlAs laser
Utilization of GaAlAs laser to irradiation on the palatal donor site.
GaAlAs Laser therapy (LLLT) 30 J/cm²
The irradiation was performed with a GaAlAs diode laser that continuously emitted a wavelength of 660 nm with a power of 30 mW. The patients allocated for the group 30 received the following protocol for laser application: Two (2) points of irradiation were performed using a total energy density (fluence) of 30 J/cm2 and a time of 30 seconds (15 J/cm2 per point and an application time of 15 seconds per point). During irradiation, the tip of the laser probe was placed perpendicularly with slight contact on the area. Laser therapy was initiated in the immediate postoperative period (just after sutures) and was repeated by six more applications performed every other day, with a total of 7 laser applications. The power of the equipment was calibrated prior to each application.
Low Level Laser Therapy
Low Level Laser Therapy on the palatal donor site of connective tissue graft.
GaAlAs laser
Utilization of GaAlAs laser to irradiation on the palatal donor site.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low Level Laser Therapy
Low Level Laser Therapy on the palatal donor site of connective tissue graft.
GaAlAs laser
Utilization of GaAlAs laser to irradiation on the palatal donor site.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients agreed to and signed the formal consent to participate in the study after receiving an explanation of risks and benefits from an individual who was not a member of the present study (Resolution no. 196 - October, 1996, and Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct in Dentistry - CFO 179/93).
Exclusion Criteria
* Those under medication that could interfere with the wound healing
* Those who smoked
* Those who were pregnant or lactating, and
* Those who had had periodontal surgery on the study area.
20 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mauro Pedrine Santamaria
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mauro P Santamaria, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
College of Dentistry - São José dos Campos, State University of São Paulo
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zucchelli G, Amore C, Sforza NM, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M. Bilaminar techniques for the treatment of recession-type defects. A comparative clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Oct;30(10):862-70. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00397.x.
Bruno JF. Connective tissue graft technique assuring wide root coverage. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994 Apr;14(2):126-37.
da Silva Neves FL, Silveira CA, Dias SB, Santamaria Junior M, de Marco AC, Kerbauy WD, de Melo Filho AB, Jardini MA, Santamaria MP. Comparison of two power densities on the healing of palatal wounds after connective tissue graft removal: randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(7):1371-8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-1988-6. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UEPJMF 2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.