Selective or Stepwise Removal of Deep Caries

NCT ID: NCT02232828

Last Updated: 2015-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: For treating deep caries lesions, selective or stepwise, i. e. one- and two-step incomplete excavation seems advantageous compared with complete caries removal. However, current evidence regarding the success, as defined by not requiring any re-treatments, or survival of teeth after different excavations is insufficient for definitive recommendation, especially when treating deciduous teeth. Moreover, restoration integrity has not been comparatively analyzed longitudinally, and neither patients', dentists' or parents' preferences nor the clinical long-term costs emanating from both initial and re-treatments have been reported yet.

Our primary hypothesis is that success rates differ significantly between selectively and stepwise excavated teeth. Secondary hypotheses are that restoration integrity is assumed to significantly differ between selectively and stepwise excavated teeth.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The treatment of deep caries lesions is associated with significant risks for the pulp, including pulpal exposure and post-operative pulpal complications, which might eventually compromise the retention of the tooth \[1\]. Moreover, treating deep lesions might be associated with pain and subjective burden both during and after treatment and might generate long-term costs due to re-treatments being required \[2, 3\].

For deciduous teeth, various treatments for deep lesions have been described: Complete excavation aims at removing all infected and affected carious dentin, with the inherent risk of pulpal exposure. In contrast, stepwise, i. e. two-step excavation leaves carious dentin after the initial excavation step, then seals residual caries under a temporary restoration, and re-enters the cavity in a second step to eventually attempt complete excavation. This approach is thought to facilitate arrest and remineralization of the lesion and to induce development of tertiary dentin, thereby reducing the risk of pulpal exposure and post-operative complications after the second excavation step \[4, 5\]. Since several studies found sealed residual lesions to be clinically and microbiologically arrested, the need to re-enter was increasingly questioned within the last decade \[6\]. Selective, i. e. one-step incomplete or partial excavation seals carious dentin under a definitive restoration, omitting any re-entry \[7\]. Sealing the lesion is thought to deprive residual bacteria from dietary carbohydrates and was found to exert significant antibacterial effects, thus arresting the lesion \[8, 9\].

However, doubts remain regarding the effects of sealed carious dentin on the long-term quality of the restoration \[10\]. Moreover, it remains unknown if patients prefer one of both treatments, which might be especially relevant when treating children. Several studies comparing complete with selective or stepwise excavation of deciduous teeth have been published, but only one three-arm study compared selective with stepwise excavation of primary teeth (Tab. 1). In addition, none of these studies assessed patient- or dentists-centered outcomes, i. e. preferences, or analyzed clinically assessed long-term costs emanating from both excavations.

Objectives and Hypotheses The study aims at comparing the success, i. e. the probability of not requiring any re-interventions, and the survival, i. e. the probability of not requiring tooth removal, of selectively versus stepwise excavated vital, non-symptomatic deciduous molars with deep lesions. In addition, we assess the restoration integrity of selectively versus stepwise excavated deciduous molars, evaluate the preference of patients, parents and dentists for one of both strategies, and comparatively assess the costs associated with each strategy.

Our primary hypothesis is that success rates differ significantly between selectively and stepwise excavated teeth. Secondary hypotheses are that restoration integrity is assumed to significantly differ between selectively and stepwise excavated teeth. Moreover, we hypothesize that patients', parents' and dentists' preference is significantly different for selective versus stepwise excavated teeth. Eventually, both initial and long-term costs of excavation methods are supposed to significantly differ.

The planned study is a secondary care-based prospective, multi-center two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial at three pediatric university dental clinics in Germany. We plan to enroll 300 patients with one or more deeply carious, sensitive and non-symptomatic deciduous molar. One molar per patient will be randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments (selective or stepwise excavation). Total follow-up time will be three years after completion of the initial treatment. Success, survival and restoration integrity will be assessed after one, two and three years. Patients', parents' and dentists' preference will be assessed after each treatment using visual-analogue scale or Likert-rating scales. Costs will be assessed for initial and follow-up treatments and will be based on a micro-costing approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Selective removal

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Selective removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Caries removal in the periphery including the enamel-dentinal junction will be performed using rose head burs and/or an excavator until hard, dry dentin remains. Pulpo-proximal caries will be removed until leathery, slightly moist and reasonably soft dentin remains. Operating dentists will be calibrated prior to study commencement regarding these criteria using extracted teeth. Moisture control will be performed using cotton rolls and continuous aspiration. Restoration will be performed adhesively, with a self-etching one-bottle adhesive (G-aenial bond, GC, Bad Homburg, Germany) and a compomer material (Dyract, Dentsply Detray, Konstanz, Germany) being used.

Stepwise removal

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Stepwise removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Caries removal in the periphery including the enamel-dentinal junction will be performed using rose head burs and/or an excavator until hard, dry dentin remains. Pulpo-proximal caries will be removed until leathery, slightly moist and reasonably soft dentin remains. Operating dentists will be calibrated prior to study commencement regarding these criteria using extracted teeth. Moisture control will be performed using cotton rolls and continuous aspiration. Restoration will be performed adhesively, with a self-etching one-bottle adhesive (G-aenial bond, GC, Bad Homburg, Germany) and a compomer material (Dyract, Dentsply Detray, Konstanz, Germany) being used.

If allocated to stepwise excavation, the second excavation will now be performed as described until only hard, dry dentin remains. Restoration will again be provided adhesively as described.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Selective removal

Caries removal in the periphery including the enamel-dentinal junction will be performed using rose head burs and/or an excavator until hard, dry dentin remains. Pulpo-proximal caries will be removed until leathery, slightly moist and reasonably soft dentin remains. Operating dentists will be calibrated prior to study commencement regarding these criteria using extracted teeth. Moisture control will be performed using cotton rolls and continuous aspiration. Restoration will be performed adhesively, with a self-etching one-bottle adhesive (G-aenial bond, GC, Bad Homburg, Germany) and a compomer material (Dyract, Dentsply Detray, Konstanz, Germany) being used.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stepwise removal

Caries removal in the periphery including the enamel-dentinal junction will be performed using rose head burs and/or an excavator until hard, dry dentin remains. Pulpo-proximal caries will be removed until leathery, slightly moist and reasonably soft dentin remains. Operating dentists will be calibrated prior to study commencement regarding these criteria using extracted teeth. Moisture control will be performed using cotton rolls and continuous aspiration. Restoration will be performed adhesively, with a self-etching one-bottle adhesive (G-aenial bond, GC, Bad Homburg, Germany) and a compomer material (Dyract, Dentsply Detray, Konstanz, Germany) being used.

If allocated to stepwise excavation, the second excavation will now be performed as described until only hard, dry dentin remains. Restoration will again be provided adhesively as described.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children 3-9 yr
* Good general health
* Minimum one active deep (D3) occlusal/occlusal-proximal, one-/two-surface caries lesion

Exclusion Criteria

* Participating in other study
* Plan to move or not resident
* Systemic disease or general disability
* Expected limited compliance
* Known allergy to study material expected exfoliation within 18 month
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule RWTH Aachen, Germany

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medicine Greifswald

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Falk Schwendicke

OA Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Falk Schwendicke, OA Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chatrite Berlin, Germany

Sebastian Paris, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Charite Berlin, Germany

Christian Finke, OA Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Charite Berlin, Germany

Marina A. Petrou, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Uniklinic RWTH Aachen, Germany

Christian Spleith, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Greifswald, Germany

Ruth Santamaria, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Greifswald, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Präventive Zahnmedizin und Kinderzahnheilkunde

Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Uniklinik RWTH Aachen; Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Parodontologie und Präventive Zahnheilkunde

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

CharitéCentrum für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde der Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Orthodontie und Kinderzahnmedizin

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

CharitéCentrum für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde der Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Abteilungen für Zahnerhaltung und Präventive Zahnheilkunde

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Falk Schwendicke, OA Dr.

Role: CONTACT

+4930450562 ext. 556

Sebastian Paris, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

+4930450562 ext. 332

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Christian Splieth, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

Ruth Santamaria, Dr.

Role: backup

Marina A. Petrou, Dr.

Role: primary

Christian Finke, OA Dr.

Role: primary

+49450562 ext. 0

Falk Schwendicke, OA Dr.

Role: primary

+4930450562 ext. 556

Sebastian Paris, Prof. Dr.

Role: backup

+4930450562 ext. 332

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elhennawy K, Finke C, Paris S, Reda S, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Schwendicke F. Selective vs stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in primary molars: 24 months follow-up from a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Feb;25(2):645-652. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03536-6. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32857210 (View on PubMed)

Elhennawy K, Finke C, Paris S, Reda S, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Schwendicke F. Selective vs stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in primary molars: 12-Months results of a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Dent. 2018 Oct;77:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30025748 (View on PubMed)

Schwendicke F, Schweigel H, Petrou MA, Santamaria R, Hopfenmuller W, Finke C, Paris S. Selective or stepwise removal of deep caries in deciduous molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Jan 6;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0525-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25560779 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CARIEX2or1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.