Clinical Criteria for the Evaluation of Caries Lesions Around Restorations in Primary Teeth (CARDEC-03)

NCT ID: NCT03520309

Last Updated: 2021-10-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

163 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-16

Study Completion Date

2021-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is still great divergence in the aspects related to caries lesions around restorations. The methods and the systems used for the detection of secondary caries lesions have presented low validity. Also, the consequent treatment decisions of this kind of lesions have presented a lot of variation. However, the correct diagnosis of secondary caries may guarantee greater longevity to the restorative treatment, as well as oral health to the patients, reducing the cost and clinical time of the dentists. Therefore, the investigators aimed to perform this study to evaluate and compare two visual criteria for the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth in medium and long term outcomes for the patients, through a randomized clinical study. These criteria are the system proposed by the World Dental Federation (FDI) and the International Caries Classification and Management System - ICCMS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Among the available diagnosis criteria to detect caries lesions around restorations, there are the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria and the International Caries Classification and Management System - ICCMS. However, few studies have evaluated the accuracy of both methods. The impact of the use of these methods in the treatment decisions regarding the restorations was also not evaluated. In relation to the detection of caries lesions around restorations in primary teeth, no randomized clinical study was performed, so the aim of this study is to establish the best diagnosis and treatment decision to caries around restorations in children. For this, three different studies will be carried out according the following specific aims: (1) to evaluate the accuracy of the FDI criteria and the system proposed by the ICCMS for the evaluation of caries lesions around restorations in primary teeth through a cross-sectional study design; (2) to evaluate the impact and cost of using these two criteria in treatment decisions related to the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth through a cross-sectional study design; (3) to evaluate the influence of the use of these two criteria for the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth in medium and long term outcomes for the patients, through a randomized clinical trial. To reach these objectives 626 restorations will be evaluated in children from 3 to 10 years who have looked for dental treatment in our dental school. They will be randomly allocated in two groups according to the diagnostic strategy used for caries detection around restorations: diagnosis and treatment decision based on the criteria of the International Dental Federation (FDI) (control group) or diagnosis and treatment decision based on the CARS detection criteria and treatment decision proposed by the ICCMS (experimental group). The consequent treatment decision of the restorations will be divided into no restorative intervention; repair or replacement of the restorations. Children will be treated by dentists, blinded to the criteria used to reach the treatment decision and then, will be monitored for two years. Reassessments will be performed by a blind examiner in relation to the child's allocation group, and the occurrence of outcomes will be assessed according to predefined criteria described for evaluation of restorations performed in the context of atraumatic restorative treatment. The primary outcome will be the need for restorative intervention during the follow-up of the restorations evaluated by the different criteria. This outcome is composed of several components. The reference standard will be the presence of caries lesion adjacent to the restoration after removal of the restoration, and their occurrence will be compared among the methods by survival analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Caries Secondary Dental Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

International Dental Federation

Dental Treatment: according to the decision based on the International Dental Federation (FDI) criteria

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dental treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Treatment of all dental restorations of the children according to the diagnosis criteria

Caries Around Restorations System

Dental Treatment: according to the decision based on the Caries Around Restorations System (CARS) and treatment decision proposed by the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dental treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Treatment of all dental restorations of the children according to the diagnosis criteria

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dental treatment

Treatment of all dental restorations of the children according to the diagnosis criteria

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children who sought dental treatment in our dental school (School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil)
* Children aged 3 to 6 years
* Children with at least one restoration on a primary tooth of any material, on any dental surface and regardless of its condition.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children whose parents refuse to participate of the research
* Children who refuse to participate of the research or exhibited behavioral problems during the initial appointment
* All child's restorations will be included in the evaluation, except for restorations presenting fistula, abscess, pulp exposure, history of spontaneous dental pain or mobility.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fausto Medeiros Mendes

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fausto M Mendes, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ismail AI, Pitts NB, Tellez M; Authors of International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS); Banerjee A, Deery C, Douglas G, Eggertsson H, Ekstrand K, Ellwood R, Gomez J, Jablonski-Momeni A, Kolker J, Longbottom C, Manton D, Martignon S, McGrady M, Rechmann P, Ricketts D, Sohn W, Thompson V, Twetman S, Weyant R, Wolff M, Zandona A. The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) An Example of a Caries Management Pathway. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S9. Epub 2015 Sep 15. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26391116 (View on PubMed)

Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):259-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20847997 (View on PubMed)

Martins-Junior PA, Ramos-Jorge J, Paiva SM, Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML. Validations of the Brazilian version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). Cad Saude Publica. 2012 Feb;28(2):367-74. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2012000200015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22331162 (View on PubMed)

Shivakumar K, Prasad S, Chandu G. International Caries Detection and Assessment System: A new paradigm in detection of dental caries. J Conserv Dent. 2009 Jan;12(1):10-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.53335.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20379434 (View on PubMed)

Roeleveld AC, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of Class II glass ionomer restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Jun;7(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/BF03320820.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17140533 (View on PubMed)

Olegario IC, Moro BLP, Tedesco TK, Freitas RD, Passaro AL, Garbim JR, Oliveira R, Mendes FM; CARDEC 03 collaborative group; Raggio DP. Use of rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation on composite resin restorations' survival in primary molars: 2-year results from a non-inferiority clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02449-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36217147 (View on PubMed)

Moro BLP, Pontes LRA, Maia HC, Freitas RD, Tedesco TK, Raggio DP, Braga MM, Ekstrand KR, Imparato JCP, Cenci MS, Mendes FM. Clinical Accuracy of Two Different Criteria for the Detection of Caries Lesions around Restorations in Primary Teeth. Caries Res. 2022;56(2):98-108. doi: 10.1159/000523951. Epub 2022 May 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35504257 (View on PubMed)

Freitas RD, Moro BLP, Pontes LRA, Maia HCM, Passaro AL, Oliveira RC, Garbim JR, Vigano MEF, Tedesco TK, Deery C, Raggio DP, Cenci MS, Mendes FM, Braga MM; CARDEC collaborative group - CARDEC-03 trial. The economic impact of two diagnostic strategies in the management of restorations in primary teeth: a health economic analysis plan for a trial-based economic evaluation. Trials. 2021 Nov 12;22(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05722-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34772437 (View on PubMed)

Moro BLP, Signori C, Freitas RD, Pontes LRA, Lenzi TL, Tedesco TK, Raggio DP, Braga MM, Ekstrand KR, Cenci MS, Mendes FM; CARDEC collaborative group; CaCIA collaborative group. The effect of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in children (CARDEC-03): study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial. F1000Res. 2020 Jun 26;9:650. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23801.3. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33520191 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CARDEC-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id